In all cases, each director will hold office until his or her successor has been elected and qualified or until the director’s earlier resignation or removal. If the Amendment is not approved, the Board of Directors will remain classified. Appendix A shows the proposed changes to Bye-Laws 8, 11 and 12, with deletions indicated by strikeouts and additions indicated by underlining.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE BYE-LAWS. This proposal requires the affirmative vote of at least 75% of the issued and outstanding shares of the company. Abstentions will have the same effect as votes “against” the proposal.

Proposal No. 2

Election of Directors

The Board is divided into three classes, and our Class I directors are serving a term of office expiring at the annual general meeting of shareholders in 2014 the Class II directors are serving a term of office expiring at the annual general meeting of shareholders in 2012, and the Class III directors are serving a term of office expiring at the annual general meeting of shareholders in 2013. At each annual general meeting of shareholders, successors to the class of directors whose term expires at such annual general meeting will be elected for a three-year term.Annual General Meeting. A director holds office until the annual general meeting of shareholders for the year in which his or her term expires, and until such director’s successor has been duly elected and qualified or until such director is removed from office under our Bye-Laws or such director’s office is otherwise earlier vacated. At each annual general meeting, successors to the class of directors whose term expires at such annual general meeting will be elected for a three-year term. However, if shareholders approve Proposal No. 1 providing for annual election of directors, beginning with the 2015 Annual General Meeting, successors to the class of directors whose term expires at such annual general meeting will be elected for a one-year term.

As previously announced, neither Mr. Rex Adams nor Sir John Banham has been nominated for re-election at the 2014 Annual General Meeting because each has reached the mandatory retirement age. Following the completion of the terms of Mr. Adams and Sir John Banham at the conclusion of the 2014 Annual General Meeting, the Board intends to reduce its size to nine (9) members.

The Board has nominated Martin L. Flanagan, C. Robert Henrikson, Ben F. Johnson, IIIMessrs. Denis Kessler and J. Thomas PresbyG. Richard Wagoner, Jr. for election as directors of the company for a term ending at the 2015 annual general meeting.2017 Annual General Meeting. Messrs. Flanagan, Henrikson, Johnson,Kessler and PresbyWagoner are current directors of the company.company and further information regarding each of them is shown on the following page. Each nominee has indicated to the company that he would serve if elected. We do not anticipate that Messrs. Flanagan, Henrikson, JohnsonKessler or PresbyWagoner would be unable to stand for election, but if that were to happen, the Board may reduce the size of the Board, designate a substitute or leave a vacancy unfilled. If a substitute is designated, proxies voting on the original director candidate will be cast for the substituted candidate.

Under our Bye-Laws, at any general meeting held for the purpose of electing directors at which a quorum is present, each director nominee receiving a majority of the votes cast at the meeting will be elected as a director. If a nominee for director who is an incumbent director is not elected and no successor has been elected at the meeting, the director is required under our Bye-Laws to submit his or her resignation as a director. Our Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee would then make a recommendation to the full Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation. If the resignation is not accepted by the Board, the director will continue to serve until the next annual general meeting and until his or her successor is duly elected, or his or her earlier resignation or removal. If the director’s resignation is accepted by the Board, then the Board may fill the vacancy. However, if the number of nominees exceeds the number of positions available for the election of directors, the directors so elected shall be those nominees who have received the greatest number of votes and at least a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy.

Recommendation of the Board

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES. This proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual General Meeting.

Information about Director Nominees

and Directors Continuing in Office

Director Nominees

Listed below are the names, ages as of March 31, 2014, and principal occupations for the past five years of the director nominees and directors continuing in office.

Directors Continuing in Office – Term Expiring in 2015

Non-Executive       Director       Director since 2009       Committees:       Audit,       Compensation,       and Nomination       and Corporate       Governance		Ben Johnson (70) has served as a non-executive director of our company since January 2009. Mr. Johnson served as the managing partner at Alston & Bird LLP from 1997 to 2008. He was named a partner at Alston & Bird in 1976, having joined the firm in 1971. He received his B.A. degree from Emory University and his J.D. degree from Harvard Law School. He serves as chair of the board of trustees of Atlanta’s Woodward Academy and is the immediate past chair of the board of trustees of Emory University, a position he held from 2000-2013. Mr. Johnson also serves as a trustee of The Carter Center and the Charles Loridans Foundation. He is chair and a non-executive director of Summit Industries, Inc. Skills and Expertise Ben Johnson brings to the Board more than a decade of experience leading one of the largest law firms in Atlanta, Georgia, where Invesco was founded and grew to prominence. His career as one of the region’s leading business litigators has given Mr. Johnson deep experience of the types of business and legal issues that are regularly faced by large public companies such as Invesco.
Non-Executive       Director       Director since 2005       Committees:       Audit, and       Nomination and       Corporate       Governance		Thomas Presby (74) has served as a non-executive director of our company since November 2005 and as chairman of the Audit Committee since April 2006. Over a period of thirty years as a partner at Deloitte LLP, he held many positions in the U.S. and abroad, including global deputy chairman and chief operating officer. Currently he is a director of the following other public companies where he also chairs the audit committees: First Solar, Inc., World Fuel Services Corp. and ExamWorks Group Inc. From 2003 to 2009, Mr. Presby was a director of Turbochef Technologies, Inc., from 2005 to 2011 he was a director of American Eagle Outfitters, Inc., and from 2003 to 2012 he was a director of Tiffany & Co. He is a board member of the New York chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors and a trustee of Montclair State University (N.J.). He previously served as a trustee of Rutgers University and as a director and chairman of the audit committee of The German Marshall Fund of the USA. He received a B.S. in electrical engineering from Rutgers University and an MBA degree from the Carnegie Mellon University Graduate School of Business. Mr. Presby is a certified public accountant in New York and Ohio and a holder of the NACD Certificate of Director Education. He was named by the National Association of Corporate Directors as one of the “Top 100” directors of 2011. Skills and Expertise Thomas Presby has amassed considerable experience at the highest levels of finance and accounting, having served for three decades as a partner, as well as in positions of senior management (including chief operating officer), at one of the world’s largest accounting firms. In keeping with his experience, Mr. Presby has been sought by leading companies in a variety of industries to chair the audit committee, a role which he also fulfills for Invesco, where he is additionally recognized by the Board as one of our audit committee financial experts as defined under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Directors Continuing in Office – Term Expiring in 2016
Non-Executive       Director       Director since 1997       Committees:       Nomination and       Corporate       Governance		Joseph Canion (69) has served as a non-executive director of our company since 1997 and was a director of a predecessor constituent company (AIM Investments) from 1993 to 1997, when Invesco acquired that entity. Mr. Canion has been a leading figure in the technology industry after co-founding Compaq Computer Corporation in 1982 and serving as its chief executive officer from 1982 to 1991. He also founded Insource Technology Group in 1992 and served as its chairman until September 2006. Mr. Canion received a B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Houston. He is on the board of directors of ChaCha Search, Inc. and is an advisory director of Encore Health Resources and Dynamics, Inc. and Houston Methodist Research Institute. From 2008 to 2011 he was a member of the board of Auditude. Skills and Expertise Joseph Canion has extensive service as a board member within the investment management industry, having also served as a director of AIM Investments, a leading U.S. mutual fund manager, from 1991 through 1997 when Invesco acquired AIM. Mr. Canion additionally has notable experience as an entrepreneur, havingco-founded a business that grew into a major international technology company. We believe that his experience guiding a company throughout the entirety of its business lifecycle has given him a wide-ranging understanding of the types of issues faced by private and public companies.
Non-Executive       Director       Director since 2004       Committees:       Audit       Compensation       and Nomination       and Corporate       Governance		Edward Lawrence (72) has served as a non-executive director of our company since October 2004. He was a partner of Ropes & Gray, a Boston law firm, from 1976 to December 2007. He currently is a retired partner of Ropes & Gray and a member of the investment committee of the firm’s trust department. Mr. Lawrence is a graduate of Harvard College and earned a J.D. from Columbia University Law School. He is chairman of Partners Health Care System, Inc. and chairman of Dana-Farber Partners Cancer Center. From 1995 to 2011 he was a trustee (and chairman from 1999 to 2008) of the Board of the Massachusetts General Hospital and was a trustee of McLean Hospital in Belmont, Massachusetts from 2000 to 2011. Skills and Expertise Edward Lawrence has over thirty years’ experience as a corporate and business lawyer in a major Boston law firm, which has given him a very substantial understanding of the business issues facing large financial services companies such as Invesco. In particular, Mr. Lawrence specialized in issues arising under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 which provide the Federal legal framework for the company’s U.S. investment management business. This background gives Mr. Lawrence an understanding of the potential legal ramifications of Board decisions which is particularly valuable to the Board’s functioning on many of the decisions it is called upon to take. As a member of his law firm’s trust investment practice and as member of investment committees of numerous entities, he also has had frequent interaction with investment advisers located throughout the country, giving him an opportunity to view a wide range of investment styles and practices.

Non-Executive       Director       Director since 2010       Committees:       Audit,       Compensation,       and Nomination       and Corporate       Governance		Phoebe Wood (60) has served as a non-executive director of our company since January 2010. She is currently a principal at CompaniesWood and served as vice chairman, chief financial officer and in other capacities at Brown-Forman Corporation from 2001 until her retirement in 2008. Prior to Brown-Forman, Ms. Wood was vice president, chief financial officer and a director of Propel Corporation (a subsidiary of Motorola) from 2000 to 2001. Previously, Ms. Wood served in various capacities during her tenure at Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) from 1976 to 2000. Ms. Wood currently serves on the boards of directors of Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (compensation committee), Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (audit, corporate responsibility and sustainability and affiliated transaction committees) and Pioneer Natural Resources Company (audit and nominating and corporate governance committees), as well as on the boards of trustees for the University of Louisville, the Gheens Foundation and the American Printing House for the Blind. From 2001 to 2011 Ms. Wood was a member of the board of trustees for Smith College. Ms. Wood received her A.B. degree from Smith College and her M.B.A. from University of California Los Angeles. Skills and Expertise Phoebe Wood has extensive experience as both a director and a member of senior financial management of public companies in a variety of industries. Her significant accounting, financial, and business expertise have made her a particularly valuable addition to our directors’ mix of skills, and she has been designated as one of our audit committee’s financial experts, as defined under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Retiring Directors
Non-Executive       Director       Director since 2001       Committees:       Compensation,       and Nomination       and Corporate       Governance		Rex Adams (73) became chairman of the company in April 2006. He has served as a non-executive director of our company since November 2001 and as chairman of the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee since January 2007. Mr. Adams was dean of the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University from 1996 to 2001 following a 30-year career with Mobil Corporation. He joined Mobil International in London in 1965 and served as vice president of administration for Mobil Corporation from 1988 to 1996. Mr. Adams was previously a director and member of the audit committee at Vintage Petroleum. Mr. Adams earned a B.A. from Duke University. He was selected as a Rhodes Scholar in 1962 and studied at Merton College, Oxford University. Mr. Adams serves on the Board of Directors of Alleghany Corporation and formerly served as chairman of the Public Broadcasting Service. Skills and Expertise Rex Adams has broad international experience in senior management of one of the world’s largest public companies, as well as substantial insight on a variety of business management issues from an academic perspective. His nearly decade of service on our Board has given him a deep understanding of the variety of issues encountered by investment management companies throughout the business cycle.

Non-Executive       Director       Director since 1999       Committees:       Audit,       Compensation,       and Nomination       and Corporate       Governance		Sir John Banham (73) has served as a non-executive director of our company since 1999 and as chairman of the Compensation Committee since January 2007. Sir John was director general of the Confederation of British Industry from 1987 to 1992, a director of National Power and National Westminster Bank from 1992 to 1998, chairman of Tarmac PLC from 1994 to 2000, chairman of Kingfisher PLC from 1995 to 2001, chairman of Whitbread PLC from 2000 to 2005, chairman of Geest plc from 2002 to 2005 and chairman of Spacelabs Healthcare Inc. from 2005 to 2008. He was the chairman of Johnson Matthey plc from 2006 to 2011. He is currently chairman of Sultan Scientific Limited and of the UK Future Homes Commission, and an independent director of Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals Inc. Sir John is a graduate of Cambridge University and has been awarded honorary doctorates by four leading U.K. universities. Skills and Expertise Sir John Banham brings to the Board a very broad appreciation for international business issues garnered over an extraordinary career in a variety of industries, including financial services. From 2006 to 2011 he was chairman of a successful global manufacturing company. As past director general of the Confederation of British Industry, he represented the views of British business to relevant governments and regulators. Sir John’s experience across a substantial spectrum of industries and companies within the United Kingdom gives him unique insight into the needs of our business in one of Invesco’s most significant and successful markets.

For a director to be considered independent, the Board must affirmatively determine that the director does not have any material relationship with the company either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the company. Such determinations are made and disclosed pursuantaccording to applicable NYSErules established by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) or other rules. A material relationship can include, but is not limited to, commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and family relationships. In accordance with the rules of the NYSE, the Board has affirmatively determined that it is currently composed of a majority of independent directors, and that the following directors are independent and do not have a material relationship with the company: Rex D. Adams, Sir John Banham, Joseph R. Canion, C. Robert Henrikson, Ben F. Johnson III, Denis Kessler, Edward P. Lawrence, J. Thomas Presby, G. Richard Wagoner, Jr. and Phoebe A. Wood.

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES. The voting requirements for this proposal are described above and in the “Questions and Answers About Voting Your Common Shares” section.

INFORMATION ABOUT DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND DIRECTORS CONTINUING IN OFFICECorporate Governance

Listed below are the names, ages as of March 30, 2012, and principal occupations for the past five years of the director nominees and directors continuing in office.

Martin L. Flanagan, CFA, CPA (51) President and Chief Executive Officer of Invesco Ltd.

Martin L. Flanagan has been a director and president and chief executive officer of Invesco since August 2005. He is also a trustee and vice-chairman of the Invesco Family of Funds. Mr. Flanagan joined Invesco from Franklin Resources, Inc., where he was president and co-chief executive officer from January 2004 to July 2005. Previously he had been Franklin’s co-president from May 2003 to January 2004, chief operating officer and chief financial officer from November 1999 to May 2003, and senior vice president and chief financial officer from 1993 until November 1999. Mr. Flanagan served as director, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Templeton, Galbraith & Hansberger, Ltd. before its acquisition by Franklin in 1992. Before joining Templeton in 1983, he worked with Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Flanagan received a B.A. and BBA from Southern Methodist University (SMU). He is a CFA charterholder and a certified public accountant. He serves on the Board of Governors and as a member of the Executive Committee for the Investment Company Institute, and is a former chairman. He also serves as a member of the executive board at the SMU Cox School of Business and a member of various civic organizations in Atlanta.

C. Robert Henrikson(64) Non-Executive Director

Mr. Henrikson has served as a non-executive director of our company since January 2012. Mr. Henrikson was president and chief executive officer of MetLife, Inc. and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company from March 2006 through May 2011, and he served as a director of MetLife, Inc. from April 2005, and as chairman from April 2006, through December 31, 2011. During his more than 39-year career with MetLife, Inc., Mr. Henrikson held a number of senior positions in that company’s individual, group and pension businesses. In July 2010, Mr. Henrikson was appointed by President Barack Obama to the President’s Export Council, the principal national advisory committee on international trade. Mr. Henrikson is a former chairman of the American Council of Life Insurers, a former chairman of the Financial Services Forum, a director emeritus of the American Benefits Council, chairman of the board of the Wharton School’s S.S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, and a trustee of the American Museum of Natural History. He also serves on the Board of Trustees of Emory University and the boards of directors of The New York Philharmonic, The New York Botanical Garden, and the Partnership for New York City. Mr. Henrikson received a bachelor’s degree from the University of Pennsylvania and a law degree from Emory University School of Law. In addition, he is a graduate of the Wharton School’s Advanced Management Program.

Ben F. Johnson, III(68) Non-Executive Director

Ben Johnson has served as a non-executive director of our company since January 2009. Mr. Johnson served as the managing partner at Alston & Bird LLP from 1997 to 2008. He was named a partner at Alston & Bird in 1976, having joined the firm in 1971. He received his B.A. degree from Emory University and his J.D. degree from Harvard Law School. He serves as Chair of the Board of Trustees of Emory University and Atlanta’s Woodward Academy and immediate past chair and board member of the Atlanta Symphony Orchestra. Mr. Johnson also serves as a Trustee of The Carter Center and the Charles Loridans Foundation. He is chair and a non-executive director of Summit Industries, Inc., a privately-held company.

J. Thomas Presby, CPA (72) Non-Executive Director

Thomas Presby has served as a non-executive director of our company since November 2005 and as chairman of the Audit Committee since April 2006. Over a period of thirty years as a partner in Deloitte, he held

many positions in the United States and abroad, including Global Deputy Chairman and Chief Operating Officer. Currently he is a director of the following other public companies where he also chairs the audit committees: First Solar, Inc., Tiffany & Co., World Fuel Services Corp. and ExamWorks Group Inc. From 2003 to 2009, Mr. Presby was a director of Turbochef Technologies, Inc., where he chaired the audit committee, and from 2005 to 2011 he was a director of American Eagle Outfitters, Inc., where he also served as audit committee chairman. He is a board member of the New York chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors. He previously served as a trustee of Rutgers University and as a director and chairman of the audit committee of The German Marshall Fund of the USA. He received a B.S. in electrical engineering from Rutgers University and an MBA degree from the Carnegie Mellon University Graduate School of Business. Mr. Presby is a certified public accountant in New York and Ohio and a holder of the NACD Certificate of Director Education.

Joseph R. Canion(67) Non-Executive Director

Joseph Canion has served as a non-executive director of our company since 1997 and was a director of a predecessor constituent company (AIM Investments) from 1993 to 1997, when Invesco acquired that entity. Mr. Canion has been a leading figure in the technology industry after co-founding Compaq Computer Corporation in 1982 and serving as its chief executive officer from 1982 to 1991. He also founded Insource Technology Group in 1992 and served as its chairman until September 2006. Mr. Canion received a B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Houston. He is on the board of directors of ChaCha Search, Inc. and is an advisory director of Encore Health Resources and Dynamics, Inc. From 2008 to 2011 he was a member of the board of Auditude.

Edward P. Lawrence(70) Non-Executive Director

Edward Lawrence has served as a non-executive director of our company since October 2004. He was a partner of Ropes & Gray, a Boston law firm, from 1976 to December 2007. He currently is a retired partner of Ropes & Gray and a member of the investment committee of the firm’s trust department. Mr. Lawrence is a graduate of Harvard College and earned a J.D. from Columbia University Law School. He is vice chairman of Partners Health Care System, Inc. From 1995 to 2011 he was a trustee (and chairman from 1999 to 2008) of the Board of the Massachusetts General Hospital and was a trustee of McLean Hospital in Belmont, Massachusetts from 2000 to 2011.

James I. Robertson(54) Senior Managing Director and Head of UK and Continental Europe; Director

James Robertson has served as a member of the Board of Directors of our company since April 2004. He is currently Invesco’s head of UK and Continental Europe. He was head of Operations and Technology from October 2005 to September 2008. He was chief financial officer from April 2004 to October 2005. Mr. Robertson joined our company as director of finance and corporate development for Invesco Global in 1993 and repeated this role for the Pacific division in 1995. Mr. Robertson became managing director of global strategic planning in 1996 and served as chief executive officer of AMVESCAP Group Services, Inc. from 2001 to 2005. He holds an M.A. from Cambridge University and is a Chartered Accountant.

Phoebe A. Wood (58) Non-Executive Director

Ms. Wood has served as a non-executive director of our company since January 2010. She is currently a principal at CompaniesWood and served as Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and in other capacities at Brown-Forman Corporation from 2001 until her retirement in 2008. Prior to Brown-Forman, Ms. Wood was Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and a Director of Propel Corporation (a subsidiary of Motorola) from 2000 to 2001. Previously, Ms. Wood served in various capacities during her tenure at Atlantic Richfield

Company (ARCO) from 1976 to 2000. Ms. Wood currently serves on the Boards of Directors of Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (audit and compensation committees), Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. (audit and affiliated transaction committees), as well as on the boards of trustees for the University of Louisville, the Gheens Foundation and the American Printing House for the Blind. From 2001 to 2011 Ms. Wood was a member of the board of trustees for Smith College. Ms. Wood received her A.B. degree from Smith College and her M.B.A. from University of California Los Angeles.

Rex D. Adams(71) Chairman and Non-Executive Director

Rex Adams became chairman of the company on April 27, 2006. He has served as a non-executive director of our company since November 2001 and as chairman of the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee since January 2007. Mr. Adams was dean of the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University from 1996 to 2001 following a 30-year career with Mobil Corporation. He joined Mobil International in London in 1965 and served as vice president of administration for Mobil Corporation from 1988 to 1996. Mr. Adams was previously a director and member of the audit committee at Vintage Petroleum. Mr. Adams received a B.A. from Duke University. He was selected as a Rhodes Scholar in 1962 and studied at Merton College, Oxford University. Mr. Adams serves on the Board of Directors of Alleghany Corporation and formerly served as chairman of the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and a trustee of Duke University.

Sir John Banham(71) Non-Executive Director

Sir John Banham has served as a non-executive director of our company since 1999 and as chairman of the Compensation Committee since January 2007. Sir John was director general of the Confederation of British Industry from 1987 to 1992, a director of National Power and National Westminster Bank from 1992 to 1998, chairman of Tarmac PLC from 1994 to 2000, chairman of Kingfisher PLC from 1995 to 2001, chairman of Whitbread PLC from 2000 to 2005, chairman of Geest plc from 2002 to 2005 and chairman of Spacelabs Healthcare Inc. from 2005 to 2008. He was the chairman of Johnson Matthey plc from 2006 to 2011. Sir John is a graduate of Cambridge University and has been awarded honorary doctorates by four leading U.K. universities.

Denis Kessler(60) Non-Executive Director

Denis Kessler has served as a non-executive director of our company since March 2002. A noted economist, Mr. Kessler is chairman and chief executive officer of SCOR SE. He is chairman of the Boards of Directors of SCOR GLOBAL LIFE SE and SCOR GLOBAL P&C SE, chairman of the Supervisory Board of SCOR GLOBAL INVESTMENTS SE and serves as a member of the Boards of Directors of BNP Paribas SA, Bollore, Dassault Aviation and Fonds Strategique d’Investissement. He is member of the Supervisory Board of Yam Invest N.V. Mr. Kessler received adiplômefrom the Paris Business School (HEC) andDoctorat d’Etatin economics from the University of Paris.

Director and Nominee Qualifications to Serve on our Board

As described in greater detail below, the Board believes that there are certain minimum qualifications that each director nominee must satisfy in order to be suitable for a position as a director. (See below under the caption “THE NOMINATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE.”) The Board believes that, consistent with these requirements, each member of our Board displays a high degree of personal and professional integrity, an ability to exercise sound business judgment on a broad range of issues, sufficient experience and background to have an appreciation of the issues facing our company, a willingness to devote the necessary time to Board duties, a commitment to representing the best interests of the company and its shareholders and a dedication to enhancing shareholder value. The Board does not consider individual directors

to be responsible for particular areas of the Board’s focus or specific categories of issues that may come before it. Rather, the Board seeks to assemble a group of directors that, as a whole, represents a mix of experiences and skills that allows appropriate deliberation on all issues that the Board might be likely to consider. Set forth below is a brief description of the particular experience or skills of each director that led the Board to conclude that such person should serve as a director in light of our business and structure.

Rex D. Adams— Mr. Adams has broad international experience in senior management of one of the world’s largest public companies, as well as substantial insight on a variety of business management issues from an academic perspective. His nearly decade of service on our Board has given him a deep understanding of the variety of issues encountered by investment management companies throughout the business cycle.

Sir John Banham— Sir John brings to the Board a very broad appreciation for international business issues garnered over an extraordinary career in a variety of industries, including financial services. Until July 2011 he was chairman of a successful global manufacturing company, one of the most admired public companies in the United Kingdom. As past director general of the Confederation of British Industry, he represented the views of British business to relevant governments and regulators. Sir John’s experience across a substantial spectrum of industries and companies within the United Kingdom gives him unique insight into the needs of our business in one of Invesco’s most significant and successful markets.

Denis Kessler —Mr. Kessler’s experience as an economist and chief executive of a major global reinsurance company have combined to give him valuable insight into both the investment management industry’s macro-economic positioning over the long term as well as our company’s particular challenges within that industry. Further, his experience as a director of a variety of international public companies in several industries has enabled him to provide effective counsel to our board on many issues of concern to our management.

Martin L. Flanagan — Mr. Flanagan has spent over 26 years in the investment management industry, including roles as an investment professional and a series of executive management positions in business integration, strategic planning, investment operations, shareholder services and finance, with over six years spent as a CEO. Mr. Flanagan also obtained extensive financial accounting experience with a major international accounting firm. He also is a Chartered Financial Analyst. Through his decades of involvement, including as past chairman of our industry’s principal trade association, the Investment Company Institute, he has amassed a broad understanding of the larger context of investment management that has guided the Board during many critical junctures.

C. Robert Henrikson — Mr. Henrikson’s nearly 40 years of experience in the financial services industry, which includes diverse positions of increasing responsibility leading to his role as chief executive officer of MetLife, Inc., have provided him with an in-depth understanding of our industry.

Ben F. Johnson, III— Mr. Johnson brings to the Board more than a decade of experience leading one of the largest law firms in Atlanta, Georgia, where Invesco was founded and grew to prominence. His career as one of the region’s leading business litigators has given Mr. Johnson deep experience of the types of business and legal issues that are regularly faced by large public companies such as Invesco.

J. Thomas Presby— Mr. Presby has amassed considerable experience at the highest levels of finance and accounting, having served for three decades as a partner, as well as in positions of senior management (including chief operating officer), at one of the world’s largest accounting firms. In keeping with his experience, Mr. Presby has been sought by leading companies in a variety of industries to chair the audit committee, a role which he also fulfills for Invesco, where he is additionally recognized by the Board as one of our audit committee financial experts as defined under SEC rules.

Joseph R. Canion— Mr. Canion has extensive service as a board member within the investment management industry, having also served as a director of AIM Investments, a leading U.S. mutual fund manager,

from 1991 through 1997 when Invesco acquired AIM. Mr. Canion additionally has notable experience as an entrepreneur, having co-founded a business that grew into a major international technology company. We believe that his experience guiding a company throughout the entirety of its business lifecycle has given him a wide-ranging understanding of the types of issues faced by private and public companies.

Edward P. Lawrence— Mr. Lawrence has over thirty years’ experience as a corporate and business lawyer in a major Boston law firm, which has given him a very substantial understanding of the business issues facing large financial services companies such as Invesco. In particular, Mr. Lawrence specialized in issues arising under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 which provide the Federal legal framework for the company’s U.S. investment fund business. This background gives Mr. Lawrence an understanding of the potential legal ramifications of Board decisions which is particularly valuable to the Board’s functioning on many of the decisions it is called upon to take. As a member of his law firm’s trust investment practice and as member of investment committees of numerous entities, he also has had frequent interaction with investment advisers located throughout the country, giving him an opportunity to view a wide range of investment styles and practices.

James I. Robertson — Mr. Robertson has deep experience of the global fund management industry, having been the head of Invesco corporate development (including strategy and mergers and acquisitions) for Europe and Asia Pacific and then for the company worldwide. He also has a considerable understanding of the operational and finance aspects of our business, having served as head of the finance and operations functions for our European and Asia Pacific businesses before becoming chief financial officer and head of operations for our company. Due to his varied roles within Invesco’s management over the past 19 years, Mr. Robertson has an extensive understanding of many different facets of our organization, which give his participation in our Board’s deliberations significant weight.

Phoebe A. Wood — Ms. Wood has extensive experience as both a director and a member of senior financial management of public companies in a variety of industries. Her significant accounting, financial, and business expertise have made her a particularly valuable addition to our directors’ mix of skills, and she has been designated as one of our audit committee’s financial experts, as defined under SEC rules.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY

In addition to Messrs. Flanagan and Robertson, whose information is set forth above, the following is a list of individuals serving as executive officers of the company as of the date of this Proxy Statement. All company executive officers are elected annually by the Board and serve at the discretion of the Board or Chief Executive Officer.

G. Mark Armour(58) Senior Managing Director and Head of Invesco Institutional

Mark Armour has served as senior managing director and head of Invesco Institutional since January 2007. Previously, Mr. Armour served as head of sales and service for Invesco’s institutional operations. He was chief executive officer of Invesco Australia from September 2002 to July 2006. Prior to joining Invesco, Mr. Armour held significant leadership roles in the funds management business in both Australia and Hong Kong. He previously served as chief investment officer for ANZ Investments and spent almost 20 years with the National Mutual/AXA Australia Group, where he was chief executive, Funds Management, from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Armour received a bachelor of economics from La Trobe University in Melbourne, Australia.

Kevin M. Carome(55) Senior Managing Director and General Counsel

Kevin Carome has served as general counsel of our company since January 2006. Previously, he was senior vice president and general counsel of Invesco’s U.S. retail business from 2003 to 2005. Prior to joining Invesco,

Mr. Carome worked with Liberty Financial Companies, Inc. (LFC) in Boston where he was senior vice president and general counsel from August 2000 through December 2001. He joined LFC in 1993 as associate general counsel and, from 1998 through 2000, was general counsel of certain of its investment management subsidiaries. Mr. Carome began his career as an associate at Ropes & Gray in Boston. He received two degrees, a B.S. in political science and a J.D., from Boston College.

Karen Dunn Kelley (51) Senior Managing Director and Head of Invesco Fixed Income, Invesco Global Strategies, Global Equity/FX Trading and Investments

Karen Dunn Kelley is a senior managing director and head of Invesco Fixed Income, Invesco Global Strategies, Global Equity/FX Trading and Investments. Ms. Dunn Kelley joined Invesco in 1989 as a money market portfolio manager. In 1992, she was named chief money market and government officer. In April 2007, she was named head of Invesco’s newly combined fixed income and cash management teams. Ms. Dunn Kelley has been in the investment business since 1982 and began her career at Drexel Burnham Lambert on the Fixed Income High Grade Retail Desk. Ms. Dunn Kelley graduated with a B.S. from Villanova University College of Commerce and Finance.

Andrew T. S. Lo(50) Senior Managing Director and Head of Invesco Asia Pacific

Andrew Lo has served as head of Invesco Asia Pacific since February 2001. He joined our company as managing director for Invesco Asia in 1994. Mr. Lo began his career as a credit analyst at Chase Manhattan Bank in 1984. He became vice president of the investment management group at Citicorp in 1988 and was managing director of Capital House Asia from 1990 to 1994. Mr. Lo was chairman of the Hong Kong Investment Funds Association from 1996 to 1997 and a member of the Council to the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong and the Advisory Committee to the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong from 1997 to 2001. He received a B.S. and an MBA from Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts.

Colin D. Meadows(41) Senior Managing Director and Chief Administrative Officer

Colin Meadows has served as chief administrative officer of Invesco since May 2006 with responsibility for business strategy, human resources, and communications. In September 2008 he expanded his role with responsibilities for operations and technology. Mr. Meadows came to Invesco from GE Consumer Finance where he was senior vice president of business development and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to that role, he served as senior vice president of strategic planning and technology at Wells Fargo Bank. From 1996 to 2003, Mr. Meadows was an associate principal with McKinsey & Company, focusing on the financial services and venture capital industries, with an emphasis in the banking and asset management sectors. Mr. Meadows received a B.A. in economics and English literature from Andrews University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.

Loren M. Starr (50) Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

Loren Starr has served as senior managing director and chief financial officer of our company since October 2005. His current responsibilities include finance, accounting, investor relations and corporate services. Previously, he served from 2001 to 2005 as senior vice president and chief financial officer of Janus Capital Group Inc., after working as head of corporate finance from 1998 to 2001 at Putnam Investments. Prior to these positions, Mr. Starr held senior corporate finance roles with Lehman Brothers and Morgan Stanley & Co. He received a B.A. in chemistry and B.S. in industrial engineering, from Columbia University, as well as an MBA, also from Columbia, and an M.S. in operations research from Carnegie Mellon University. Mr. Starr is a certified treasury professional. He is a past chairman of the Association for Financial Professionals, and he currently serves on the boards of Georgia Leadership Institute for School Improvement (GLISI) and the Georgia Council for Economic Education (GCEE).

Philip A. Taylor(57) Senior Managing Director and Head of North American Retail

Philip Taylor became head of Invesco’s North American retail business in 2006. He had previously served as chief executive officer of Invesco Canada since 2002. He joined Invesco Canada in 1999 as senior vice president of operations and client services and later became executive vice president and chief operating officer. Mr. Taylor was president of Canadian retail broker Investors Group Securities and co-founder and managing partner of Meridian Securities, an execution and clearing broker. He held various management positions with Royal Trust, now part of Royal Bank of Canada. Mr. Taylor began his career in consumer brand management in the U.S. and Canada with Richardson-Vicks, now part of Procter & Gamble. He received a Bachelor of Commerce (honours) degree from Carleton University and an MBA from the Schulich School of Business at York University. Mr. Taylor is a member of the Dean’s Advisory council of the Schulich School of Business. He has been chair of the Toronto Symphony Orchestra and is currently on the board of the Royal Conservatory of Music.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines (“Guidelines”) and Terms of Reference for our chairmanChairman and chief executive officer,for our Chief Executive Officer, each of which is available in the corporate governance section of the company’s Web site atwww.invesco.com(the “company’s Web site”). The Corporate Governance Guidelines set forth the practices the Board follows with respect to, among other matters, the composition of the Board, director responsibilities, Board committees, director access to officers, employees and independent advisors, director compensation and performance evaluation of the Board.

Board Leadership Structure. As described in the Guidelines, the company’s business is conducted day-to-day by its officers, managers and employees, under the direction of the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and the oversight of the Board, to enhance the long-term value of the company for its shareholders. The Board is elected by the shareholders to oversee our management team and to assure that the long-term interests of the shareholders are being served. In light of these differences in the fundamental roles of the Board and management, the company has chosen to separate the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and Board chairman positions. The separation of these roles: (i) allows the Board to more effectively monitor and objectively evaluate the performance of the chief executive officer,Chief Executive Officer, such that the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer is more likely to be held accountable for his performance, (ii) allows the non-executive chairman to control the Board’s agenda and information flow, and (iii) creates an atmosphere in which other directors are more likely to challenge the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and other members of our senior management team. For these reasons, the company believes that this board leadership structure is currently the most appropriate structure for the company. Nevertheless, the Board may reassess the appropriateness of the existing structure at any time, including following changes in board composition, in management, or in the character of the company’s business and operations.

Code of Conduct and Directors’Directors Code of Conduct. As part of our ethics and compliance program, our Board has approved a code of ethics (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and persons performing similar functions, as well as to our other officers and employees. The Code of Conduct is posted on our company’s Web site. In addition, we have adopted a separate Directors’ Code of Conduct that applies to all members of the Board. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to, or a waiver of, a provision of the Code of Conduct for our principaldirectors and executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officerofficers by posting such information on our Web site. In addition, we have adopted a separate Directors’ Code of Conduct that applies to all members of the Board. The company maintains a compliance reporting line, where employees and individuals outside the company can anonymously submit a complaint or concern regarding compliance with applicable laws, rules or regulations, the Code of Conduct, as well as accounting, auditing, ethical or other concerns.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight.The Board has principal responsibility for oversight of the company’s risk management processes and for understanding the overall risk profile of the company. Though Board committees

routinely address specific risks and risk processes within their purview, the Board has not delegated primary risk oversight responsibility to a committee.

Our risk management framework provides the basis for consistent and meaningful risk dialogue up, down and across the company. Our Global Performance Measurement and Risk group assesses core investment risks. Our Corporate Risk Management Committee assesses strategic, operational and all other business risks. A network of business unit, functional and geographic risk management committees under the auspices of the Corporate Risk Management Committee maintains an ongoing risk assessment process that provides a bottom-up perspective on the specific risk areas existing in various domains of our business.

At each Board meeting, the Board reviews and discusses with senior management information pertaining to risk provided by the Global Performance Measurement and Risk group and the Corporate Risk Management Committee. In these sessions senior management reviews and discusses with the Board the salientmost significant risks facing the company. The Board has also reviewed and approved risk tolerance

guidelines. By receiving these regular reports, the Board maintains a practical understanding of the risk philosophy and risk tolerance of the company. Through this regular and consistent risk communication, the Board has reasonable assurance that all material risks of the company are being addressed and that the company is propagating a risk-aware culture in which effective risk management is built into the fabric of the business.

The Board, with the assistance of the Compensation Committee has evaluated our compensation policies and practices for all employees and has concluded that such policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company. In reaching this conclusion, we undertook the following process to evaluate our compensation policies and practices:

The Audit Committee routinely receives reports from the control functions of finance, legal and compliance and internal audit. The Head of Internal Audit reports to the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee oversees the internal audit function’s planning and resource allocation in a manner designed to ensure testing of controls and other Internal Audit activities are appropriately prioritized in a risk-based manner. The Audit Committee also seeks to assure that appropriate risk-based inputs from management and internal audit are communicated to the company’s independent public auditors.

INFORMATION ABOUT THE BOARD AND ITS COMMITTEESInformation about the Board and Its Committees

BOARD MEETINGS AND ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERSBoard Meetings and Annual General Meeting of Shareholders

During the calendar year ended December 31, 2011,2013, the Board held ten meetings (not including committee meetings). Each director attended at least seventy-five percent (75%) of the aggregate of the total number of meetings held by the Board and the total number of meetings held by all committees of the Board on which he or she served during 2011.2013. The Board does not have a formal policy regarding Board member attendance at shareholder meetings. AllEight of our ten directors then in office attended the 2011 annual general meeting.2013 Annual General Meeting. Those not attending the meeting were unable to be present due to travel schedules. The non-executive directors (those directors who are not officers or employees of the company) meet in executive session at least once per year during a regularly scheduled Board meeting without management. Rex D. Adams, a non-executive and independent director, presides at the executive sessions of the non-executive directors. As previously announced, the Board has elected Ben F. Johnson III to serve as Chairman of the Board following the expiration of the term of Mr. Adams at the conclusion of this year’s Annual General Meeting.

COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND MEETINGSCommittee Membership and Meetings

The current committees of the Board are the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee. The table below provides current membership information.

M — Member

C — Chairman

Below is a description of each committee of the Board. The Board has affirmatively determined that each committee consists entirely of independent directors pursuantaccording to applicable NYSE rules established by the NYSE and rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

THE AUDIT COMMITTEEThe Audit Committee

The Audit Committee is chaired by Mr. Presby and consists additionally of Messrs. Banham, Henrikson, Johnson, Kessler, and Lawrence, Wagoner and Ms. Wood. The committee met eleventwelve times during 2011.2013. (The frequency of the committee’s meetings is due to its practice of separately considering certain matters, such as pre-filing review of quarterly reports, among others, in order to devote ample time for discussion and consideration.) Under its charter, the committee:

The committee’s charter is available on the company’s Web site. The charter sets forth the committee’s responsibilities, which include:

The committee has adopted policies and procedures for pre-approving all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors. The policy is designed to ensure that the auditor’s independence is not impaired. The policy provides that, before the company engages the independent auditor to render any service, the engagement must either be specifically approved by the Audit Committee or fall into one of the defined categories that have been pre-approved. (See the section of this Proxy Statement below entitled “PRE-APPROVAL PROCESS AND POLICY.“Pre-Approval Process and Policy” below.)

The Board has determined that all committee members are financially literate under the NYSE listing standards. The Board has further determined that each of Mr. Presby and Ms. Wood qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” (as defined under the SEC’s rules and regulations), that each has “accounting or related financial management expertise” and that each is “independent” of the company under SEC rules and the NYSE listing rules. The Board has also determined that Mr. Presby’s service on the audit committees of more than three public companies does not impair his ability to effectively serve on the Audit Committee.

THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEEThe Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee is chaired by Sir John Banham and consists additionally of Messrs. Adams, Henrikson, Johnson, Kessler, Lawrence, Wagoner and Ms. Wood. The committee met six times during 2011.2013. As previously discussed, Mr. Henrikson has been appointed as chairman of the committee effective upon the close of the 2014 Annual General Meeting. Under its charter, the committee:

The committee’s charter is available on the company’s Web site. The charter sets forth the committee’s responsibilities, which include:

Each year the committee engages a third-party compensation consultant to provide an analysis of, and counsel on, the company’s executive compensation program and practices. The nature and scope of the consultant’s assignment is set by the committee. The committee currently engages Johnson Associates, Inc. (“Johnson Associates”) as its third-party consultant for this review. The committee has considered various factors as required by NYSE rules as to whether the work of Johnson Associates with respect to executive and director compensation-related matters raised any conflict of interest. The committee has determined no conflict of interest was raised by the engagement of Johnson Associates. For a more detailed discussion of the determination of executive compensation and the role of the third-party compensation consultant, please see the section of this Proxy Statement below entitled “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION“Executive Compensation — Compensation Discussion and Analysis.Analysis” below.

The committee meets at least annually to review and determine the compensation of the company’s non-executive directors. In reviewing and determining non-executive director compensation, the Committeecommittee considers, among other things, the following policies and principles:

As a part of its review, the committee periodically engages Johnson Associates as a third-party consultant to report on comparable non-executive director compensation practices and levels. No executive officer of the company is

involved in determining or recommending non-executive director compensation levels. See the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “DIRECTOR COMPENSATION”“Director Compensation” below, for a more detailed discussion of compensation paid to the company’s directors during 2011.2013.

THE NOMINATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEEThe Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nomination and Corporate Governance Committee is chaired by Mr. Adams and consists additionally of Messrs. Banham, Canion, Henrikson, Johnson, Kessler, Lawrence, Presby, Wagoner and Ms. Wood. As previously discussed, Mr. Canion has been appointed as chairman of the committee effective upon the close of the 2014 Annual General Meeting. The committee met five times during 2011.2013. Under its charter, the committee:

The committee’s charter is available on the company’s Web site. The charter sets forth the committee’s responsibilities, which include:

The candidates proposed for election in Proposal No. 12 of this Proxy Statement were unanimously recommended by the committee to the Board.

The committee believes there are certain minimum qualifications that each director nominee must satisfy in order to be suitable for a position on the Board, including that such nominee:

In considering candidates for director nominee, the committee generally assembles all information regarding a candidate’s background and qualifications, evaluates a candidate’s mix of skills and qualifications

and determines the contribution that the candidate could be expected to make to the overall functioning of the Board, giving due consideration to the Board balance of diversity of perspectives, backgrounds and experiences. While the committee routinely considers diversity as a part of its deliberations, it has no formal policy regarding diversity. With respect to current directors, the committee considers past participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board. The committee recommends director nominees to the Board based on its assessment of overall suitability to serve in accordance with the company’s policy regarding nominations and qualifications of directors.

The committee will consider candidates recommended for nomination to the Board by shareholders of the company. Shareholders may nominate candidates for election to the Board under Bermuda law and our Bye-Laws. Under our Bye-Laws, notice of such a proposal must generally be provided to the Company Secretary not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual general meeting. In addition, our Bye-Laws contain additional requirements applicable to any shareholder nomination, including a description of the information that must be included with any such proposal. For further information regarding deadlines for shareholder proposals, please see the section of this proxy statement below entitled “ADDITIONAL INFORMATION — Shareholder Proposals for the 2013 Annual General Meeting.” The manner in which the committee evaluates candidates recommended by shareholders would be generally the same as any other candidate. However, the committee would also seek and consider information concerning any relationship between a shareholder recommending a candidate and the candidate to determine if the candidate can represent the interests of all of the shareholders. The committee would not evaluate a candidate recommended by a shareholder unless the shareholder’s proposal provides that the potential candidate has indicated a willingness to serve as a director, to comply with the expectations and requirements for Board service as publicly disclosed by the company and to provide all of the information necessary to conduct an evaluation.

The committee believes there are certain minimum qualifications that each director nominee must satisfy in order to be suitable for a position on the Board, including:

In considering candidates for director nominee, the committee generally assembles all For further information regarding a candidate’s background and qualifications, evaluates a candidate’s mix of skills and qualifications and determinessuch deadlines for shareholder proposals, see “Important Additional Information — Shareholder Proposals for the contribution that the candidate could be expected to make to the overall functioning of the Board, giving due consideration to the Board balance of diversity of perspectives, backgrounds and experiences. While the committee routinely considers diversity as a part of its deliberations, it has no formal policy regarding diversity. With respect to current directors, the committee considers past participation in and contributions to the activities of the Board. The committee recommends director nominees to the Board based on its assessment of overall suitability to serve in accordance with the company’s policy regarding nominations and qualifications of directors.2015 Annual General Meeting” below.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATIONDirector Compensation

Directors who are Invesco employees do not receive compensation for their services as directors. TheUnder the terms of its charter, the Compensation Committee annually reviews and determines the compensation paid to non-executive directors. Directors do not receive any meeting or attendance fees.

The Compensation Committee approved the following fee arrangements for non-executive directors for 2011:2013, with each fee component to be paid in quarterly installments in arrears:

Director Fees PaidWe also reimburse each of our non-executive directors for their travel expenses incurred in Shares — Eachconnection with attendance at Board of Directors and committee meetings.

Following a review of current market practices for directors of peer public companies, the Compensation Committee determined in December 2013 that the basic shares fee for non-executive director also receivesdirectors will increase to an annual award of shares in the aggregate amount of $95,000. Such$145,000, with such shares are paidto be issued in arrears in four quarterly installments of $23,750. Each installment is paid on the second business day following the public announcement of the company’s quarterly earnings results. (By way of example, the payment for the fourth quarter is paid in the first quarter of the following year after publication of the earnings release for the fourth quarter.)

The Compensation Committee determined in December 2011 that directorsan amount equal to $36,250. All other fees will remain the same for 2012.

Stock Ownership Policy for Non-Executive Directors— All shares awardedgranted to our non-executive directors are subject to the Non-Executive Director Stock Ownership Policy, which was adopted by the Board of Directors in December 2010.Policy. The policy generally requires each non-executive director to achieve an ownership level of at least 18,000 shares within seven years of the later of the effective date of the policy and the date of such director’s first appointment as a non-executive director. Until such ownership level is achieved, each non-executive director is generally required to continue to hold 100% of the shares received as compensation from the company prior to the policy’s effective date and to retain at least 50% of all shares received as compensation from the company following such date.enactment of the ownership policy.

AsThe following table shows as of December 31, 2011, all2013 the status of our non-executive directors other than Mr. Johnson and Ms. Wood had exceededmeeting the share ownership requirement. It is anticipated that Mr. Johnson and Ms. Wood will attainrequirements of the share ownership goal in two and three years, respectively. Mr. Henrikson became a non-executive director effective January 1, 2012, and it is anticipated that he will attain the required share ownership level within seven years of his appointment.policy.

Director Compensation Table for 20112013

The following table sets forth the compensation paid to our non-executive directors for services during 2011.2013.

The following table presents the grant date fair value for each share award made to each non-executive director during 2011.2013.

(1)	Mr. Wagoner joined our Board in October 2013 and did not receive any compensation in 2013.

The aggregate number of share awards outstanding atas of December 31, 20112013 for each of our non-executive directors was as follows:

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

The following table sets forth the common shares beneficially owned as of March 30, 2012 by each shareholder known to us to beneficially own more than five percent of the company’s outstanding common shares. The percentage of ownership indicated in the following table is based on 445,969,597 common shares outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT

The following table lists the common shares beneficially owned as of December 31, 2011 by (1) each director and director nominee, (2) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (3) all current directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group. The percentage of ownership indicated in the following table is based on 445,969,597 of the company’s common shares outstanding on December 31, 2011.

Beneficial ownership reported in the below table has been determined according to SEC regulations and includes common shares that may be acquired within 60 days after December 31, 2011, upon the exercise of outstanding share options, but excludes deferred shares which are disclosed in a separate column. Unless otherwise indicated, all directors, director nominees and executive officers have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown. No shares are pledged as security. As of December 31, 2011, no individual director, director nominee or named executive officer owned beneficially 1% or more of our common shares, and our directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group owned approximately 1.95% of our common shares outstanding.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONInformation about

Compensation Discussionthe Executive Officers of the Company

In addition to Martin Flanagan, whose information is set forth above, the following is a list of individuals serving as executive officers of the company as of the date of this Proxy Statement. All company executive officers are elected annually by the Board and Analysis

serve at the discretion of the Board or our Chief Executive SummaryOfficer.

Senior Managing       Director and Head of       Invesco Asia Pacific		Andrew T. S. Lo (52) has served as head of Invesco Asia Pacific since February 2001. He joined our company as managing director for Invesco Asia in 1994. Mr. Lo began his career as a credit analyst at Chase Manhattan Bank in 1984. He became vice president of the investment management group at Citicorp in 1988 and was managing director of Capital House Asia from 1990 to 1994. Mr. Lo was chairman of the Hong Kong Investment Funds Association from 1996 to 1997 and a member of the Council to the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong and the Advisory Committee to the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong from 1997 to 2001. He earned a B.S. and an MBA from Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts.
Senior Managing       Director and Chief       Administrative Officer		Colin Meadows (43) has served as chief administrative officer of Invesco since May 2006 with responsibility for business strategy, human resources, and communications. In September 2008 he expanded his role with responsibilities for operations and technology. Mr. Meadows came to Invesco from GE Consumer Finance where he was senior vice president of business development and mergers and acquisitions. Prior to that role, he served as senior vice president of strategic planning and technology at Wells Fargo Bank. From 1996 to 2003, Mr. Meadows was an associate principal with McKinsey & Company, focusing on the financial services and venture capital industries, with an emphasis in the banking and asset management sectors. Mr. Meadows earned a B.A. in economics and English literature from Andrews University and a J.D. from Harvard Law School.
Senior Managing       Director and Chief       Financial Officer		Loren Starr (52) has served as senior managing director and chief financial officer of our company since October 2005. His current responsibilities include finance, accounting, investor relations and corporate services. Previously, he served from 2001 to 2005 as senior vice president and chief financial officer of Janus Capital Group Inc., after working as head of corporate finance from 1998 to 2001 at Putnam Investments. Prior to these positions, Mr. Starr held senior corporate finance roles with Lehman Brothers and Morgan Stanley & Co. He earned a B.A. in chemistry and B.S. in industrial engineering, from Columbia University, as well as an MBA from Columbia, and an M.S. in operations research from Carnegie Mellon University. Mr. Starr is a certified treasury professional. He is a past chairman of the Association for Financial Professionals, and he currently serves on the boards of Georgia Leadership Institute for School Improvement (GLISI), the Georgia Council for Economic Education (GCEE) and the next three most highly compensated executive officers (our “named executive officers” or “NEOs”).Woodruff Arts Center.
Invesco’s compensation programs, including particularly our annual incentive pools, are tied to      Senior Managing       Director and Head of       the achievement of our strategic and financial results and our success in serving our clients’ and shareholders’ interests. As further described below, despite continued global market volatility, Invesco performed strongly in 2011, with material increases in certain key financial measures. Our results were also driven in part by a major acquisition in June 2010, the integration of which was largely completed in 2011.While our financial results were strong, and we continued to make substantial progress against our strategic objectives, the committee determined that our company-wide incentive pools should remain generally unchanged from last year on an average per-person basis. This determination reflected the committee’s balancing of the company’s objectives to invest in key strategic growth initiatives, to attract and retain high-performing employees and to deliver appropriate returns to our shareholders. In light of the above, the committee determined to leave incentive compensation for our named executive officers at the same level as, or slightly lower than, last year and to maintain their salaries at substantially the same levels in place since 2007. For more information regarding our incentive pools and how they are determined, see the caption “How Compensation is Determined for Our Executive Officers” below.Americas
What Is New in 2011		ConsiderationPhilip Taylor (59) became head of 2011 Say-on-Pay Vote. In establishing 2011 compensation for ourInvesco’s Americas business in 2012. He had previously served as head of Invesco’s North American Retail business since 2006. He joined Invesco Canada in 1999 as senior vice president of operations and client services, and later became executive vice president and chief operating officer. He was named chief executive officers,officer of Invesco Canada in 2002. Prior to joining Invesco, Mr. Taylor was president of Canadian retail broker Investors Group Securities, and co-founder and managing partner of Meridian Securities, an execution and clearing broker. He held various management positions with Royal Trust, now part of Royal Bank of Canada. Mr. Taylor began his career in consumer brand management in the committee considered discussions that were heldU.S. and Canada with shareholders prior toRichardson-Vicks, now part of Procter & Gamble. He received a Bachelor of Commerce (honours) degree from Carleton University and an M.B.A. from the advisory vote and reviewed the resultsSchulich School of Business at York University. Mr. Taylor is a member of the dean’s advisory votecouncil of the Schulich School of Business. He serves on executive compensation (“say-on-pay vote”) held at last year’s annual meeting. While the say-on-pay vote passed with a majorityboard of shareholders in favor (56% in favor), the committee sought to understand the reasonsoverseers for the low majority by conducting, via senior management, discussions with our largest shareholders to identify any concerns regarding our executive compensation practicesCurtis Institute of Music and constructively address them.on the board of the Royal Conservatory of Music.

Executive Compensation

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In addition to discussions with our shareholders, the committee implemented the following improvements to our compensation programs:

• adopted equity award vesting provisions based on achievement of targeted financial measures for a portion of the 2011 long-term incentive awards to executive officers, as described in detail below;

• greatly enhanced the disclosure of our prudent and longstanding process by which compensation decisions for executive officers are made by the committee; and

• adopted a “clawback” policy applicable to our executive officers’ long-term equity awards subject to achievement of targeted financial results, as described in detail below, which permits the company to recover compensation based on fraudulent or willful misconduct.

This section presents a discussion and analysis of the philosophy and objectives of our Board’s Compensation Committee (the “committee”) in designing and implementing compensation programs for our executive officers. In addition, this section describes and analyzes the 2013 compensation determinations relating to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the next three most highly compensated executive officers (our “named executive officers” or “NEOs”).

30% of each executive officer’s 2011 long-term equity award is subject to vesting only if certain financial measures are achieved during the award’s vesting periods

Executive Summary (cont’d)

Progress Against Our Strategic Objectives

Throughout the year, we continued to make substantial progress against our long-term strategic objectives set forth below. Significant achievements across all areas of our business that further positioned us for growth and long-term success included:

Achieve strong investment performance — Investment performance across the company remained strong throughout 2013. Delivering strong, long-term investment performance to clients contributed to strong organic growth throughout the year.

Be instrumental in our clients’ success — Further strengthened and deepened client relationships through superior client engagement. The company made solid progress building world-class fixed income capabilities through the creation of a global fixed income capability, which contributed to record AUM levels in Bank Loans, Stable Value and Investment Grade portfolios. The company further expanded its Exchange-Traded Fund (“ETF”) franchise, which contributed to record AUM levels for its ETF portfolio. Additionally, the company continued to anticipate client demand by expanding its global investment strategies through the introduction of new multi-asset capabilities and liquid alternative products that we believe will benefit clients and our business over the long term.

Harness the power of our global platform— As a demonstration of our ability to leverage our global platform, in 2013 Invesco launched a number of new capabilities globally that support the future growth of the firm. In fact, Invesco launched more funds during the fourth quarter than we did in any full calendar year over the past five years.

Perpetuate a high-performance organization — Successfully implemented key organizational changes to better align us with future growth opportunities, increased collaboration across regions, and significantly reinvested in employee talent through additional focus on performance leadership and succession planning. Invesco’s employee engagement scores continued to exceed benchmarks set by high performing companies worldwide, as reflected in data from a third-party administered employee survey.

Our Compensation Practices

Below we highlight certain executive compensation practices that are designed to align executive pay with performance, ensure good governance, and serve our shareholders’ long-term interests.

What We Do

Pay for performance.We tie pay to the performance of the company and the individual. The great majority of executive compensation is not guaranteed and is variable.

Strong emphasis on deferred compensation.Compensation for our executive officers. In orderofficers is heavily weighted to further align employeedeferred compensation (60-70%), consisting of annual stock deferral and shareholder interests,

long-term equity awards that vest over four years. Base salaries for our executive officers average approximately 10% of their total annual compensation.

the committee has determined that a portionPerformance-based long-term equity awards.30% of such awards for executive officers should be paid only upon achievement of targeted company financial results. Vesting of the financial measures-based portion (30%) of the 2011 long-term equity awards for executive officers is tied to the achievement of specified levels of adjusted operating margin or adjusted diluted earnings per share.1 For more information regarding the long-term equity awards made to our executive officers, including our named executive officers, see the caption “About Our Performance-Based Long-Term Equity Awards” below.

		Long vesting periods. Our equity awards generally vest in annual tranches over a four-year period.

What Has Remained the Same in 2011

Linkage of incentive compensation pool to PCBOI.We have maintained our commitment to aligning executive compensation with financial and strategic results, including: • a robust and prudent process undertaken by the committee to align compensation with financial and strategic performance over the long-term; • a history of disciplined decision-making over multiple years and through various economic cycles, including directly linking the

Executive Summary (cont’d)

aggregate incentive compensation poolspool to a narrowdefined range of our pre-cash bonus operating income (“PCBOI”),; thereby ensuring incentive compensation is paid only when we arethe company is generating operating income; income.

 

• base salaries for our NEOs limited

“Clawback” policy.The company maintains a “clawback” policy applicable to on average approximately 10% of their total annual compensation; and • compensation for our executive officers that is heavily weightedofficers’ performance-based long-term equity awards which permits the company to deferredrecover compensation (60-70%) — in the formevent of equity awards that vest over four (4) years, a portion of which is tied to the financial performance of Invesco, and is thus aligned with the interests offraudulent or willful misconduct. For more information regarding our shareholders. clawback policy, see “Clawback Policy” below.

 

Share ownership guidelines.We have continued our sound governance practices,including: • maintainingmaintain robust share ownership guidelines for our directors and executive officers, thereby creating a clearfurther link between management interests, company performance and shareholder value; value. Shares must be held until share ownership guidelines are met. All of our executive officers have exceeded the ownership requirements. For more information regarding our share ownership guidelines, see “Share Ownership Guidelines” below.

 

• continuing not to provide excise tax “gross ups;

“Double triggers.” • maintaining the requirement ofWe maintain a “double triggers”trigger” requirement on the vesting of equity awards in the event of a change in control;control, meaning that an equity award holder must be terminated following the change in control before vesting will be accelerated.

Modest perquisites.We provide modest perquisites that provide a sound benefit to the company’s business.

Independent compensation committee consultant.Our independent compensation consultant, Johnson Associates, Inc., is retained directly by the committee and performs no other services for the company.

What We Don’t Do

 

• maintaining

No dividends or dividend equivalents on unearned performance-based awards.No dividends or dividend equivalents are paid on performance-based awards during the vesting period. Rather, dividends are deferred and are paid based on performance achieved, with no premiums.

No gross ups.We do not generally provide excise tax “gross ups,” other than in the case of certain relocation expenses, consistent with our relocation policy.

No short selling or hedging.Our insider trading policy thatstrictly prohibits short selling, dealing in publicly-traded options and hedging or monetization transactions in our common shares; and shares.

 

• including in our

No option re-pricing.Our equity incentive plans contain certain provisions prohibiting option re-pricingrepricing absent approval of our shareholders.

Results of 2013 Say-on-Pay Vote and Our Investor Outreach Program

1	Adjusted operating margin and adjusted diluted earnings per share are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see pages 56 through 60 of our Annual Report for a presentation of, and reconciliation to, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

At the 2013 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, 95.8% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory proposal to approve our NEO compensation, (the “Say-on-Pay” advisory proposal). Although we believe that the 2013 vote conveyed our shareholders’ strong support of the committee’s decisions and the existing executive compensation programs, during the balance of 2013 and early 2014, we continued to actively seek investor feedback concerning our compensation programs by holding meetings with a significant number of our largest shareholders. While all of the shareholders we spoke with agree on the importance of pay and performance alignment, there was no consensus among these shareholders on how alignment should be measured. A number of the shareholders indicated that their Say-on-Pay decisions are made on a case-by-case basis and that they have not had any issues with Invesco’s compensation in prior years, some noting in particular that they believe appropriate decisions have been made for NEO compensation. Our largest shareholders do not share a consistent philosophy regarding the structure of compensation. That said, all shareholders affirmed the importance of clear disclosure and transparency regarding the decision making process undertaken by the committee. Based on this feedback the committee determined to continue our current compensation practices as described in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Executive SummaryOur Compensation Philosophy

To support our long-term strategic objectives, we have structured our compensation programs at every level to achieve the following objectives:

2011 Financial Performance

Along with the rest of our industry, Invesco was challenged during 2011 by extremely volatile global markets and a global economy that continues to be under pressure. In spite of the volatility of world financial markets, Invesco remains very well positioned to succeed over the long term:   •  our investment performance is solid, as evidenced by positive investment flows in 2011;   •  we have built a strong global operating platform; and   •  we have a global, diversified client base and a comprehensive range of capabilities and products.   Despite continued global market volatility, our senior management team guided the company to achieve solid improvements during 2011 in key measures of our financial performance, as shown below.

Measure1

2011 Actual  Results2

Change from 20102

2010 Actual Results2

2009 Actual Results

Assets Under Management (“AUM”) as of December 31

$625B

+1.3%

$617B

$460B

Adjusted Operating Income

$1,069M

+19.0%

$898M

$566M

Adjusted Operating Margin

36.9%

+1.3 pts

35.6%

29.1%

Adjusted Diluted EPS

$1.68

+21.7%

$1.38

$0.89

2011 Progress Against Our Strategic Objectives		Throughout the year, we continued to make substantial progress against our long-term strategic objectives. Significant achievements across all areas of our business further positioned us for growth and long-term success, including: •  continued superior investment performance for our clients; •  focusing on strengthening and deepening relationships with our clients; •  further enhancement of our ability to meet client needs by focusing product offerings and pursuing targeted expansion in areas of strong investor demand; •  continued successful integration of a major acquisition; •  successfully implementing major organizational changes, resulting in increased collaboration across regions and greater leveraging of global support capabilities; and •  significantly reinvesting in employee talent through continued internal development and a number of strategic new hires.

align individual awards with shareholder and client success;

 

1	Adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin and adjusted diluted earnings per share are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see pages 56 through 60 of our Annual Report, for a presentation of, and reconciliation to, the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

reinforce our commercial viability by closely linking rewards to results at every level;

 

2	The 2011 results include a full year of activity for the acquired Morgan Stanley retail asset management business. The 2010 results include seven months of activity following the June 1, 2010 acquisition.

reinforce our meritocracy by differentially rewarding high-performers; and

Martin L. Flanagan, CEO

recognize and President

2011 Total Compensation*

Change from Prior Year

$12.89M 0%

* Consistsretain top talent by ensuring a meaningful mix of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award earned in 2011 — see note on p.32 regarding differences from the Summarydeferred compensation vehicles.

Determining Compensation Table (“SCT”)of Our Executive Officers

Executive SummaryRole of the Compensation Committee

The committee has, among other duties, responsibility for determining the components and amounts of compensation paid to our executive officers, including our named executive officers. The committee’s responsibilities include:

 

Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation		Our chief executive officer’s total annual compensation for 2011 remained
		unchanged compared to his total compensation for 2010. While our financial results were strong in 2011, and we continued to make substantial progress against our strategic objectives, the committee determined to not increase compensation for the CEO in light of the relatively unchanged 2011 firm-wide incentive pools on an average per-person basis, as compared to last year.
		Total annual compensation for 2011 for our other named executive officers similarly remained unchanged or decreased slightly compared to 2010. For more information regarding each other named executive officer’s annual compensation, see the caption “2011 Named Executive Officer reviewing and making recommendations to the Board about the company’s overall compensation philosophy; approving company-wide annual compensation; evaluating the performance of, and setting the compensation for, the Chief Executive Officer; and reviewing and overseeing management’s annual process for evaluating the performance of, and approving the compensation for, all other executive officers, including our other named executive officers. The committee’s philosophy in practice delivers a significant portion of total pay through incentive compensation. The majority of incentive compensation is deferred and tied to financial and strategic performance in order to align individual rewards with client and shareholder success. In determining the compensation levels, the committee considers the achievement of strategic objectives, the success in executing annual objectives, year-over-year operating results, operating margin, year-over-year earnings per share and operating results versus peers. In addition, the committee considers the competitive environment and the economic cycle. All incentive compensation is constrained by the range of PCBOI to ensure, at all times, the incentive pool is linked to Invesco’s operating results. The committee makes its compensation decisions based upon the totality of the results without tying such decisions to a specific formula. The committee believes that this holistic approach, which incorporates fact-based qualitative judgments based upon the factors described above, is more effective than purely mechanical formula criteria. Role of the Compensation Consultant The committee’s charter gives it the authority to retain consultants and other advisors to assist it in performing its duties. The committee has engaged Johnson Associates, Inc., an independent consulting firm, to advise it on director and executive compensation matters. Johnson Associates: attends certain meetings of the committee and periodically meets with the committee without members of management present; assists the committee throughout the year in its analysis and evaluation of our overall executive compensation programs, including compensation paid to our directors and executive officers; provides the committee with certain market data and analysis that compares executive compensation paid by the company with that paid by other firms in the financial services industry and certain investment management firms which we consider generally comparable to us; and provides commentary regarding market conditions, market impressions and compensation trends. The committee uses such data as reference material to assist it in gaining a general awareness of industry compensation standards and trends. The market data, including performance and pay practices of the peer group and broader investment management firms, do not directly affect the committee’s compensation determinations for our executive officers, including our named executive officers. Although we seek to offer to our executive officers a level of total compensation that is competitive, the committee does not target a particular percentile of market or the peer group with respect to total pay packages or any individual components thereof. The committee’s consideration of the market data constitutes only one of many factors reviewed and such market data is considered generally and not as a substitute for the committee’s independent judgment in making compensation decisions regarding our executive officers. Under the terms of its engagement with the committee, Johnson Associates does not provide any other services to the company unless the committee has approved such services. No such other services were provided in 2013. The company uses other compensation and benefits consultants to provide market data, actuarial services and/or advice relating to broad management employee programs in which named executive officers may participate. Review of Peer Compensation” below.
How Compensation is Determined for Our Executive Officers		The committee utilizes the following compensation principles in its decision-making process. •    Our compensation programs are designed, structured and implemented at every level to align with our long-term strategic priorities. Specifically, we: •    align incentive awards with client and shareholder success; •    provide competitive compensation tied to strategic and financial results; •    closely link rewards to financial and strategic results; •    differentially reward high performers; and •    provide an appropriate mix of cash and deferred compensation. •    We recognize that our employees are critical to our success. We benefit from a stable management team who have guided our company through several years of global financial market uncertainty and volatility. As an investment management firm, one of our greatest assets is the skill and experience of our employees. It is critical that we are able to attract, retain and motivate talented professionals while aligning their incentives with the interests of our clients and shareholders. •    The dominant portion of an executive officer’s compensation should be variable, reflecting the company’s results on an annual basis and over multi-year periods. Share ownership by our executive officers, as well as linking the vesting of a portion of equity awards to targeted financial results, provide a clear link between management interests, company performance and shareholder value.

 

		In determining executive compensation, the committee reviews the executive compensation programs and levels of our industry peer companies, as well as other comparable investment management reference companies. Our industry peers (see box)box to the right) consist of companies in the S&P 500 and S&P 400 that are also in the Asset Management and Custody Bank sub-index, plus AllianceBernstein L. P.L.P., a competitor not in this sub-index but which is another global asset manager followed by industry analysts.

Role of Executive Officers in Determining Executive Compensation

Our Chief Executive Officer meets with the non-executive directors (including the members of the committee) throughout the year to discuss executive performance and compensation matters, including proposals relative to compensation for individual executive officers (other than the Chief Executive Officer). Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Administrative Officer work with the committee to implement our compensation philosophy. They also provide to the committee information regarding financial and investment performance of the company as well as our progress toward our long-term strategic objectives. Our Chief Financial Officer assists as needed in explaining specific aspects of the company’s financial performance.

Setting Annual Incentive Compensation Pool

Based upon the above principles and processes, at regular intervals during the year, the committee examines the company’s progress on multiple operating measures, which include client success and financial measures, including PCBOI, adjusted operating margin, assets under management and adjusted

diluted earnings per share, as well as key measures, such as the company’s progress toward achieving its strategic objectives. While each of these items is considered by the committee, the committee does not attempt to rank or assign relative weight to any factor but rather applies its judgment in considering them in their entirety. The committee is focused on the totality of organizational success without tying compensation decisions to a specific formula.

Following the end of the fiscal year, the committee establishes an overall company-wide incentive pool within established guidelines described below to ensure that compensation is aligned with the financial and strategic results discussed above. The pool is comprised of a cash bonus pool and a deferred compensation pool (consisting of annual stock deferral and long-term equity awards that vest over four years). All 2013 awards, including NEO awards, were paid out of these incentive pools.

For more information regarding annual stock deferral awards and long-term equity awards, see “Components of Executive Compensation and Their Purpose” and “Our Industry Peer CompaniesPerformance-Based Long-Term Equity Awards” below.

Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.The committee annually sets parameters, used consistently for many years, to guide the end-of-year decision-making process regarding the company-wide incentive pool size. These parameters are expressed as a percentage of PCBOI. The committee uses a range of 34-48% of PCBOI, in the aggregate, in setting the company-wide incentive pool, though it maintains the flexibility to go outside either end of this range in circumstances that it deems exceptional. The range includes the cash bonus and deferred compensation pools, as well as the amounts paid under sales commission plans (in which our NEOs do not participate). The range was determined based on historical data concerning the practices of our peer group as analyzed by Johnson Associates and based on data obtained from the McLagan and CaseyQuirk Performance Intelligence Study.

AllianceBernstein L.P.Over the past five years, the aggregate incentive pool has averaged approximately 44% of PCBOI. Utilizing its judgment, and applying discretion based upon the company’s financial results and progress toward strategic objectives during 2013, the committee set the company-wide incentive pool for 2013 at approximately 41% of PCBOI (compared to 44% of PCBOI for 2012). The committee decided:

Ameriprise Financial

the cash bonus pool would increase this year as a result of the increase in operating income – although not at the same rate as the increase in operating income, given decisions made earlier in the year by the Board to return value to shareholders (through dividends and share buybacks) and to further invest in the long-term success of the company; and

with respect to the deferred compensation pool, annual stock deferral awards would increase consistent with the cash bonus pool and long-term equity awards would generally remain unchanged from last year (on an average per person basis) to continue to tie the interests of our employees to the long-term interests of our shareholders.

For more information regarding the company’s financial results and our achievement of strategic objectives for 2013, see “2013 Performance Highlights”and “Progress Against Our Strategic Objectives” above.

Bank

Components of New York MellonExecutive Compensation and Their Purpose

BlackRock, Inc.The compensation program for our executive officers, including the NEOs, consists primarily of base salary and variable incentive compensation. The committee believes that a majority of our NEOs’ pay should be incentive compensation – consisting of a combination of annual cash bonuses, annual stock deferral awards, and long-term equity awards – all of which are linked to the achievement of the company’s financial and strategic objectives. The following table further describes each component of executive compensation, as well as its purpose and key measures.

Eaton Vance

Federated Investors, Inc.

Franklin Resources

Janus Capital Group

Legg Mason Inc.

Northern Trust Corp.

SEI Investment Company

State Street

T. Rowe Price Group

Information provided by the committee’s consultant.Incentive Johnson Associates advises the committee on director and executive officer compensation by, among other matters: Type		Pay Element		What It Does		Key Measures
FIXED		Base salary		•Provides competitive fixed pay   •  providing the committee with certain information Limited to a reasonable basecompensation for day-to-day performance of job responsibilities •Evaluated annually, generally remains static unless promotion or adjustment is necessary due to economic trends in industry		•Experience, duties and scope of responsibility •Internal and external market factors •Reviewed annually
VARIABLE		Annual cash bonus		comparing the compensation of our executive officers to that of comparable positions at our industry peer companies and certain private companies or divisions of broader financial services firms; and•Provides a competitive annual incentive opportunity		•  applying various techniques to adjust the data for differences in company size and the scope of executive roles. The committee uses such data as reference material to assist it in gaining a general awareness of industry compensation standards and trends. The market data does not formulaically determine the committee’s compensation decisions for any particular executive officer. The committee does not target a particular percentile of the peer group with respect to total pay packages or any individual component of pay. For example, our CEO’s total compensation earned in 2010 (the latest year for which data was available) was at approximately the 50th percentile of 2010 CEO total compensation of our industry peers. The committee establishes two company-wide incentive award pools (cash and equity) within established guidelines to ensure that compensation is aligned with our financial and strategic results. All 2011 awards are paid out of these award pools. As part of the committee’s oversight of compensation, the committee annually approves two company-wide award pools: •  a cash bonus pool; and •  a deferred compensation pool, consisting ofBased upon company’s annual stock deferral awards and long-term equity awards. At various times during the course of the year, the committee examines the company’s progress on multiple financial measures, including PCBOI, net revenues, adjusted operating margin, assets under management and adjusted diluted earnings per share, as well as non-quantitative measures, such as the company’s progress toward achieving its strategic objectives. While each of these items is considered by the committee in determining the size of the two pools, the committee does not attempt to rank or assign relative weight to any factor but rather applies its judgment in considering them in their entirety. The committee annually sets parameters, used consistently for many years, to guide the end-of-year decision-making process regarding pool sizes. These parameters are expressed as a percentage of PCBOI. The committee uses a range of 34-48% of PCBOI, in the aggregate, in setting the company-wide incentive pools, though it maintains the flexibility to go outside either end of this range in circumstances that it deems exceptional. This range was determined based on historical data concerning the practices of our peer group as analyzed by Johnson Associates and based on data obtained from the McLagan and CaseyQuirk Performance Intelligence Study. Over the past five years, the aggregate incentive pools have averaged approximately 44% of PCBOI. Utilizing its judgment, and applying discretion based upon the company’s financial results and progress towardagainst long-term strategic objectives the committee set the two company-wide award pools for 2011, in aggregate, at approximately 42% of PCBOI, which is down from 44% in 2010.Consequently, the award pools remained relatively unchanged, on an average per-person basis, from 2010. The committee’s decision to maintain the award pools at substantially the same level as 2010 is due to the committee’s balancing of the company’s objectives to invest in key

Compensation is closely linked with the Company’s progress against key financial measures with bonus pools determined based on a range of PCBOI

		strategic growth initiatives, to attract and retain high-performing employees and to deliver appropriate returns to our shareholders. For more information regarding the company’s financial results and our achievement of strategic objectives for 2011, see the captions “2011 Financial Performance” and “2011 Progress Against Our Strategic Objectives” above. Based upon the above, the committee determines our named executive officers’ annual variable compensation, consisting of:
	Annual stock deferral award (time-based vesting)		•  anProvides a competitive annual cash bonus,incentive opportunity   •  annual stock deferral award, andAligns executive with shareholder interests   •  long-term equity award.Encourages retention by vesting in annual increments over four years   The committee also reviews each named executive		•Based upon company’s annual financial results and progress against long-term strategic objectives
	Long-term equity awards (performance-based and time-based vesting)		officer’s salary. Consistent with the compensation principles described above, the committee structures the majority of NEO pay as variable compensation.•Recognizes long-term potential for future contributions to company’slong-term strategic objectives   The committee reviews the•Aligns executive with shareholder interests •Encourages retention by vesting in annual increments over four years		•Based upon company’s annual financial performanceresults and progress against ourlong-term strategic objectives and each named executive officer’s specific goals and accomplishments in determining compensation. For more information regarding the goals and accomplishments of our named executive officers, see the caption “2011 Named Executive Officer Compensation” below.   The following chart shows the alignment of our NEO’s total annual compensation for the last five years with the year-over-year change in our•30% performance-based vesting tied to adjusted diluted EPS and adjusted operating income.margin •70% time-based vesting

Our Performance-Based Long-Term Equity Awards

Long-term equity awards are four-year awards which generally vest in 25% increments each year. The committee believes that long-term equity awards should align employee and shareholder interests and that a portion of such awards should be paid only upon achievement of targeted company financial results. Therefore, the executive’s ability to realize 30% of the long-term equity award is tied to the achievement each year of at least one of two financial measures:

adjusted operating margin of the company for the fiscal year, as reported in the company’s SEC filings, must exceed certain thresholds; or

adjusted diluted earnings per share of the company for the fiscal year, as reported in the company’s SEC filings, must exceed certain thresholds.

Full vesting of the performance-based long-term equity award occurs in the event either target financial measure is achieved. Partial vesting of the award occurs on a pro-rated basis based on straight-line interpolation between a minimum threshold and the target financial measure. The award will vest based upon the higher achieved financial measure for that year. In addition, dividend equivalents are deferred for such performance awards and will only be paid if and to the extent an award vests. The target financial measures and minimum thresholds for the performance-based portion of our long-term equity awards granted in February 2013 are illustrated below.

2013 Compensation Decision Process

The following flowchart depicts the committee’s compensation decision process and related judgments in determining executive officers’ compensation for 2013.

2013 Named Executive Officer Compensation

For 2013, our named executive officers are:

			For 2009, total compensation of our named executive officers rose due to an increase in the long-term equity award component. The committee approved this increase based on its determination that, in the wake of the significant acquisition of the retail asset management business of Morgan Stanley, our named executive officers should be further motivated to position the company for growth and to further align their interests with those of our shareholders. The following flowchart depicts the above-described process and the committee’s related judgments in determining the named executive officers’ compensation for 2011.

2011 Compensation Decision Process

2011 Named Executive Officer CompensationName		Title
Set forth below is a summaryMartin L. Flanagan		President and Chief Executive Officer
Loren M. Starr		Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer
G. Mark Armour		Senior Managing Director and Head of EMEA
Andrew T.S. Lo		Senior Managing Director and Head of Asia Pacific
Philip A. Taylor		Senior Managing Director and Head of the material goals and accomplishments for 2011 of each named executive officer which the committee took into consideration in determining each such officer’s compensation for 2011. In addition, the following graphs show for each officer the ratio of 2011 cash compensation (salary and annual cash bonus) to deferred compensation (annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award). The tables set forth the elements of compensation paid to each such officer in respect of 2011.Americas

Set forth below is a summary of the 2013 compensation for each named executive officer, as well as the 2013 material goals and accomplishments of each named executive officer that the committee considered in determining each such officer’s compensation for 2013. In addition, the following graphs show for each named executive officer the ratio of 2013 cash incentive compensation (annual cash bonus) to deferred incentive compensation (annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award). The tables set forth the elements of compensation paid to each such officer for 2013.

Note:  The graphs and tables below depict how the committee viewed its compensation decisions for our NEOs, but they differ substantially from the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) on page 41 required by SEC rules and are not a substitute for the information presented in the SCT. There are two principal differences between the SCT and the presentations below:

 

Approximately 65% of our CEO’s total annual compensation is deferred, compared to an average CEO-deferral rate of approximately 56% for our industry peers for 2010 (the latest year for which information was available). Likewise, approximately 61% of our other named executive officers’ total annual compensation is deferred, compared to an average other named executive officer-deferral rate of approximately 40% for our industry peers for 2010.

Note: The graphs and tables below depict how the committee viewed its compensation decisions for our NEOs, but they differ substantially from the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) on page 42 required by SEC rules and are not a substitute for the information presented in the SCT. There are two principal differences between the SCT and the presentation below:

•

The company grants both cash and equitydeferred incentive compensation after our earnings for a performancethe year have been announced. In both the presentationpresentations below and the SCT, cash incentive compensation granted in 20122014 for 20112013 performance is shown as 20112013 compensation. Our presentation below treats equity awardsdeferred incentive compensation similarly, so that equity awards granted in 20122014 are shown as 20112013 compensation. The SCT does not follow this treatment, however, and insteadtreatment. Instead the SCT reports the value of equity awards in the year in which they are granted, rather than the year in which they were earned. As a result, equity awards granted in 20122014 for 20112013 performance are shown in our presentation below as 20112013 compensation, but the SCT reports for 20112013 the value of equity awards granted in 20112013 in respect of 20102012 performance.

 

•

The SCT reports “all other compensation.“All Other Compensation.” These amounts are not part of the committee’s current compensation determinations and are not shown in the presentation below.

Martin L. Flanagan — President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Flanagan has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since August 2005. His achievements in 2013 in respect of the company’s strategic objectives set forth below include:

 

Martin L.

•

Achieve strong financial performance — Mr. Flanagan — Presidentled the company’s strong financial performance in 2013, which included a 27.7% increase in annual adjusted operating income, 39.7% annual adjusted operating margin (an increase of 4.0 percentage points over 2012), a 29.1% increase in annual adjusted diluted EPS, total net inflows of $34.4 billion and Chief Executive Officer $850 million return of capital to our shareholders.

 

•

Achieve strong investment performance — — Mr. Flanagan oversaw the company’s continued solidfocus on delivering investment management which resulted in veryexcellence to clients and further enhanced the firm’s strong investment performance. culture. Investment performance across the company remained strong throughout 2013. Delivering strong, long-term investment performance to clients contributed to strong organic growth throughout the year.

 

•

•  Deliver the company’s investment capabilitiesBe instrumental to meet client needsour clients’ success — Mr. Flanagan oversawcontinued to oversee the enhancementfirm’s efforts to further strengthen and deepen client relationships through superior client engagement. Under

his leadership, the firm made solid progress building world-class fixed income capabilities through the creation of a global fixed income capability, which contributed to record AUM levels in Bank Loans, Stable Value and Investment Grade portfolios. The firm further expanded its ETF franchise, which contributed to record AUM levels for its ETF portfolio. Additionally, the firm continued to anticipate client demand by expanding its global investment strategies through the introduction of new multi-asset capabilities and liquid alternative products that we believe will benefit clients and our global diversified platform of investment opportunities by focusing product offerings and pursuing targeted expansion in areas with strong investor demand. Further, Mr. Flanagan oversawbusiness over the company’s continued successful integration of the retail asset management business of Morgan Stanley, including the Van Kampen funds, which was largely completed in 2011.long term.

 

•

Harness the power of our global operating platform — Mr. Flanagan oversaw the successful implementation of major organizational changes which resulted in increased collaboration across regions, newly identified opportunities and greater leveraging of global support capabilities. •  Perpetuate a high-performance organization — Mr. Flanagan oversaw the company’s efforts to launch a number of new capabilities globally that support the future growth of the firm. The company launched more funds during the fourth quarter of 2013 than it did in any full calendar year over the past five years.

•

Perpetuate a high-performance organization — Mr. Flanagan successfully managed changes within the organization to drive increased collaboration across regions and more effectively leverage our investment capabilities globally. As part of efforts to further enhance employee engagement, he oversaw efforts to significantly reinvest in employee talent through focused internal development supportedadditional focus on performance leadership and succession planning. Invesco’s employee engagement scores continued to exceed benchmarks set by strategic external new hires.high-performing companies worldwide, as reflected in data from a third-party administered employee survey.

Invesco generally is near the median of our peer group in terms of market capitalization and annual revenues. Our CEO’s total compensation earned in 2012 was at approximately the 60^th percentile of 2012 CEO total disclosed compensation of our industry peer companies (the latest year for which data was available). When comparing performance on a variety of financial measures, Invesco generally ranges between the 50^th and 70^th percentiles. Further, our CEO’s total compensation is strongly aligned with shareholders, with approximately 69% of his total incentive compensation deferred into Invesco stock. Therefore, the committee believes that our Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation is well aligned with performance and our shareholder’s interests.

For 2013, the Committee determined that Mr. Flanagan should see an increase to total compensation of 20% in recognition of the strong 2013 operating results and Mr. Flanagan’s leadership in continuing to achieve the strategic objectives of the company. The changes to each component of Mr. Flanagan’s compensation are detailed in the table below.

2013 Total Compensation*				Change from Prior Year
$ 15,000,000				+20%
Base Salary		2013 Annual Cash Bonus		2013 Annual Stock Deferral Award		2013 Long-Term Equity Award
$ 790,000		$ 4,475,000		$ 1,845,000		$ 7,890,000
Year-Over-Year Change from 2012 (%)
0%		+33%		+23%		+15%
*Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long- term equity award (30% of which is performance based) earned in 2013. See note on p. 33 regarding differences from the SCT.

Loren M. Starr — Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Starr has been our Chief Financial Officer since October 2005. His achievements in 2013 include:

•

Generated expense savings and improved margins — Mr. Starr oversaw efforts to expand the company’s operating margin through the course of 2013 by implementing cost saving programs to more effectively deploy existing resources and by allocating capital to high growth areas.

2011 Total  Compensation*								Change from Prior Year
	$12,890,000								0%
Base Salary				2011 Annual Cash Bonus				2011 Annual Stock Deferral Award				2011 Long- Term Equity Award
$	790,000			$	3,750,000			$	1,500,000			$	6,850,000

•

Supported the continued investment in the business for future growth —Mr. Starr supported the continued growth of the business by leading the company in financing several important new product launches, with more than $250 million in seed capital. Mr. Starr also led the efforts to improve the firm’s liquidity in part through the issuance of $1 billion of long-term senior debt at favorable rates of interest and paying down the outstanding credit facility debt.

•

Oversaw financial aspects of acquisitions and divestitures —Mr. Starr led the finance team in supporting the acquisition of an interest in Religare Asset Management, one of the top 15 asset managers in the growing India market, as well as the divestiture of Atlantic Trust, a private wealth unit which was not core to the firm’s asset management business.

•

Improved leadership, people development and training —Mr. Starr continued to devote significant attention to people development in 2013 within the groups he manages, resulting in continued improvement in employees’ development, training and leadership skills. Employee survey results related to coordination, teamwork and empowerment exceeded high-performing company norms.

•

Focused on core financial systems —Mr. Starr initiated the upgrade of the company’s general accounting and financial systems to significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of our global financial processes.

2013 Total Compensation*				Change from Prior Year
$ 3,730,000				+9%
Base Salary		2013 Annual Cash Bonus		2013 Annual Stock Deferral Award		2013 Long-Term Equity Award
$ 450,000		$ 1,030,000		$ 450,000		$ 1,800,000
Year-Over-Year Change from 2012 (%)
0%		+20%		+22%		+3%
*Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long- term equity award (30% of which is performance based) earned in 2013. See note on p. 33 regarding differences from the SCT.

G. Mark Armour — Senior Managing Director and Head of EMEA

In early 2013, Mr. Armour assumed responsibility for Invesco’s EMEA business (which includes Europe, Middle East and Africa). His accomplishments in 2013 include:

•

Achieved strong investment performance —Mr. Armour further enhanced the robust investment culture in EMEA, which helped deliver strong investment performance to clients. As an example, the Invesco Perpetual investment team continued to build on its excellent long-term performance record. He oversaw the recruitment of additional investment talent, the establishment of a multi-asset team in the UK, and numerous fund launches, including the Global Targeted Returns fund in the UK market, which saw inflows of over $250 million in the first three months. Mr. Armour led the transition for the planned departure of a key investment professional announced in late 2013, while maintaining strong flows in the UK and across Europe.

•

Improved governance processes in light of changes in European regulations —Mr. Armour oversaw efforts to position the firm ahead of changes in the regulatory environment within the UK and Europe, in part by increasing the frequency of Invesco governing body meetings and creating greater acceptance of the role of control functions across the organization.

•

Revised the strategy for sales across continental Europe —Mr. Armour led the effort to further enhance our ability to serve clients across Europe. As a result, AUM for EMEA increased $34.6 billion to $171.9 billion, improved gross sales of $49.4 billion, and net sales of $8.6 billion, all significantly ahead of the prior year.

As discussed in last year’s Proxy Statement, Mr. Armour’s compensation in 2012 was reduced due to a narrowing of the scope of his responsibilities for that year associated with the transition of an investment center to another executive officer, Karen Dunn Kelley, and the consolidation of North America retail and institutional sales under Philip Taylor. Mr. Armour’s total compensation was therefore reduced from $4.7M in 2011 to $3.6M in 2012. Upon assuming the role as the head of Invesco’s EMEA business in early 2013, the scope of Mr. Armour’s responsibilities were greatly expanded. The committee determined that the scope of his role in 2013 warranted an increase in compensation to levels at least as high as 2011 compensation. In addition, the committee agreed to recognize his leadership of the EMEA region in 2013, including the achievements described above.

2013 Total Compensation*				Change from Prior Year**
$ 5,034,807				+38%
Base Salary		2013 Annual Cash Bonus		2013 Annual Stock Deferral Award		2013 Long-Term Equity Award
$ 469,790		$ 1,525,017		$ 690,000		$ 2,350,000
Year-Over-Year Change from 2012 (%)
7%		+74%		+20%		+34%
*Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long- term equity award (30% of which is performance based) earned in 2013. See note on p. 33 regarding differences from the SCT. **Changes in components involving cash compensation include the effect of foreign exchange rate differences.

Andrew T.S. Lo — Senior Managing Director and Head of Asia Pacific

Mr. Lo has been head of the firm’s Asia Pacific business since 2001. His accomplishments in 2013 include:

•

Achieved strong investment performance and brought the best of Invesco to clients —Mr. Lo oversaw the improvement of relative performance of Asia Pacific managed assets, for the one-, three-, and five-year periods. Investment performance in Invesco’s Greater China business and its joint venture in China (Invesco Great Wall) was particularly strong, contributing to a robust growth in AUM. Invesco Great Wall maintained its leadership position and finished the year as the largest active manager overall in Chinese equities among the country’s approximately 90 fund management companies. The joint venture was awarded the “Most Respected Fund Management Company” for 2013 byMoneyweek. Mr. Lo also oversaw the successful launch of new ETFs in Greater China.

•

Successfully integrated investment team in India — Mr. Lo led the acquisition of an interest in Religare Asset Management, expanding Invesco’s capabilities into the growing India market.

•

Strengthened sales and marketing in Japan, Australia and Korea —Mr. Lo further enhanced the organizational structure in Japan to place greater emphasis on client engagement, marketing and product management. These efforts, combined with the improving investment performance, helped drive strong gains in retail sales for the business. Mr. Lo hired a new head of the Australian team and combined the market’s retail and institutional sales teams under unified leadership, which then achieved an increase in institutional sales with new and existing clients. Mr. Lo oversaw the implementation of a new sales office in Seoul, South Korea to begin serving this rapidly growing asset management market in 2014.

2013 Total Compensation*				Change from Prior Year**
$ 4,417,372				+20%
Base Salary		2013 Annual Cash Bonus		2013 Annual Stock Deferral Award		2013 Long-Term Equity Award
$ 462,389		$ 1,324,983		$    530,000		$ 2,100,000
Year-Over-Year Change from 2012 (%)
0%		+29%		+20%		+20%
*Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award (30% of which is performance based) earned in 2013. See note on p. 33 regarding differences from the SCT. **Changes in components involving cash compensation include the effect of foreign exchange rate differences.

Philip Taylor — Senior Managing Director and Head of the Americas

Mr. Taylor has been head of the firm’s Americas business since 2012. His achievements in 2013 include:

•

Increased overall sales and distribution effectiveness — Mr. Taylor increased overall retail and institutional distribution effectiveness in the U.S., Invesco’s largest market, by further strengthening the sales culture and leadership, including improved objective setting and monitoring, enhanced talent management, and increased collaboration with marketing, product management, product development and investments. This effort, coupled with the strong investment performance of the U.S.-based investment teams, led to an increase in net flows of 18% over the prior year. Independent research showed continued high levels of Invesco brand awareness. Additionally, Mr. Taylor’s leadership resulted in employee survey scores that showed further improved engagement across the sales organization, including customer service orientation and leadership metrics.

•

Brought the best of Invesco to our clients around the world — Mr. Taylor directed continued growth of Invesco’s ETF franchise to record high asset levels. In the U.S., share of net flows increased to 7% of industry flows, a share that is higher than share of assets. Mr. Taylor also oversaw the expansion of Invesco PowerShares ETFs in Canada and Greater China.

•

Built on positive momentum in Canada — Mr. Taylor directed efforts to further strengthen the effectiveness of Canada’s investment leadership, culture and reputation in the Canadian marketplace. As a result, investment performance improved versus peers, net sales increased and Invesco Canada was nominated as Morningstar Advisors’ Choice Fund Company of the Year.

2013 Total Compensation*				Change from Prior Year**
$ 7,425,174				+9%
Base Salary		2013 Annual Cash Bonus		2013 Annual Stock Deferral Award		2013 Long-Term Equity Award
$ 616,453		$ 2,463,721		$ 1,045,000		$ 3,300,000
Year-Over-Year Change from 2012 (%)
-3%		+17%		+20%		+3%
*Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award (30% of which is performance based) earned in 2013. See note on p. 33 regarding differences from the SCT. **Changes in components involving cash compensation include the effect of foreign exchange rate differences.

Other Compensation Policies and Practices

Share Ownership Guidelines

 

*		Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award earned in 2011- see note on p. 32 regarding differences from the SCT.

		Loren M. Starr — Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer •  Generate capital planning efficiencies — Mr. Starr achieved significant improvements in capital planning that generated savings in 2011 as a result of effective tax planning activities, structured financings and acquisition-related savings. •  Improve management financial forecasting and reporting — Mr. Starr oversaw the complete integration of vital management forecasting and reporting functions and the facilitation of stronger relationships between senior management and key functional leaders — with the result of both efforts being more informed decision-making and cost savings by management. •  Improve leadership, people development and training — Mr. Starr devoted significant attention to people development in 2011, resulting in material improvement in employees’ development, training and leadership skills.

2011 Total  Compensation*								Change from Prior Year
	$3,550,000								0%
Base Salary				2011 Annual Cash Bonus				2011 Annual Stock Deferral Award				2011 Long- Term Equity Award
$	450,000			$	945,000			$	405,000			$	1,750,000

*		Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award earned in 2011- see note on p. 32 regarding differences from the SCT.

		G. Mark Armour — Senior Managing Director and Head of Institutional •  Maintain investment capabilities at high levels — Mr. Armour focused upon and achieved solid results regarding the company’s institutional investment capabilities. •  Create and execute client engagement plans for consultants and plan sponsors to ensure client success. Mr. Armour successfully continued best-in-class product ratings and best practice sales and service management for the benefit of institutional clients. •  Deliver the firm’s investment capabilities to institutional clients globally. Mr. Armour continued his successful leadership of a strategic initiative to match the firm’s investment capabilities to meet the particular needs of individual clients globally. •  Strengthen and further develop the firm’s alternative investment capabilities. Mr. Armour continued the development of our alternative investment capabilities, including real estate, direct private equity and multi-asset solutions.

2011 Total Compensation*								Change from Prior Year
	$4,743,670								-3.2%
Base Salary				2011 Annual Cash Bonus				2011 Annual Stock Deferral Award				2011 Long- Term Equity Award
$	443,670			$	1,350,000			$	600,000			$	2,350,000

*		Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award earned in 2011- see note on p. 32 regarding differences from the SCT.

		James I. Robertson – Senior Managing Director and Head of UK and Continental Europe •  Maintain high levels of performance of U.K. investment teams – Mr. Robertson oversaw another year of very strong performance from the Invesco Perpetual channel, with profits up materially over the previous record in 2010. •  Maintain sales leadership position in U.K. – Mr. Robertson successfully led sales efforts resulting in the company maintaining its position among the leaders in sales in the United Kingdom. •  Achieve strong momentum of continental Europe business – Mr. Robertson devoted significant efforts to the continued development of our continental European business and achieved strong positive momentum from the first year execution of a comprehensive multi-year plan.

2011 Total Compensation*								Change from Prior Year**
	$4,868,826								1.6%
Base Salary				2011Annual Cash Bonus				2011 Annual Stock Deferral Award				2011 Long- Term Equity Award
$	563,421			$	1,455,405			$	600,000			$	2,250,000

*		Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award earned in 2011 — see note on p. 32 regarding differences from the SCT.
**		All elements of compensation for 2011 remained unchanged from 2010. The slight increase in US dollars is the result of foreign exchange differences for salary and annual cash bonus between periods.

		Philip Taylor — Senior Managing Director and Head of North American Retail •  Perpetuate a high-performance organization by sustaining a talented pool of investment professionals working within a strong investment culture to generate strong investment performance over the long term — Mr. Taylor directed the continued strengthening of certain major investment teams in the U.S. and Canada, resulting in stronger leadership and management and deeper investment management talent. •  Strengthen and focus our suite of investment capabilities so as to offer our most compelling investment processes and strategies, reduce product overlap, ensure our products can be clearly distinguished and provide a foundation for future growth — Mr. Taylor successfully completed the consolidation and merger of numerous U.S. and Canadian fund products resulting in a strengthened and more focused set of investment choices for our investors. •  Deliver the firm’s investment capabilities to meet current and evolving client needs — Mr. Taylor directed the market introduction of innovative investment products to meet investor needs in managing market volatility, generating income and obtaining exposure to sectors and markets.
		•  Create and execute client engagement plans for our third party broker, financial planner and life insurance distribution clients and provide quality service within strong relationships to meet their needs and to grow our net sales — Mr. Taylor directed the successful achievement of impactful sales initiatives for our largest and highest potential clients resulting in the firm delivering stronger sales, market share and client approval ratings.

2011 Total  Compensation*								Change from Prior Year**
	$6,852,774								2.0%
Base Salary				2011Annual Cash Bonus				2011 Annual Stock Deferral Award				2011 Long- Term Equity Award
$	647,365			$	2,135,409			$	870,000			$	3,200,000

*		Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award earned in 2011 — see note on p. 32 regarding differences from the SCT.
**		All elements of compensation for 2011 remained unchanged from 2010. The slight increase in US dollars is the result of foreign exchange differences for salary and annual cash bonus between periods.

Components of Executive		The following table describes each component of executive compensation, as well as its purpose and key measures.
	Compensation and Their Purpose				Compensation Component		Purpose		Key Measures
			Fixed		Base salary		•    Competitive fixed pay		•    Experience, duties and scope of responsibility •    Internal and external market factors •    Reviewed annually
			Variable		Annual cash bonus		•    Competitive annual incentive opportunity		•    Based upon company’s annual financial results and progress against long-term strategic objectives
			Variable		Annual stock deferral award		•    Competitive annual incentive opportunity •    Aligns executive with shareholder interests •    Encourages retention by vesting over four years		•    Based upon company’s annual financial results and progress against long-term strategic objectives
		Variable		Long-term equity award		•    Recognizes long-term potential for future contributions to company’s strategic objectives •    Aligns executive with shareholder interests •    Encourages retention by vesting over four years		•    Based upon company’s annual financial results and progress against long-term strategic objectives

About Our Equity Awards		The vesting of thirty percent (30%) of the 2011 long-term equity awards granted to our named executive officers is conditioned upon achievement of certain financial measures. In order to further emphasize the importance of long-term performance, and in response to shareholder concerns, for 2011 the committee implemented a modified long-term equity award structure for our executive officers, including our named executive officers. The committee believes that long-term equity awards should align employee and shareholder interests and that a portion of such awards should be paid only upon achievement of targeted company financial results. Therefore, the executive’s ability to realize 30% of the long-term equity award is tied to the achievement each year of at least one of two performance measures: •    adjusted operating margin of the company for the fiscal year, as set forth in the company’s SEC reports, must exceed certain thresholds; or •    adjusted diluted earnings per share of the company for the fiscal year, as set forth in the SEC reports, must exceed certain thresholds.

Stock Ownership Policy - Ownership level required

Chief executive officer 250,000 shares

All other executive officers 100,000 shares

		Long-term equity awards are four-year awards which vest 25% each year. In the event either targeted financial measure is achieved at or above a vesting threshold for a particular year, the portion of the long-term equity award subject to targeted financial measures will vest proportionately between 0% and 100% based upon the higher achieved level for that year. In addition, dividend equivalents will be deferred for such performance awards and will only be paid if and to the extent an award vests. The targeted financial measures vesting thresholds for the 2011 long-term equity awards granted in February 2012 are illustrated below. Vests proportionately between 0% and 100% based on the higher achievement level for that year
		Our executive officers’ 2011 equity awards subject to achievement of target financial results are also subject to a new “clawback” policy. The committee has enhanced our compensation practices by approving new forfeiture or “clawback” provisions for all equity awards which are subject to achievement of target financial results as described above made in respect of 2011 to our executive officers, including our named executive officers. The provision provides that any shares received (whether vested or unvested), any dividends or other earnings thereon, and the proceeds from any sale of such shares are subject to recovery by the company in the event that: •    the company issues a restatement of financial results to correct a material error; and
		•    the committee determines, in good faith, that fraud or willful misconduct on the part of the employee was a significant contributing factor to the need to issue such restatement; and •    some or all of the shares granted or received prior to such restatement would not have been granted or received, as determined by the committee in its sole discretion, based upon the restated financial results. All equity awards made to our executive officers are subject to our Executive Officer
		Stock Ownership Policy.The policy requires executive officers to achieve a certain ownership level within three years. Until such level is
		achieved, each executive officer is required to retain 100% of the shares received from our share incentive plans. All of our executive officers have achieved their respective ownership level requirements.

Role of the Compensation Committee		The committee has, among other duties, responsibility for determining the components and amounts of compensation paid to our executive officers, including our named executive officers. The committee’s responsibilities include: •    reviewing and making recommendations to the Board about the company’s overall compensation philosophy; •    approving company-wide annual compensation pools; •    evaluating the performance of, and setting the compensation for, the chief executive officer; •    reviewing and overseeing management’s annual process for evaluating the performance of, and approving the compensation for, all other executive officers, including the other named executive officers; and •    overseeing the administration of the company’s compensation programs. The committee makes its compensation determinations in its discretion, without formulaically tying its determinations to specific targets, formulas or weightings. The achievement of any particular goal or objective, financial or individual, does not automatically result in any particular level of compensation. The committee believes that a flexible approach in aligning management and shareholder interests, which takes into account qualitative judgments tied to the achievement of financial results and progress against our long-term strategy objectives, is more effective than purely formulaic criteria.
Use of Compensation Consultants		The committee’s charter gives it the authority to retain consultants and other advisors to assist it in performing its duties. The committee has engaged Johnson Associates, an independent consulting firm, to advise it on director and executive compensation matters. Johnson Associates: •    attends certain meetings of the committee and periodically meets with the committee without members of management present; •    assists the committee throughout the year in its analysis and evaluation of our overall executive compensation programs; •    assists the committee in its review of compensation paid to our directors and executive officers, including our named executive officers;
		•    provides the committee with certain market data and analysis that comparesStock Ownership Policy – Ownership level required
			Chief Executive Officer		250,000 shares
			All other executive compensation paid by the company with that paid by other firms in the financial services industry and certain investment management firms which we consider generally comparable to us; •    estimates pay levels of comparable positions at our peer group (using data provided by Invesco regarding job titles and responsibilities of our executive officers); •    utilizes data inputs regarding market conditions, market impressions and compensation trends; and •    applies its qualitative judgment to the data from these disparate sources and provides market consensus information to the committee, accompanied by oral commentary. officers		100,000 shares

		The committee uses such data as reference material to assist it in gaining a general awareness of industry compensation standards and trends. The market data, including performance and pay practices of the peer group, do not directly affect the committee’s compensation determinations for our executive officers, including our named executive officers. Although we seek to offer to our executive officers a level of total compensation that is competitive, we do not target a particular percentile of market or the peer group with respect to total pay packages or any individual components thereof. The committee’s consideration of the market compensation levels and performance constitutes only one of many factors reviewed, and such market or peer group data is considered generally and not as a substitute for the committee’s independent judgment in making compensation decisions regarding our executive officers. Under the terms of its engagement with the committee, Johnson Associates does not provide any other services to the company unless the committee has approved such services. No such other services were provided in 2011. The company uses other compensation and benefits consultants to provide market practice data, actuarial services and/or advice relating to broad management employee programs in which named executive officers may participate.
Role of Executive Officers in Determining Executive Compensation		Our chief executive officer meets with the non-executive directors (including the members of the committee) throughout the year to discuss executive performance and compensation matters, including proposals relative to compensation for individual executive officers (other than the chief executive officer). Our chief executive officer and chief administrative officer work with the committee to implement our compensation philosophy. They also provide to the committee information regarding financial and investment performance of the company as well as our progress toward our strategic objectives. Our chief financial officer assists as needed in explaining specific aspects of the company’s financial performance and may, from time to time, provide an explanation of the appropriate accounting treatment relating to certain awards.
Award Maximums for Named Executive Officers		In determining compensation for the named executive officers, the committee considers the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation greater than $1 million paid per fiscal year to each of the corporation’s “covered employees” (generally, the chief executive officer and the next three most highly compensated executive officers, other than the chief financial officer, as of the end of any fiscal year). However, compensation which qualifies as “performance-based” is excluded from the $1 million per executive officer limit if, among other requirements, the compensation is payable only upon attainment of pre-established, objective performance goals under a plan approved by the company’s shareholders.
		As part of our compensation program for executive officers, the company maintains the Executive Incentive Bonus Plan (“EIBP”). The EIBP provides for annual performance-based awards to eligible employees. For each executive officer, the committee determines on an annual basis an award maximum under the EIBP. Award maximums are expressed as a percentage of PCBOI — an objectively determined performance criteria that is intended to qualify for the performance-based exemption to the $1 million deduction limit under Section 162(m). Award maximums pertain to the cumulative value of an executive officer’s annual variable compensation —

Clawback Policy

Our executive officers’ long-term equity awards subject to achievement of target financial results are also subject to a “clawback” policy. All equity awards that are subject to achievement of target financial results in respect of our executive officers, including our named executive officers, are also subject to forfeiture or “clawback” provisions. The provisions provide that any shares received (whether vested or unvested), any dividends or other earnings thereon, and the proceeds from any sale of such shares, are subject to recovery by the company in the event that:

the company issues a restatement of financial results to correct a material error;

the committee determines, in good faith, that fraud or willful misconduct on the part of the employee was a significant contributing factor to the need to issue such restatement; and

some or all of the shares granted or received prior to such restatement would not have been granted or received, as determined by the committee in its sole discretion, based upon the restated financial results.

Benefits and Perquisites

As a general practice, the company provides no material benefits and limited perquisites to executive officers that it does not provide to other employees. All executive officers are entitled to receive medical, life and disability insurance coverage and other corporate benefits available to most of the company’s employees. Executive officers are also eligible to participate in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan on similar terms to the company’s other employees. In addition, all of the executive officers may participate in the 401(k) Plan or similar plans in the executive officer’s home country.

The company provides certain limited perquisites to its executive officers which it believes aid the executives in their execution of company business. For example, personal use of company aircraft may be provided to enable named executive officers to devote additional and efficient time to company business when traveling. The committee believes the value of perquisites and other benefits are reasonable in amount and consistent with its overall compensation plan. For additional information on perquisites and other benefits, see the “Summary Compensation Table” in this Proxy Statement.

Award Maximums for Named Executive Officers

In determining compensation for the named executive officers, the committee considers the potential impact of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation greater than $1 million paid per fiscal year to each of the corporation’s “covered employees” (generally, the Chief Executive Officer and the next three most highly compensated executive officers as of the end of any fiscal year). However, compensation which

qualifies as “performance-based” is excluded from the $1 million per executive officer limit if, among other requirements, the compensation is payable only upon attainment of pre-established, objective performance goals under a plan approved by the company’s shareholders.

As part of our compensation program for executive officers, the company maintains the Executive Incentive Bonus Plan (“Bonus Plan”). The Bonus Plan provides for annual performance-based awards to eligible employees. For each executive officer, the committee determines on an annual basis an award maximum under the Bonus Plan. Award maximums are expressed as a percentage of PCBOI – an objectively determined performance criteria that is intended to qualify for the performance-based exemption to the $1 million deduction limit under Section 162(m). Award maximums pertain to the cumulative value of an executive officer’s annual variable compensation – consisting of the annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award. In the event the committee determines to grant additional compensation that is not performance-based compensation to an executive subject to the provisions of Section 162(m), the additional compensation will be subject to the $1 million deduction limitation.

In February 2013, the committee established three levels of award maximums in respect of our named executive officers – one each for the Chief Executive Officer, Senior Managing Directors of business components, and Senior Managing Directors of staff functions. The three levels of award maximums were established after consideration of:

prior-year compensation levels in light of the company’s 2012 PCBOI;

projected maximum award levels based on the company’s estimated 2013 PCBOI;

market data for industry comparative compensation levels; and

comparisons for job roles and levels of responsibility.

Employment Agreements, Post-employment Compensation and Change-in-Control Arrangements

Employment Agreements

Chief Executive Officer — Our Chief Executive Officer has an employment agreement with the company that was amended and restated as of January 1, 2011. Under the amended and restated employment agreement, Mr. Flanagan continues to be employed as President and Chief Executive Officer of the company. The agreement terminates upon the earlier of December 31, 2025 (the year in which Mr. Flanagan reaches age 65) or the occurrence of certain events, including death, disability, termination by the company for “cause” or termination by Mr. Flanagan for “good reason.”

The terms of Mr. Flanagan’s amended employment agreement provide:

an annual base salary of $790,000;

the opportunity to receive an annual cash bonus award based on the achievement of performance criteria;

the opportunity to receive share awards based on the achievement of performance criteria;

eligibility to participate in incentive, savings and retirement plans, deferred compensation programs, benefit plans, fringe benefits and perquisites, and paid vacation, all as provided generally to otherU.S.-based senior executives of the company;

post-employment compensation of one times the sum of base, bonus and share awards, subject to certain agreed minimums described below; and

 

•		In February 2011, the committee established three levels of award maximums in respect of our named executive officers — one each for the chief executive officer, senior managing directors of business components, and senior managing directors of staff functions. The three levels of award maximums were established after consideration of: •    prior-year compensation levels in light of the company’s 2010 PCBOI; •    projected maximum award levels based on the company’s estimated 2011 PCBOI; •    market data for industry comparative compensation levels; and •    comparisons for job roles and levels of responsibility.
Employment Agreements, Post-employment Compensation and Change-in- Control Arrangements		Employment Agreement of our Chief Executive Officer — Our chief executive officer has an employment agreement with the company that was amended and restated as of January 1, 2011. Under the amended and restated employment agreement, Mr. Flanagan continues to be employed as president and chief executive officer of the company. The agreement terminates upon the earlier of December 31, 2025 (the year in which Mr. Flanagan reaches age 65) or the occurrence of certain events, including death, disability, termination by the company for “cause” or termination by Mr. Flanagan for “good reason.” The terms of Mr. Flanagan’s amended employment agreement provide: •    an annual base salary of $790,000; •    the opportunity to receive an annual cash bonus award based on the achievement of performance criteria; •    the opportunity to receive share awards based on the achievement of performance criteria; •    eligibility to participate in incentive, savings and retirement plans, deferred compensation programs, benefit plans, fringe benefits and perquisites, and paid vacation, all as provided generally to other U.S.-based senior executives of the company; •    post-employment compensation of one times the sum of base, bonus and share awards, subject to certain agreed minimums described below; and •    certain stipulations regarding termination of employment that are described below under the captionin“Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control for 2011.”2013”
		Post-employment Compensation - Chief Executive Officer — Pursuant to Mr. Flanagan’s amended and restated employment agreement, in the event of his termination without “cause” or resignation for “good reason” he is entitled to receive the following payments and benefits (provided that he has not breached certain restrictive covenants): •    his then-effective base salary through the date of termination; •    a prorated portion of the greater of $4,750,000 or his most recent annual cash bonus; •    immediate vesting and exercisability of all outstanding share-based awards; •    any compensation previously deferred (unless a later payout date is stipulated in his deferral arrangements); below.

		•    a cash severance payment generally equal to the sum of (i) his base salary, (ii) the greater of $4,750,000 or his most recent annual cash bonus, and (iii) his most recently made annual equity grant (unless the value thereof is less than 50% of the previously-made grant, in which case the value of the previously-made grant will be used); •    continuation of medical benefits for him, his spouse and his covered dependents for a period of up to 36 months following termination; •    any accrued vacation; and •    any other vested amounts or benefits under any other plan or program. Post-employment Compensation Chief Executive Officer — Pursuant to Mr. Flanagan’s amended and restated employment agreement, in the event of his termination without “cause” or resignation for “good reason” he is entitled to receive the following payments and benefits (provided that he has not breached certain restrictive covenants): his then-effective base salary through the date of termination; a prorated portion of the greater of $4,750,000 or his most recent annual cash bonus; immediate vesting and exercisability of all outstanding share-based awards; any compensation previously deferred under a deferred compensation plan (unless a later payout date is stipulated in his deferral arrangements); a cash severance payment generally equal to the sum of (i) his base salary, (ii) the greater of $4,750,000 or his most recent annual cash bonus, and (iii) his most recently made annual equity grant (unless the value thereof is less than 50% of the previously-made grant, in which case the value of the previously-made grant will be used); continuation of medical benefits for him, his spouse and his covered dependents for a period of up to 36 months following termination; any accrued vacation; and any other vested amounts or benefits under any other plan or program. Other Named Executive Officers — Our other named executive officers are parties to employment arrangements that create salary continuation periods of six or twelve months in the event of involuntary termination of service without cause. (See the section below entitledcause.(See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control for 2011.”2013”below.) Change-In-Control Arrangements Change-in-Control Arrangements — Generally, all participants who hold equity awards, including our named executive officers, are eligible, under certain circumstances, for accelerated vesting in the event of a change of control of the company that is followed by involuntary termination of employment other than for cause or by voluntary termination for “good reason.”

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report.

Respectfully submitted by the Compensation Committee

Sir John Banham (Chairman)

Rex D. Adams

C. Robert Henrikson⁽¹⁾

Ben F. Johnson, III

Denis Kessler

Edward P. Lawrence

Phoebe A. Wood

(1)

Mr. Henrikson was recently elected as a member of the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and was not a memberAnalysis be included in this Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference into our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Respectfully submitted by the Compensation Committee: Sir John Banham (Chairman) Rex D. Adams C. Robert Henrikson Ben F. Johnson, III Denis Kessler Edward P. Lawrence G. Richard Wagoner, Jr. Phoebe A. Wood Summary Compensation Table for 2013 The following table sets forth information about compensation earned by our named executive officers during 2011, 2012 and 2013 in accordance with SEC rules. The information presented below may be different from compensation information presented in this Proxy Statement under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” as such section describes compensation decisions made in respect of the committee duringindicated fiscal year, regardless of when such compensation was actually paid or granted. For an explanation of the period covered by this report.

Summary Compensation Table for 2011

The following table sets forth information about compensation earned by our named executive officers during 2009, 2010 and 2011 in accordance with SEC rules. The information presented below may be different from compensation information presented in this Proxy Statement under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” as such section describes compensation decisions made in respect of the indicated fiscal year, regardless of when such compensation was actually paid or granted. For an explanation of the principal differences between the presentation in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the table below, please see the note on page 32.

Name and Principal Position		Year				Salary ($) (1)				Share Awards ($) (2)				Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (3)				All Other Compensation ($) (4)				Total ($)
Martin L. Flanagan			2011				790,000				8,349,978				3,750,000				530,480				13,420,458
President and Chief Executive Officer			2010				790,000				6,508,494				3,750,000				459,908				11,508,402
			2009				790,000				3,954,997				2,558,000				461,224				7,764,211
Loren M. Starr			2011				450,000				2,154,984				945,000				117,622				3,667,606
Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer			2010				450,000				1,685,992				945,000				101,180				3,182,172
			2009				450,000				1,129,993				650,000				93,384				2,323,377
G. Mark Armour			2011				443,670				3,099,993				1,350,000				238,918				5,132,581
Senior Managing Director and Head of Invesco Institutional			2010				400,000				2,919,988				1,400,000				292,010				5,011,998
			2009				400,000				2,799,996				1,085,000				266,435				4,551,431
James I. Robertson			2011				563,421				2,849,979				1,455,405				236,312				5,105,117
Senior Managing Director and Head of UK and Continental Europe			2010				540,280				2,759,543				1,400,000				579,663				5,279,486
			2009				549,237				3,599,993				1,010,620				312,896				5,472,746
Philip A. Taylor			2011				647,365				4,069,964				2,135,409				257,391				7,110,129
Senior Managing Director and Head of North American Retail			2010				616,374				4,169,958				2,030,000				359,404				7,175,737
			2009				562,863				1,699,984				1,444,138				320,035				4,027,019

principal differences between the presentation in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the table below, please see the note on page 33.

Name and Principal Position		Year		Salary ($) (1)		Share Awards ($) (2)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (3)		All Other Compensation ($) (4)		Total ($)
Martin L. Flanagan		2013		790,000		8,349,960		4,475,000		766,802		14,381,762
President and Chief Executive Officer		2012		790,000		8,349,969		3,375,000		728,966		13,243,935
		2011		790,000		8,349,978		3,750,000		530,480		13,420,458
Loren M. Starr		2013		450,000		2,118,525		1,030,000		177,329		3,775,854
Senior Managing Director and		2012		450,000		2,154,972		859,950		149,516		3,614,438
Chief Financial Officer		2011		450,000		2,154,984		945,000		117,622		3,667,606
G. Mark Armour		2013		469,790		2,324,969		1,525,017		346,359		4,666,135
Senior Managing Director and		2012		440,969		2,849,983		874,691		223,981		4,389,624
Head of EMEA		2011		443,670		3,099,993		1,350,000		238,918		5,132,581
Andrew T.S. Lo (5)		2013		462,389		2,191,742		1,324,983		219,311		4,198,425
Senior Managing Director and		2012		—		—		—		—		—
Head of Invesco Asia Pacific		2011		—		—		—		—		—
Philip A. Taylor		2013		616,453		4,069,962		2,463,721		307,706		7,457,842
Senior Managing Director and		2012		638,434		4,069,953		2,105,860		311,576		7,125,823
Head of Americas		2011		647,365		4,069,964		2,135,409		257,391		7,110,129

 

(1)

For each of the named executive officers, includes salary that was eligible for deferral, at the election of the named executive officer, under our 401(k) plan or similar plan in the named executive officer’s country. For Messrs. Armour, Lo and Taylor, base salary is converted to U.S. dollars using an average annual exchange rate.

(2)

For share awards granted in 2013, includes time-based and performance-based equity awards that generally vest in four equal annual installments on each anniversary of the date of grant. The value of performance-based awards is based on the grant date value and reflects the probable outcome of such conditions and represents the highest level of achievement. See, “Grants of Plan-Based Share Awards for 2013” for information about the number of shares underlying each of the time-based and performance-based equity awards.

Grant date fair values were calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation.” The grant date fair value was calculated by multiplying the number of shares granted by the closing price of the company’s common shares on the date of grant.

The amounts disclosed do not reflect the value actually realized by the named executive officers. For additional information, please see Note 11 — “Share-Based Compensation” to the financial statements in our Annual Report.

(3)

Reflects annual cash bonus award earned for fiscal year by the named executive officers under the Executive Incentive Bonus Plan and paid in February of the following year. For 2013, for Messrs. Armour, Lo and Taylor, annual cash bonus awards are converted to U.S. dollars using an average annual exchange rate.

(4)	The following table reflects the items that are included in the All Other Compensation column for 2013.

(5)	Mr. Lo was not an NEO in 2012 or 2011.

All Other Compensation Table for 2013

Name		Dividends Paid on Unvested Stock Awards ($) (1)		Insurance Premiums ($)		Company Contributions to Retirement and 401(k) Plans ($) (2)		Tax Consultation ($) (3)		Perquisites ($) (4)		Total All Other Compensation ($)
Martin L. Flanagan		585,288		4,680		22,050		—		154,784		766,802
Loren M. Starr		150,881		4,398		22,050		—		—		177,329
G. Mark Armour		212,534		2,043		21,580		110,202		—		346,359
Andrew T.S. Lo		159,284		6,604		53,423		—		—		219,311
Philip A. Taylor		285,329		2,003		13,043		7,331		—		307,706

(1)	Includes dividends and dividend equivalents paid at the same rate as on our other shares on (i) unvested time-based awards, and (ii) performance-based awards to the extent that the award vested.

(2)	Amounts of matching contributions paid by the company to our retirement plans are calculated on the same basis for all plan participants, including the named executive officers.

(3)	With respect to Mr. Armour, includes fees paid in 2013 for services provided in calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013.

(4)	Perquisites include the following:

With respect to Mr. Flanagan, includes $151,207 for his personal use of company-provided aircraft. With respect to the company-provided aircraft, the company pays direct operating expenses, monthly lease payments and management fees, as well as fees of a third-party supplier. We calculate the aggregate incremental cost to the company for personal use based on the average variable costs of operating the aircraft. Variable costs include fuel, repairs, travel expenses for the flight crews, and other miscellaneous expenses. This methodology excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as depreciation, maintenance, taxes and insurance.

Mr. Flanagan’s total also includes certain amounts for technology support and amounts paid by the company for the officer’s and his spouse’s incidentals and recreational activities in conjunction with a company-sponsored off-site business meeting.

Grants of Plan-Based Share Awards for 2013

The Compensation Committee granted share awards to each of the named executive officers includes salary that was eligibleduring 2013. Share awards are subject to transfer restrictions and subject to forfeiture prior to vesting upon a recipient’s termination of employment for deferral, atany reason other than death, disability, involuntary termination other than for cause or unsatisfactory performance, or (in the electioncase of Mr. Flanagan only) voluntary termination for “good reason.” All share awards immediately become vested upon the recipient’s termination of employment during the 24-month period following a change in control (i) by the company other than for cause or disability, or (ii) by the recipient for good reason.

The following table presents information concerning plan-based awards granted to each of the named executive officer, under our 401(k) planofficers during 2013.

								Estimated Future Payout Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (1)				All Other Share Awards (#) (2)		Closing Market Price on Date of Grant ($/Share)		Grant Date Fair Value of Share Awards ($) (3)
Name		Grant Date		Committee Action Date		Vesting		Threshold (#)		Maximum (#)
Martin L. Flanagan		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year ratable		-		76,707		-		26.79			2,054,980
		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year ratable		-		-		234,975		26.79			6,294,980
Loren M. Starr		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year ratable		-		19,596		-		26.79			524,976
		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year ratable		-		-		59,483		26.79			1,593,549
G. Mark Armour		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year ratable		-		19,596		-		26.79			524,976
		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year ratable		-		-		67,189		26.79			1,799,993
Andrew T.S. Lo		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year ratable		-		19,596		-		26.79			524,976
		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year ratable		-		-		62,216		26.79			1,666,766
Philip A. Taylor		02/28/13		02/14/13		3-year ratable		-		26,875		-		26.79			719,981
		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year cliff		-		8,958		-		26.79			239,984
		02/28/13		02/14/13		3-year ratable		-		-		87,066		26.79			2,332,498
		02/28/13		02/14/13		4-year cliff		-		-		29,022		26.79			777,499

(1)

Performance-based Equity Awards. Performance-based equity awards were granted under the 2011 Global Equity Incentive Plan. For each of the named executive officers other than Mr. Taylor, performance-based equity awards are four-year awards that vest 25% each year. With respect to Mr. Taylor, performance-based equity awards are comprised of a 3-year award that vests ratably and a 4-year award that vests 100% on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

Performance-based equity awards are tied to the achievement of specified levels of adjusted operating margin or similar planadjusted diluted earnings per share. Full vesting of the performance-based long-term equity award occurs in the named executive officer’s country. For Messrs. Armour, Robertson and Taylor, base salaryevent that either target financial measure is converted to U.S. dollars using an average annual exchange rate.

(2)	For stock awards granted in 2011, reflects time-based awards that generally vest in four equal annual installments on each anniversaryachieved. Partial vesting of the date of grant.

Grant date fair values were calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 “Compensation — Stock Compensation.” The grant date fair value was calculated by multiplying the number of shares granted by the closing price of the company’s common shares on the date of grant.

The amounts disclosed do not reflect the value actually realized by the named executive officers. For additional information, please see Note 12 — “Share-Based Compensation” to the financial statements in our Annual Report.

(3)

Reflects annual cash bonus award earnedoccurs on a pro-rated basis based on straight-line interpolation between a minimum threshold and the target financial measure. The award will vest based upon the higher achieved financial measure for fiscal year by the named executive officers under the Executive Incentive Bonus Plan and paid in February of the followingthat year.

(4)	The following table reflects the items that are included in the All Other Compensation column for 2011.

All Other Compensation Table for 2011

Name		Dividends Paid on Unvested Stock Awards ($) (1)				Insurance Premiums ($)				Company Contributions to Retirement and 401(k) Plans ($) (2)				Tax Gross Ups ($) (3)				Tax Consultation ($)				Perquisites ($) (4)				Total All Other Compensation ($)
Martin L. Flanagan			349,783				3,966				21,075				—				—				155,656				530,480
Loren M. Starr			92,869				3,678				21,075				—				—				—				117,622
G. Mark Armour			177,269				7,203				6,375				43,671				4,400				—				238,918
James I. Robertson			182,196				2,877				32,211				—				19,028				—				236,312
Philip A. Taylor			176,667				4,857				13,500				—				8,312				54,055				257,391

(1)	Dividends and dividend Dividend equivalents are deferred for such performance-based equity awards and will only be paid on unvested awards at the same rate as on our other shares.

(2)	Amounts of matching contributions paid byshares if and to the company to our retirement plans are calculated onextent an award vests. The target financial measures and minimum thresholds for the same basis for all plan participants, including the named executive officers.

(3)	With respect to Mr. Armour, represents gross-up on costs in connection with corporate housing payments and travel costs for Mr. Armour’s spouse in connection with Mr. Armour’s relocation.

(4)	Perquisites include the following:

With respect to Mr. Flanagan, includes $153,195 for his personal use of company-provided aircraft. The company pays certain hourly, monthly and annual fees for its use of a fractionally-owned airplane. The company also leases an airplane for which it pays direct operating expenses, and monthly lease payments and management fees. We calculate the aggregate incremental cost to the company for personal use based on the average variable costs of operating the airplanes. Variable costs include fuel, repairs, travel expenses for the flight crews, and other miscellaneous expenses. This methodology excludes fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as depreciation, maintenance, taxes and insurance. Mr. Flanagan’s total also includes certain amounts for technology support.

Fees paid by the company for the officer’s and his family’s and/or spouse’s recreational activities in conjunction with a company-sponsored off-site business meeting.

With respect to Mr. Taylor, includes (i) $47,034 for Mr. Taylor’s corporate housing; and (ii) work-related parking costs.

Grants of Plan-Based Share Awards for 2011

The committee granted share awards to each of the named executive officers during 2011. Share awards are subject to time-based vesting according to the terms of the applicable award agreement. Share awards are subject to transfer restrictions and subject to forfeiture prior to vesting upon a recipient’s termination of employment for any reason other than death, disability, involuntary termination without cause, or (in the case of Mr. Flanagan only) voluntary termination for “good reason.” Subject to satisfaction of a holding period requirement, certain share awards continue to vest upon a recipient’s termination of employment in the event of retirement. All share awards immediately become vested upon the recipient’s termination of employment during the 24-month period following a change in control (i) by the company other than for cause or disability, or (ii) by the recipient for good reason.

The following table presents information concerning plan-based awards granted to each of the named executive officers during 2011:

Name		Grant Date				Vesting (1)		All Other Share Awards (#)				Closing Market Price on Date of Grant ($/Share)				Grant Date Fair Value of Share Awards ($) (2)
Martin L. Flanagan			02/28/2011			4-year ratable			311,102				26.84				8,349,978
Loren M. Starr			02/28/2011			4-year ratable			80,290				26.84				2,154,984
G. Mark Armour			02/28/2011			4-year ratable			115,499				26.84				3,099,993
James I. Robertson			02/28/2011			4-year ratable			106,184				26.84				2,849,979
Philip A. Taylor			02/28/2011			3-year ratable			113,729				26.84				3,052,486
Philip A. Taylor			02/28/2011			4-year cliff			37,909				26.84				1,017,478

(1)

The 4-year ratable awards vest in four equal annual installments on each anniversary of the date of grant, and the 3-year ratable award generally vests in three equal annual installments on each anniversary of the date of grant. The 4-year cliff award vests on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant.

(2)

The grant date fair value is the total amount that the company will recognize as expense under applicable accounting requirements if the share awards fully vest. This amount is included in our Summary Compensation Table each year. Grant date fair values were calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” The grant date fair value is calculated by multiplying the number of shares granted by the closing priceperformance-based portion of our common shares on the day the award was granted.long-term equity awards are illustrated below.         Adjusted Diluted EPS    Vesting          Adjusted Operating Margin    Vesting   Equal to or greater than $1.10      100%                  or                Equal to or greater than 25.5%      100%    Less than $0.75      0%         Less than 22%      0%    (2) Time-based Equity Awards.Time-based equity awards were granted under the 2011 Global Equity Incentive Plan. For each of the named executive officers other than Mr. Taylor, time-based equity awards are four-year awards that vest 25% each year. With respect to Mr. Taylor, time-based equity awards are comprised of a 3-year award that vests ratably and a 4-year award that vests 100% on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant. Dividends and dividend equivalents are paid on unvested awards at the same time and rate as on our shares. Outstanding Share Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2011 (3) The grant date fair value is the total amount that the company will recognize as expense under applicable accounting requirements if the share awards fully vest. This amount is included in our Summary Compensation Table each year. Grant date fair values were calculated in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” The grant date fair value is calculated by multiplying the number of shares granted by the closing price of our common shares on the day the award was granted. With respect to the performance-based equity awards, the grant date fair value also represents the probable outcome of such performance conditions and represents the highest level of achievement. Outstanding Share Awards at Fiscal Year-End for 2013 The following table provides information as of December 31, 2011 about the outstanding share awards held by our named executive officers:        Option Awards     Share Awards              Date of     Number of Securities Underlying Options (#)       Option Exercise Price     Option Expiration     Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not     Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested     Equity Incentive Plan Awards that have not vested     Equity Incentive Plan Awards that have not vested   Name         Grant     Exercisable     Unexercisable     ($)(1)     Date     Vested (#)     ($)     (#)     ($)   Martin L. Flanagan     (2)        02/27/09        —        —        —        —        173,009        3,475,751        —        —          (3)        02/26/10        —        —        —        —        249,050        5,003,415        —        —          (4)        02/28/11        —        —        —        —        311,102        6,250,039        —        —    Loren M. Starr     (2)        02/27/09        —        —        —        —        49,431        993,069        —        —          (3)        02/26/10        —        —        —        —        21,505        432,035        —        —          (4)        02/28/11        —        —        —        —        80,290        1,613,026        —        —    G. Mark Armour     (2)        02/27/09        —        —        —        —        122,485        2,490,724        —        —          (3)        02/26/10        —        —        —        —        111,735        2,244,756        —        —          (4)        02/28/11        —        —        —        —        115,499        2,320,375        —        —    James Robertson             12/31/04        50,000        —        8.70        12/30/14        —        —        —        —          (2)        02/27/09        —        —        —        —        157,480        3,163,773        —        —          (3)        02/26/10        —        —        —        —        105,595        2,121,404        —        —          (4)        02/28/11        —        —        —        —        106,184        2,133,237        —        —    Philip A. Taylor     (3)        02/27/09        —        —        —        —        37,182        746,986        —        —          (3)        02/26/10        —        —        —        —        142,346        2,859,731        —        —          (5)        02/26/10        —        —        —        —        15,306        307,498        —        —          (4)        02/28/11        —        —        —        —        151,638        3,046,407        —        —    (1) Share options were granted in Pounds Sterling (£) and in this table have been converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate of $1.55/£1 as of December 31, 2011.2013 about the outstanding share awards held by our named executive officers. Name         Date of Grant   Number of Shares or Units that Have Not Vested (#)   Market Value of Shares or Units that Have Not Vested ($)   Equity Incentive Plan Awards that Have Not Vested (#)   Equity Incentive Plan Awards that Have Not  Vested ($) Martin L. Flanagan        (1 )       02/26/10         83,017         3,021,819         -         -            (2 )       02/28/11         155,551         5,662,056         -         -            (3 )       02/28/12         189,153         6,885,169         -         -            (4 )       02/28/12         -         -         61,749         2,247,664            (5 )       02/28/13         234,975         8,553,090         -         -            (6 )       02/28/13         -         -         76,707         2,792,135   Loren M. Starr        (1 )       02/26/10         21,505         782,782         -         -            (2 )       02/28/11         40,145         1,461,278         -         -            (3 )       02/28/12         48,978         1,782,799         -         -            (4 )       02/28/12         -         -         15,775         574,210            (5 )       02/28/13         59,483         2,165,181         -         -            (6 )       02/28/13         -         -         19,595         713,258   G. Mark Armour        (1 )       02/26/10         37,245         1,355,718         -         -            (2 )       02/28/11         57,750         2,102,100         -         -            (3 )       02/28/12         67,458         2,455,471         -         -            (4 )       02/28/12         -         -         21,184         771,098            (5 )       02/28/13         67,189         2,445,680         -         -            (6 )       02/28/13         -         -         19,596 ��       713,294   Andrew T. S. Lo        (1 )       02/26/10         24,133         878,441         -         -            (2 )       02/28/11         41,403         1,507,069         -         -            (3 )       02/28/12         51,006         1,856,618         -         -            (4 )       02/28/12         -         -         15,775         574,210            (5 )       02/28/13         62,216         2,264,662         -         -            (6 )       02/28/13         -         -         19,596         713,294   Philip A. Taylor        (7 )       02/26/10         47,448         1,727,107         -         -            (7 )       02/28/11         37,909         1,379,888         -         -            (3 )       02/28/12         93,449         3,401,544         -         -            (4 )       02/28/12         -         -         28,846         1,049,994            (5 )       02/28/13         116,088         4,225,603         -         -            (6 )       02/28/13         -         -         35,833         1,304,321   (1) February 26, 2010. Share award vests in four equal installments. As of December 31, 2013, the unvested share award represents 25% of the original grant. (2) Share award vests in four equal installments. As of December 31, 2011, (2) February 28, 2011. Share award vests in four equal installments. As of December 31, 2013, the unvested share award represents 50% of the original grant. (3) Share award vests in four equal installments. As of December 31, 2011, (3) February 28, 2012. Share award vests in four equal installments. As of December 31, 2013, the unvested share award represents 75% of the original grant. (4) Share award vests in four equal installments. As of December 31, 2011, (4) February 28, 2012. Performance-based share award vests in four equal installments. As of December 31, 2013, the unvested share award represents 75% of maximum award. (5) February 28, 2013. Share award vests in four equal installments. As of December 31, 2013, the unvested share award represents 100% of the original grant. (6) February 28, 2013. Performance-based share award vests in four equal installments. As of December 31, 2013, the unvested share award represents 100% of the maximum award. (7) February 26, 2010 and February 28, 2011 awards. Share awards vest in one installment. As of December 31, 2013, the unvested share award represents 100% of the original grant. Option Exercises and Shares Vested for 2013 The following table provides information about share options exercised by the named executive officers during 2013 and equity awards held by our named executive officers that vested in 2013:   (5) Share award vests       Option Awards    Share Awards   Name    Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)    Value Realized on Exercise ($)    Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)    Value Realized on Vesting ($) Martin L. Flanagan    —    —    330,929    8,739,843 Loren M. Starr    —    —      87,878    2,320,870 G. Mark Armour    —    —    156,909    4,139,325 Andrew T.S. Lo    50,000    1,112,554      96,840    2,556,180 Philip A. Taylor    —    —    153,766    4,401,696 Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in three equal annual installments. AsControl for 2013 The following tables summarize the estimated payments to be made under each agreement, plan or arrangement in effect as of December 31, 2011, the unvested share award represents two-thirds of the original grant. Option Exercises and Shares Vested for 2011 The following table provides information about share options exercised by the named executive officers during 2011 and equity awards held by our named executive officers that vested in 2011:       Option Awards      Share Awards       Name    Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)      Value Realized on Exercise ($)      Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)      Value Realized on Vesting ($)   Martin L. Flanagan      —         —         308,357         8,201,713    Loren M. Starr      —         —         39,182         1,037,513    G. Mark Armour      —         —         208,938         5,564,562    James I. Robertson      —         —         159,599         4,233,504    Philip A. Taylor      —         —         129,467         3,278,121    Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control for 2011 The following tables summarize the estimated payments to be made under each agreement, plan or arrangement in effect as of December 31, 20112013 which provides for payments to a named executive officer at, following or in connection with a termination of employment or a change in control. However, in accordance with SEC regulations, we do not report any amount to be provided to a named executive officer under any arrangement which does not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of our named executive officers and which is available generally to all salaried employees. In accordance with SEC regulations, this analysis assumes that the named executive officer’s date of termination is December 31, 2011, and the price per share of our common shares on the date of termination is the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on that date, which was $20.09. Martin L. Flanagan Benefit and Payments Upon Termination(1)   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)     Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)     Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)     Retirement ($)(2)     Death or Disability ($)     Change in Control ($)(3)     Qualified Termination Following Change in  Control ($)(4)   Salary Continuation     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Annual Cash Bonus(5)     4,750,000        4,750,000        —        —        4,750,000        —        4,750,000    Severance Payment(6)     —        13,889,978        —        —        —        —        13,889,978    Share Awards     —        14,729,205        —        —        14,729,205        14,729,205        14,729,205    Options     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Welfare Benefits(7)     —        44,220        —        —        —        —        44,220    (1) Pursuant to the terms of the second amended and restated master employment agreement effective January 1, 2011 between the company and Mr. Flanagan (the “Flanagan Agreement”), Mr. Flanagan is entitled to certain benefits upon termination of employment. Following any notice of termination, Mr. Flanagan would continue to receive salary and benefits compensation, and the vesting periods with respect to any outstanding share awards would continue to run, in the normal course until the date of termination. In accordance with SEC rules,regulations, this analysis assumes that the information presented in this table assumes a terminationnamed executive officer’s date of termination is December 31, 2013, and the price per share of our common shares on the date of termination is the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on that date, which was $36.40. Martin L. Flanagan Benefit and Payments  Upon Termination(1)   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)   Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)   Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)   Retirement ($)(2)   Death or Disability ($)   Change in Control ($)(3)   Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)(4) Salary Continuation   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Annual Cash Bonus (5)   4,750,000   4,750,000   —   —   4,750,000   —   4,750,000 Severance Payment (6)   —   13,889,960   —   —   —   —   13,889,960 Share Awards   —   29,161,933   —   —   29,161,933   29,161,933   29,161,933 Options   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Welfare Benefits (7)   —   49,341   —   —   —   —   49,341 (1) Pursuant to the terms of the second amended and restated master employment agreement effective January 1, 2011 between the company and Mr. Flanagan (the “Flanagan Agreement”), Mr. Flanagan is entitled to certain benefits upon termination of employment. Following any notice of termination, Mr. Flanagan would continue to receive salary and benefits compensation, and the vesting periods with respect to any outstanding share awards would continue to run, in the normal course until the date of termination. In accordance with SEC rules, the information presented in this table assumes a termination date of December 31, 2013 and that the applicable notice had been given prior to such date. (2) Pursuant to the terms of the 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, in the event of retirement, restricted stock units would continue to vest provided the age, years of service and holding period requirements are met. With respect to Mr. Flanagan’s share awards, no benefit would be payable in the event of retirement. (3) Payment would only be made in the event that the share award was not assumed, converted or replaced in connection with a change in control. (4) Assumes termination by Mr. Flanagan for “good reason” or a termination by the company other than for cause or disability following a change in control. (5) Pursuant to the terms of the Flanagan Agreement, Mr. Flanagan is entitled to an annual cash bonus that is equal to the greater of $4,750,000 or his most recent annual cash bonus upon certain terminations of employment. (6) Pursuant to the terms of the Flanagan Agreement, Mr. Flanagan’s severance payment is equal to the sum of (i) his base salary, (ii) the greater of $4,750,000 or his most recent annual cash bonus, and (iii) the fair market value at grant of his most recent equity award. (7) Pursuant to the terms of the Flanagan Agreement, Mr. Flanagan and his covered dependents are entitled to medical benefits for a period of 36 months following termination. Represents cost to the company for reimbursement of such medical benefits. Loren M. Starr Benefit and Payments Upon Termination(1)   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)   Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)   Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)   Retirement ($)(2)   Death or Disability ($)   Change in Control ($)(3)   Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)(4) Salary Continuation   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Annual Cash Bonus   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Severance Payment   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Share Awards   —   7,479,508   —   —   7,479,508   7,479,508   7,479,508 Options   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Welfare Benefits   —   —   —   —   —   —   — G. Mark Armour Benefit and Payments Upon Termination(1)   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)   Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)   Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)   Retirement ($)(2)   Death or Disability ($)   Change in Control ($)(3)   Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)(4) Salary Continuation   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Annual Cash Bonus   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Severance Payment   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Share Awards   —   9,843,361     1,355,718   9,843,361   9,843,361   9,843,361 Options   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Welfare Benefits   —   —   —   —   —   —   —   Andrew T.S. Lo       Benefit and Payments Upon Termination(1)   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)   Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by  the Company without Cause ($)   Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)   Retirement ($)(2)   Death or Disability ($)   Change in Control ($)(3)   Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)(4) Salary Continuation   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Annual Cash Bonus   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Severance Payment   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Share Awards   —   7,794,296   —   —   7,794,296   7,794,296   7,794,296 Options   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Welfare Benefits   —   —   —   —   —   —   —   Philip A. Taylor       Benefit and Payments Upon Termination(1)   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)   Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)   Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)   Retirement ($)(2)   Death or Disability ($)   Change in Control ($)(3)   Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)(4) Salary Continuation   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Annual Cash Bonus   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Severance Payment   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Share Awards   —   13,088,457   —   1,727,107   13,088,457   13,088,457   13,088,457 Options   —   —   —   —   —   —   — Welfare Benefits   —   —   —   —   —   —   — (1) Each of Messrs. Starr, Armour, Lo and Taylor is a party to an agreement that provides for a termination notice period of either six or twelve months. Following any notice of termination, the employee would continue to receive salary and benefits compensation, and the vesting periods with respect to any outstanding share awards would continue to run, in the normal course until the date of termination. In accordance with SEC rules, the information presented in this table assumes a termination date of December 31, 2013 and that the applicable notice had been given prior to such date. (2) Pursuant to the terms of the 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, restricted stock awards are forfeited in the event of retirement and restricted stock units continue to vest provided the holding period is met. With respect to Mr. Flanagan’s share awards, no benefit would be payable in the event of retirement. (2) Pursuant to the terms of the 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, in the event of retirement, restricted stock units would continue to vest provided the age, years of service and holding period requirements are met. This analysis assumes a retirement date of December 31, 2013 and that the previously described requirements had been met. With respect to Messrs. Armour and Taylor, a benefit in the respective amount of $1,355,718 and $1,727,107 would be payable on the scheduled 2014 vesting date with respect to their award that was granted in February 2010. These values represent an assumed value of $36.40, which was the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on December 31, 2013. Actual value to be received by the named executive officer will be the closing price of our common shares on the NYSE on the scheduled date of distribution. (3) Payment would only be made in the event that the share award was not assumed, converted or replaced in connection with a change in control. (4) Assumes termination for “good reason” or a termination by the company other than for cause or disability following a change in control. Information Regarding Equity Compensation Plans The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2013, about common shares that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.   (4) Assumes termination by Mr. Flanagan for “good reason” or a termination by the company other than for cause or disability following a change in control. (5) Pursuant to the terms of the Flanagan Agreement, Mr. Flanagan is entitled to an annual cash bonus that is equal to the greater of $4,750,000 or his most recent annual cash bonus upon certain terminations of employment. (6) Pursuant to the terms of the Flanagan Agreement, Mr. Flanagan’s severance payment is equal to the sum of (i) his base salary, (ii) the greater of $4,750,000 or his most recent annual cash bonus, and (iii) the fair market value at grant of his most recent equity award. (7) Pursuant to the terms of the Flanagan Agreement, Mr. Flanagan and his covered dependents are entitled to medical benefits for a period of 36 months following termination. Represents cost to the company for reimbursement of such medical benefits. Loren M. Starr Benefit and Payments Upon Termination(1)   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)     Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)     Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)     Retirement ($)(2)     Death or Disability ($)     Change in Control ($)(3)     Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)(4)   Salary Continuation     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Annual Cash Bonus     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Severance Payment     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Share Awards     —        3,038,130        —        —        3,038,130        3,038,130        3,038,130    Options     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Welfare Benefits     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    G. Mark Armour Benefit and Payments Upon Termination   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)     Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)     Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)     Retirement ($)(2)     Death or Disability ($)     Change in Control ($)(3)     Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)(4)   Salary Continuation     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Annual Cash Bonus     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Severance Payment     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Share Awards     —        7,025,855        —        —        7,025,855        7,025,855        7,025,855    Options     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Welfare Benefits     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    James I. Robertson Benefit and Payments Upon Termination(1)   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)     Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)     Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)     Retirement ($)(2)     Death or Disability ($)     Change in Control ($)(3)     Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)(4)   Salary Continuation     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Annual Cash Bonus     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Severance Payment     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Share Awards     —        7,418,414        —        —        7,418,414        7,418,414        7,418,414    Options(5)     509,406        509,406        —        509,406        509,406        509,406        509,406    Welfare Benefits     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Philip A. Taylor Benefit and Payments Upon Termination(1)   Voluntary Termination without Good Reason ($)     Termination by Executive for Good Reason or Involuntary Termination by the Company without Cause ($)     Involuntary Termination for Cause ($)     Retirement ($)(2)     Death or Disability ($)     Change in Control ($)(3)     Qualified Termination Following Change in Control ($)(4)   Salary Continuation     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Annual Cash Bonus     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Severance Payment     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Share Awards     —        6,960,622        —        —        6,960,622        6,960,622        6,960,622    Options     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Welfare Benefits     —        —        —        —        —        —        —    Name of Plan   Approved by Security Holders(1)   Active/ Inactive Plan(2)   Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights   Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights ($)(3)   Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Outstanding Options)(4) 2011 Global Equity Incentive Plan   ü   Active   —   N/A   17,705,846 2000 Share Option Plan   ü   Inactive   1,125,622     — Subtotal—Approved Plans       1,125,622   12.15   17,705,846 2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST)     Active   —   N/A   1,763,988 Subtotal — Unapproved Plans       —     1,763,988 Total           1,125,622       19,469,834   (1) Each of Messrs. Starr, Armour, Robertson and Taylor is a party to an agreement that provides for a termination notice period of either six or twelve months. Following any notice of termination, the employee would continue to receive salary and benefits compensation, and the vesting periods with respect to any outstanding share awards would continue to run, in the normal course until the date of termination. In accordance with SEC rules, the information presented in this table assumes a termination date of December 31, 2011 and that the applicable notice had been given prior to such date. (2) Pursuant to the terms of the 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, restricted stock awards are forfeited in the event of retirement and restricted stock units continue to vest provided the holding period is met. With respect to each of the named executive officers, no benefit would be payable in the event of retirement. (3) Payment would only be made in the event that the share award was not assumed, converted or replaced in connection with a change in control. (4) Assumes termination for “good reason” or a termination by the company other than for cause or disability following a change in control. (5) This analysis assumes that the named executive officer exercised the stock option on the date of termination. The value reported represents the difference between $20.09, which is the closing price of our common share on the NYSE on the date of termination, and the applicable stock option exercise price multiplied by the number of optioned shares. COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION During fiscal year 2011, the following directors served as members of the Compensation Committee: Sir John Banham (Chairman) and Rex D. Adams, Ben F. Johnson, III, Denis Kessler, Edward P. Lawrence and Phoebe A. Wood. No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the company or any of its subsidiaries during 2011, and no member of the Compensation Committee was formerly an officer of the company or any of its subsidiaries or was a party to any disclosable related person transaction involving the company. During 2011, none of the executive officers of the company has served on the board of directors or on the compensation committee of any other entity that has or had executive officers serving as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of the company. * * * REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP AND ROLE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Invesco Ltd. consists of J. Thomas Presby (Chairman), Sir John Banham, C. Robert Henrikson, Ben F. Johnson, III, Denis Kessler, Edward P. Lawrence and Phoebe A. Wood. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as such term is defined under the NYSE listing standards and applicable law. The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee (i) the company’s financial reporting, auditing and internal control activities, including the integrity of the company’s financial statements, (ii) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, (iii) the performance of the company’s internal audit function and independent auditor, and (iv) the company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee’s function is more fully described in its written charter, which is available on the corporate governance section of the company’s Web site atwww.invesco.com. REVIEW OF THE COMPANY’S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 with the company’s management. The Audit Committee has also performed the other reviews and duties set forth in its charter. The Audit Committee has discussed with Ernst & Young LLP (“E&Y”), the company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by professional auditing standards. The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from E&Y required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed the independence of E&Y with that firm. Based on the Audit Committee’s review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the company’s Annual Report for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Respectfully submitted by the Audit Committee: J. Thomas Presby (Chairman) Sir John Banham C. Robert Henrikson(1) Ben F. Johnson, III Denis Kessler Edward P. Lawrence Phoebe A. Wood (1) Mr. Henrikson was recently elected as a member of the Audit Committee and was not a member of the committee during the period covered by this report. FEES PAID TO INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Audit Committee of the Board, with the approval of the shareholders, engaged E&Y to perform an annual audit of the company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2011. The following table sets forth the approximate aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed to the company by E&Y for fiscal years 2011 and 2010 for the audit of the company’s annual consolidated financial statements and for other services rendered by E&Y.       Fiscal Year         2011      2010         ($ in millions)   Audit Fees(1)      4.2         4.3    Audit-Related Fees(2)      1.8         1.9    Tax Fees(3)      0.7         0.6    All Other Fees(4)      —         —    TOTAL FEES      6.7         6.8    (1) The 2011 Audit Fees amount includes approximately $2.4 million (2010: $2.3 million) for audits of the company’s consolidated financial statements and $1.6 million (2010: $1.5 million) for statutory audits of subsidiaries. These amounts do not include fees paid to E&Y associated with audits conducted on certain of our affiliated mutual funds, unit trusts and partnerships. (2) Audit-Related Fees consist of attest services not required by statute or regulation, audits of employee benefit plans and accounting consultations in connection with new accounting pronouncements and acquisitions. (3) Tax Fees consist of compliance and advisory services. (4) All Other Fees consist principally of transaction-related services. PRE-APPROVAL PROCESS AND POLICY The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for pre-approving all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors. The policy is designed to ensure that the auditor’s independence is not impaired. The policy sets forth the Audit Committee’s views on audit, audit-related, tax and other services. It provides that, before the company engages the independent auditor to render any service, the engagement must either be specifically approved by the Audit Committee or fall into one of the defined categories that have been pre-approved. The policy defines the services and the estimated range of fees for such services that the committee has pre-approved. The term of any such categorical approval is 12 months, unless the committee specifically provides otherwise, and the policy requires the related fee levels to be set annually. Where actual invoices in respect of any service are materially in excess of the estimated range, the committee must approve such excess amount prior to payment. The policy also prohibits the company from engaging the auditors to provide certain defined non-audit services that are prohibited under SEC rules. Under the policy, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members, but may not delegate such authority to the company’s management. Under the policy, our management must inform the Audit Committee of each service performed by our independent auditor pursuant to the policy. Requests to the Audit Committee for separate approval must be submitted by both the independent auditor and our chief financial officer and the request must include a joint statement as to whether it is deemed consistent with the SEC’s and PCAOB’s rules on auditor independence. All audit and non-audit services provided to the company and its subsidiaries by E&Y during fiscal year 2011 were either specifically approved or pre-approved under the policy. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS Share Repurchases.    In order to pay withholding or other similar taxes due in connection with the vesting of equity awards granted under the 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, the 2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST) and the Global Stock Plan, employee participants, including our named executive officers, may elect the “net shares” method whereby the company purchases from the participant shares equal in value to the tax liability in connection with vesting equity awards. Under the “net shares” method, the price per share paid by the company for repurchases is the closing price of the company’s common shares on the NYSE on the vesting date. During fiscal 2011, the company repurchased common shares from the executive officers for the aggregate consideration shown in the following table: Name and Title    Number of Shares Repurchased (#)      Aggregate Consideration ($)   Martin L. Flanagan      51,078         1,370,934    President and Chief Executive Officer         Loren M. Starr      31,203         828,946    Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer         G. Mark Armour      85,030         2,263,809    Senior Managing Director         James Robertson      75,481         2,000,844    Senior Managing Director         Philip A. Taylor      60,084         1,459,206    Senior Managing Director         Kevin M. Carome      26,358         701,038    Senior Managing Director and General Counsel         Karen Dunn Kelley      20,970         555,870    Senior Managing Director         Colin D. Meadows      38,282         1,015,832    Senior Managing Director                   Interests in or Alongside Invesco-Sponsored Private Funds.    Some of our employees, their spouses, related charitable foundations or entities they own or control are provided the opportunity to invest in or alongside Invesco-sponsored private funds that we offer to independent investors. We generally limit such investments to employees that meet certain accreditation requirements. Employees who make such investments usually do not pay management or performance fees charged to independent investors. Distributions exceeding $120,000 from Invesco-sponsored private funds during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 made to our executive officers (or persons or entities affiliated with them) or directors, consisting of profits, other income and return of capital (but excluding Profits Interests, as defined below) are as follows: Martin L. Flanagan — $226,810. Certain of our employees, including some of our executive officers, receive the right to share in performance fees earned by Invesco (“Profits Interests”) in connection with our management of Invesco-sponsored private funds. Messrs. Flanagan, Armour, Carome and Lo have made investments in or alongside Invesco-sponsored private funds. Messrs. Armour, Carome and Lo have received Profits Interests in one of those funds. The Profits Interests vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period and are subject to forfeiture prior to vesting upon the occurrence of certain events. There were no distributions exceeding $120,000 from Invesco-sponsored private funds during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 made to our executive officers or directors (or persons or entities affiliated with them) in respect of Profits Interests. RELATED PERSON TRANSACTION POLICY The Board of Directors has adopted written Policies and Procedures with Respect to Related Person Transactions to address the review, approval, disapproval or ratification of related person transactions. “Related persons” include the company’s executive officers, directors, director nominees, holders of more than five percent (5%) of the company’s voting securities, immediate family members of the foregoing persons, and any entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed, is a partner or is in a similar position, or in which such person has a 5% or greater ownership interest. A “related person transaction” means a transaction or series of transactions in which the company participates, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related person has a direct or indirect interest (with certain exceptions permitted by SEC rules). Examples might include sales, purchases and transfers of real or personal property, use of property and equipment by lease or otherwise, services received or furnished and borrowings and lendings, including guarantees. Management is required to present for the approval or ratification of the Audit Committee all material information regarding an actual or potential related person transaction. The policy requires that, after reviewing such information, the disinterested members of the Audit Committee will approve or disapprove the transaction. Approval will be given only if the Audit Committee determines that such transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the company and its shareholders. The policy further requires that in the event management becomes aware of a related person transaction that has not been previously approved or ratified, it must be submitted to the Audit Committee promptly. The policy also permits the chairman of the Audit Committee to review and approve related person transactions in accordance with the terms of the policy between scheduled committee meetings. Any determination made pursuant to this delegated authority must be reported to the full Audit Committee at the next regularly-scheduled meeting. SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the company’s common shares to file reports of ownership on Form 3 and reports of changes in ownership on Forms 4 or 5 with the SEC. The reporting officers, directors and 10% shareholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish the company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on its review of copies of such reports, the company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders were complied with during fiscal year 2011. PROPOSAL NO. 2 ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION GENERAL The Dodd-Frank Act enables our shareholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (nonbinding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules. We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. Invesco’s compensation programs, including particularly our annual incentive pools, are tied to the achievement of our strategic and financial results and our success in serving our clients’ and shareholders’ interests. As further described below, despite continued global market volatility, Invesco performed strongly in 2011, with material increases in certain key financial measures. Our results were also driven in part by a major acquisition in June 2010, the integration of which was largely completed in 2011.While our financial results were strong, and we continued to make substantial progress against our strategic objectives, the committee determined that our company-wide incentive pools should remain generally unchanged from last year on an average per-person basis. This determination reflected the committee’s balancing of the company’s objectives to invest in key strategic growth initiatives, to attract and retain high-performing employees and to deliver appropriate returns to our shareholders. In light of the above, the committee determined to leave incentive compensation for our named executive officers at the same level as, or slightly lower than, last year and to maintain their salaries at substantially the same levels in place since 2007. For more information regarding our incentive pools and how they are determined, see the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — How Compensation is Determined for Our Executive Officers” below. What Is New in 2011 Consideration of 2011 Say-on-Pay Vote.    In establishing 2011 compensation for our named executive officers, the committee considered discussions that were held with shareholders prior to the advisory vote and reviewed the results of the advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay vote”) held at last year’s annual meeting. While the say-on-pay vote passed with a majority of shareholders in favor (56% in favor), the committee sought to understand the reasons for the low majority by conducting, via senior management, discussions with our largest shareholders to identify any concerns regarding our executive compensation practices and constructively address them. In addition to discussions with our shareholders, the committee implemented the following improvements to our compensation programs: • adopted equity award vesting provisions based on achievement of targeted financial measures for a portion of the 2011 long-term incentive awards to executive officers, as described in detail below; • greatly enhanced the disclosure of our prudent and longstanding process by which compensation decisions for executive officers are made by the committee; and • adopted a “clawback” policy applicable to our executive officers’ long-term equity awards subject to achievement of targeted financial results, as described in detail below, which permits the company to recover compensation based on fraudulent or willful misconduct. 30% of each executive officer’s 2011 long-term equity awards is subject to vesting only if certain financial measures are achieved during the award’s vesting periods Adoption of Targeted Financial Results Vesting Requirements.    In order to further emphasize the importance of long-term performance, and in response to shareholder concerns, the committee has implemented a modified long-term equity award structure for our executive officers. In order to further align employee and shareholder interests, the committee has determined that a portion of such awards for executive officers should be paid only upon achievement of targeted company financial results. Vesting of the financial measures-based portion (30%) of the 2011 long-term equity awards for executive officers is tied to the achievement of specified levels of adjusted operating margin or adjusted diluted earnings per share.1 For more information regarding the long-term equity awards made to our executive officers, including our named executive officers, see the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION – Compensation Discussion and Analysis -About Our Equity Awards”. What Has Remained the Same in 2011 We have maintained our commitment to aligning executive compensation with financial and strategic results,including: •  a robust and prudent process undertaken by the committee to align compensation with financial and strategic performance over the long-term; •  a history of disciplined decision-making over multiple years, including directly linking incentive compensation pools to a narrow range of our pre-cash bonus operating income (“PCBOI”), thereby ensuring incentive compensation is paid only when we are generating operating income; •  base salaries for our NEOs limited to on average approximately 10% of their total annual compensation; and •  compensation for our executive officers that is heavily weighted to deferred compensation (60-70%) – in the form of equity awards that vest over four (4) years, a portion of which is tied to the financial performance of Invesco, and is thus aligned with the interests of our shareholders. We have continued our sound governance practices, including: •  maintaining share ownership guidelines for our directors and executive officers, thereby creating a clear link between management interests, company performance and shareholder value; •  continuing not to provide excise tax “gross ups;” •  maintaining the requirement of “double triggers” on the vesting of equity awards in the event of a change in control; •  maintaining our insider trading policy that prohibits short selling, dealing in publicly-traded options and hedging or monetization transactions in our common shares; and •  including in our equity incentive plans certain provisions prohibiting option re-pricing absent approval of our shareholders. 1 Adjusted operating margin and adjusted diluted earnings per share are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see pages 56 through 60 of our Annual Report for a presentation of, and reconciliation to, the most directly comparable GAAP measures. 2011 Financial Performance Along with the rest of our industry, Invesco was challenged during 2011 by extremely volatile global markets and a global economy that continues to be under pressure. In spite of the volatility of world financial markets, Invesco remains very well positioned to succeed over the long term: • our investment performance is solid, as evidenced by positive investment flows in 2011; • we have built a strong global operating platform; and • we have a global, diversified client base and a comprehensive range of capabilities and products. Despite continued global market volatility, our senior management team guided the company to achieve solid improvements during 2011 in key measures of our financial performance, as shown below. Measure1   2011 Actual Results2    Change from 20102    2010 Actual Results2   2009  Actual Results Assets Under Management (“AUM”) as of December 31   $625B    +1.3%    $617B   $460B Adjusted Operating Income   $1,069M    +19.0%    $898M   $566M Adjusted Operating Margin   36.9%    +1.3 pts    35.6%   29.1% Adjusted Diluted EPS   $1.68    +21.7%    $1.38   $0.89 1 Adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin and adjusted diluted earnings per share are non-GAAP financial measures. Please see pages 56 through 60 of our Annual Report, for a presentation of, and reconciliation to, the most directly comparable GAAP measures. 2 The 2011 results include a full year of activity for the acquired Morgan Stanley retail asset management business. The 2010 results include seven months of activity following the June 1, 2010 acquisition. 2011 Progress Against Our Strategic Objectives Throughout the year, we continued to make substantial progress against our long-term strategic objectives. Significant achievements across all areas of our business further positioned us for growth and long-term success, including: • continued superior investment performance for our clients; • focusing on strengthening and deepening relationships with our clients; • further enhancement of our ability to meet client needs by focusing product offerings and pursuing targeted expansion in areas of strong investor demand; • continued successful integration of a major acquisition; • successfully implementing major organizational changes, resulting in increased collaboration across regions and greater leveraging of global support capabilities; and • significantly reinvesting in employee talent through continued internal development and a number of strategic new hires. Martin L. Flanagan, CEO and President 2011 Total Compensation* Change from Prior Year $12.89M 0% * Consists of salary, annual cash bonus, annual stock deferral award and long-term equity award earned in 2011 — see note on p.32 regarding differences from the Summary Compensation Table (“SCT”) Summary of Named Executive Officer Compensation Our chief executive officer’s total annual compensation for 2011 remained unchanged compared to his total compensation for 2010. While our financial results were strong in 2011, and we continued to make substantial progress against our strategic objectives, the committee determined to not increase compensation for the CEO in light of the relatively unchanged 2011 firm-wide incentive pools on an average per-person basis, as compared to last year. Total annual compensation for 2011 for our other named executive officers similarly remained unchanged or decreased slightly compared to 2010. For more information regarding each other named executive officer’s annual compensation, see the caption “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION — Compensation Discussion and Analysis — 2011 Named Executive Officer Compensation.” Accordingly, we will ask our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual General Meeting: “RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2012 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion.” The say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.The voting requirements for this proposal are described in the “Questions and Answers About Voting Your Common Shares” section above. PROPOSAL NO. 3 APPROVAL OF THE INVESCO LTD. 2012 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN Company Proposal We are asking our shareholders to approve the Invesco Ltd. 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”), which will make 3,000,000 common shares of the company available for purchase by employees at a discount of 15% off the fair market value of the shares. Why We Support the Proposal We believe that the ESPP will align the long-term interests of our employees with those of our shareholders.    Although a significant portion of our senior-level employees already own common shares of the company, the ESPP is intended to provide an incentive for more employees to purchase an equity interest in the company and to increase that equity interest over time. We believe that the ownership of shares purchased under the ESPP will provide an incentive to employees to increase shareholder value. We believe that the ESPP will provide a tool for retaining employees.    If approved by shareholders, the ESPP would enable employees to set aside a portion of their regular earnings through periodic payroll deductions over a specified period and use those amounts to purchase common shares of the company at a discount. Because employees would generally need to be employed by the company (or a subsidiary or affiliate of the company) at the end of the applicable period to obtain the benefit of the discount, we believe that the ESPP will provide an incentive for employees to continue their employment with the company (and its subsidiaries and affiliates) and will promote a stable, motivated workforce that will benefit all shareholders. Information Regarding Other Equity Compensation Plans Information as of December 31, 2011.    The following table sets forth information, as of December 31, 2011, about common shares that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans. Name of Plan    Approved by Security Holders(1)      Active/ Inactive Plan(2)      Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights      Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights ($)(3)      Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Outstanding Options)(4)   2011 Global Equity Incentive Plan    ü           Active         —         N/A         27,622,632    2000 Share Option Plan    ü           Inactive         3,969,448         11.50         —    Subtotal — Approved Plans            3,969,448            27,622,632    2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST)         Active         —         N/A         1,429,038    No. 3 Executive Share Option Scheme         Inactive         533,491         17.43         —    Subtotal — Unapproved Plans            533,491            1,429,038    Total                        4,502,939                  29,051,670    (1) Prior to December 4, 2007, the company was listed on the London Stock Exchange. With respect to the No. 3 Executive Share Option Scheme, shareholder approval of the plan at the time of adoption was not required under the rules of the London Stock Exchange or otherwise. With respect to the 2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST), shares are issued only as employment inducement awards in connection with a strategic transaction and, as a result, do not require shareholder approval under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise. (2) No (2) With respect to the 2000 Share Option Plan, no further grants will be made under this plan. (3) Share options were granted in Pounds Sterling (£) and in this table have been converted to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate of $1.66/£1 as of December 31, 2013. With respect to the 2000 Share Option Plan, outstanding stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.4 years. (4) Excludes unvested restricted stock awards, unvested deferred share awards and unvested restricted stock units. Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation During fiscal year 2013, the following directors served as members of the Compensation Committee: Sir John Banham (Chairman), Rex D. Adams, C. Robert Henrikson, Ben F. Johnson III, Denis Kessler, Edward P. Lawrence, G. Richard Wagoner, Jr. and Phoebe A. Wood. No member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of the company or any of its subsidiaries during 2013, and no member of the Compensation Committee was formerly an officer of the company or any of its subsidiaries or was a party to any disclosable related person transaction involving the company. During 2013, none of the executive officers of the company has served on the board of directors or on the compensation committee of any other entity that has or had executive officers serving as a member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of the company. * * * Report of the Audit Committee Membership and Role of the Audit Committee The Audit Committee of the Board consists of J. Thomas Presby (Chairman), Sir John Banham, C. Robert Henrikson, Ben F. Johnson III, Denis Kessler, Edward P. Lawrence, G. Richard Wagoner, Jr. and Phoebe A. Wood. Each of the members of the Audit Committee is independent as such term is defined under the NYSE listing standards and applicable law. The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee (i) the company’s financial reporting, auditing and internal control activities, including the integrity of the company’s financial statements, (ii) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence, (iii) the performance of the company’s internal audit function and independent auditor, and (iv) the company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit Committee’s function is more fully described in its written charter, which is available on the corporate governance section of the company’s Web site. Review of the Company’s Audited Consolidated Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2013 The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 with the company’s management. The Audit Committee has also performed the other reviews and duties set forth in its charter. The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), the company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by professional auditing standards. The Audit Committee has also received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the audit committee concerning independence, and has discussed the independence of PwC with that firm. Based on the Audit Committee’s review and discussions noted above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the company’s Annual Report for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Respectfully submitted by the Audit Committee: J. Thomas Presby (Chairman) Sir John Banham C. Robert Henrikson Ben F. Johnson III Denis Kessler Edward P. Lawrence G. Richard Wagoner, Jr. Phoebe A. Wood Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Audit Committee of the Board, with the approval of the shareholders, engaged PwC to perform an annual audit of the company’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2013. The following table sets forth the approximate aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed to the company by PwC for fiscal year 2013 and by Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), our former independent auditors, for fiscal year 2012 for the audit of the company’s annual consolidated financial statements and for other services rendered by PwC in 2013 and EY in 2012.      Fiscal Year       2013    2012      ($ in millions) Audit Fees(1)    3.9    4.8 Audit-Related Fees(2)    1.4    1.8 Tax Fees(3)    0.3    0.6 All Other Fees(4)    —    — TOTAL FEES    5.6    7.2 (1) The 2013 Audit Fees amount includes approximately $2.5 million (2012: $2.7 million) for audits of the company’s consolidated financial statements and $1.4 million (2012: $1.6 million) for statutory audits of subsidiaries. These amounts do not include fees paid to PwC in 2013 and EY in 2012 associated with audits conducted on certain of our affiliated mutual funds, unit trusts and partnerships. (2) Audit-Related Fees consist of attest services not required by statute or regulation, audits of employee benefit plans and accounting consultations in connection with new accounting pronouncements and acquisitions. (3) Tax Fees consist of compliance and advisory services. (4) All Other Fees consist principally of transaction-related services. Pre-Approval Process and Policy The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures for pre-approving all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditors. The policy is designed to ensure that the auditor’s independence is not impaired. The policy sets forth the Audit Committee’s views on audit, audit-related, tax and other services. It provides that, before the company engages the independent auditor to render any service, the engagement must either be specifically approved by the Audit Committee or fall into one of the defined categories that have been pre-approved. The policy defines the services and the estimated range of fees for such services that the committee has pre-approved. The term of any such categorical approval is 12 months, unless the committee specifically provides otherwise, and the policy requires the related fee levels to be set annually. Where actual invoices in respect of any service are materially in excess of the estimated range, the committee must approve such excess amount prior to payment. The policy also prohibits the company from engaging the auditors to provide certain defined non-audit services that are prohibited under SEC rules. Under the policy, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members, but may not delegate such authority to the company’s management. Under the policy, our management must inform the Audit Committee of each service performed by our independent auditor pursuant to the policy. Requests to the Audit Committee for separate approval must be submitted by both the independent auditor and our Chief Financial Officer and the request must include a joint statement as to whether it is deemed consistent with the SEC’s and PCAOB’s rules on auditor independence. All audit and non-audit services provided to the company and its subsidiaries by PwC during fiscal year 2013 and by EY during fiscal year 2012 were either specifically approved or pre-approved under the policy. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Share Repurchases.    In order to pay withholding or other similar taxes due in connection with the vesting of equity awards granted under the 2011 Global Equity Incentive Plan, the 2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST), 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, and the Global Stock Plan, employee participants, including our named executive officers, may elect the “net shares” method whereby the company purchases from the participant shares equal in value to the tax withholding liability in connection with vesting equity awards. Under the “net shares” method, the price per share paid by the company for repurchases is the closing price of the company’s common shares on the NYSE on the distribution date. During fiscal 2013, the company repurchased common shares from the executive officers for the aggregate consideration shown in the following table: Name and Title    Number of Shares Repurchased (#)      Aggregate Consideration ($) G. Mark Armour Senior Managing Director and Head of EMEA    27,727         731,958 Kevin M. Carome Senior Managing Director and General Counsel    28,925         764,577 Karen Dunn Kelley Senior Managing Director, Investments    38,042      1,005,672 Colin D. Meadows Senior Managing Director and Chief Administrative Officer    51,857      1,368,351 Loren M. Starr Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer    41,347      1,092,592 Philip A. Taylor Senior Managing Director and Head of the Americas    76,162      2,180,207 Interests in or Alongside Invesco-Sponsored Private Funds.    Some of our employees, their spouses, related charitable foundations or entities they own or control are provided the opportunity to invest in or alongside Invesco-sponsored private funds that we offer to independent investors. We generally limit such investments to employees that meet certain accreditation requirements. Employees who make such investments usually do not pay management or performance fees charged to independent investors. Distributions exceeding $120,000 from Invesco-sponsored private funds during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 made to our executive officers (or persons or entities affiliated with them) or directors, consisting of profits, other income and return of capital (but excluding Profits Interests, as defined below) are as follows: Martin L. Flanagan — $229,839. Certain of our employees, including some of our executive officers, receive the right to share in performance fees earned by Invesco (“Profits Interests”) in connection with our management of Invesco-sponsored private funds. Messrs. Flanagan, Armour, Carome and Lo have made investments in or alongside Invesco-sponsored private funds. Messrs. Armour, Carome and Lo have received Profits Interests in one of those funds. The Profits Interests vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period and are subject to forfeiture prior to vesting upon the occurrence of certain events. There were no distributions exceeding $120,000 from Invesco-sponsored private funds during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 made to our executive officers or directors (or persons or entities affiliated with them) in respect of Profits Interests. Related Person Transaction Policy The Board of Directors has adopted written Policies and Procedures with Respect to Related Person Transactions to address the review, approval, disapproval or ratification of related person transactions. “Related persons” include the company’s executive officers, directors, director nominees, holders of more than five percent (5%) of the company’s voting securities, immediate family members of the foregoing persons, and any entity in which any of the foregoing persons is employed, is a partner or is in a similar position, or in which such person has a 5% or greater ownership interest. A “related person transaction” means a transaction or series of transactions in which the company participates, the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and a related person has a direct or indirect interest (with certain exceptions permitted by SEC rules). Management is required to present for the approval or ratification of the Audit Committee all material information regarding an actual or potential related person transaction. The policy requires that, after reviewing such information, the disinterested members of the Audit Committee will approve or disapprove the transaction. Approval will be given only if the Audit Committee determines that such transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, the best interests of the company and its shareholders. The policy further requires that in the event management becomes aware of a related person transaction that has not been previously approved or ratified, it must be submitted to the Audit Committee promptly. The policy also permits the chairman of the Audit Committee to review and approve related person transactions in accordance with the terms of the policy between scheduled committee meetings. Any determination made under inactive plans. pursuant to this delegated authority must be reported to the full Audit Committee at the next regularly-scheduled meeting. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires officers, directors and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the company’s common shares to file reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. The reporting officers, directors and 10% shareholders are also required by SEC rules to furnish the company with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based solely on its review of copies of such reports, the company believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its directors, executive officers and 10% shareholders were complied with during fiscal year 2013. Proposal No. 3 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation   (3) Share options were granted in Pounds Sterling (£) and General The Dodd-Frank Act enables our shareholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (nonbinding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this tableproxy statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules. We are asking our shareholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives our shareholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies and practices described in this proxy statement. Accordingly, we are asking our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual General Meeting: “RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of the named executive officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2014 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s compensation disclosure rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and related narrative discussion.” Invesco’s compensation programs, particularly our annual incentive pools, are tied to the achievement of our strategic and financial results and our success in serving our clients’ and shareholders’ interests, as further described in “Executive Compensation” above In considering their vote, we urge shareholders to review the information included in this Proxy Statement in “Executive Compensation.” Our Board of Directors and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against the named executive officer compensation as disclosed in this proxy statement, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns, and the Compensation Committee will evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. Under the Board’s current policy, shareholders are given an opportunity to cast an advisory vote on this topic annually, with the next opportunity occurring in connection with the 2015 Annual General Meeting. At the 2013 Annual General Meeting, 95.8% of the votes cast were in favor of the advisory proposal to approve our named executive officer compensation. Although we believe that the 2013 vote conveyed our shareholders’ strong support of the Compensation Committee’s decisions and the existing executive compensation programs, during the balance of 2013 and early 2014, we continued to actively seek investor input to obtain ongoing feedback concerning our compensation programs. While all of the shareholders we spoke with agree on the importance of pay and performance alignment, there was no consensus among these shareholders on how alignment should be measured. A number of the shareholders indicated that their Say-on-Pay decisions are made on a case-by-case basis and that they have not had any issues with Invesco’s compensation in prior years, some noting in particular that they believe appropriate decisions have been convertedmade for NEO compensation. Our largest shareholders do not share a consistent philosophy regarding the structure of compensation. That said, all shareholders affirmed the importance of clear disclosure and transparency regarding the decision making process undertaken by the Compensation Committee. Based on this feedback the Compensation Committee determined to U.S. dollars usingcontinue our current compensation practices as described in the exchange rate“Compensation Discussion and Analysis” above. Recommendation of $1.55/£1the Board THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO THE COMPENSATION DISCLOSURE RULES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. This proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual General Meeting.  Proposal No. 4 Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm General The Audit Committee of the Board has proposed the appointment of PwC as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 and to audit the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. With2014. During and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, PwC audited and rendered opinions on the financial statements of the company and certain of its subsidiaries. PwC also rendered an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In addition, PwC provides the company with tax consulting and compliance services, accounting and financial reporting advice on transactions and regulatory filings and certain other services not prohibited by applicable auditor independence requirements. See “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” above. Representatives of PwC are expected to be present at the Annual General Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. It is also expected that they will be available to respond to appropriate questions. Previous Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm During and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, EY audited and rendered opinions on the financial statements of the company and certain of its subsidiaries. EY also rendered an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In addition, EY provided the company with tax consulting and compliance services, accounting and financial reporting advice on transactions and regulatory filings and certain other services not prohibited by applicable auditor independence requirements as set forth above. On February 25, 2013, the company notified EY of its decision to dismiss EY, effective as of that date, and to appoint another independent registered public accounting firm. The decision to change independent registered public accounting firms was approved by Invesco’s Audit Committee. On February 28, 2013, Invesco engaged PwC as its new independent registered public accounting firm, effective immediately. The decision to engage PwC as Invesco’s independent registered public accounting firm was approved by Invesco’s Audit Committee. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and through February 28, 2013, the date of PwC’s engagement, Invesco did not consult with PwC regarding any of the matters or events set forth in Item 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K. EY’s reports on Invesco’s financial statements for two fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles. During the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, and in the subsequent period through February 25, 2013, the date of EY’s dismissal, there were no disagreements with EY on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of EY, would have caused EY to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with their reports on our financial statements for such periods. There were no “reportable events” (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K) during the two fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, or in the subsequent period through February 25, 2013. Recommendation of the Board THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPOINTMENT OF PWC AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2014. This proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast at the Annual General Meeting. If the appointment is not approved, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of PwC as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Security Ownership of Principal Shareholders The following table sets forth the common shares beneficially owned as of February 15, 2014 by each shareholder known to us to beneficially own more than five percent of the company’s outstanding common shares. The percentage of ownership indicated in the following table is based on 431,527,336 common shares outstanding as of February 15, 2014. Name and Address of Beneficial Owner    Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)   Percent of Class T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202    38,206,144(2)   8.9% FMR LLC, 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210    30,721,160(3)   7.1% BlackRock, Inc., 40 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10022    24,056,131(4)   5.6% The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355    23,197,923(5)   5.4% JPMorgan Chase & Co., 270 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017    23,158,117(6)   5.4% (1) Except as described otherwise in the footnotes to this table, each beneficial owner in the table has sole voting and investment power with regard to the shares beneficially owned by such owner. (2) On February 11, 2014, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., on behalf of itself and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Price Associates”) filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC indicating that T. Rowe Price had sole voting power with respect to 12,717,531 common shares, and sole investment power with respect to 38,167,344 common shares, of Invesco. These securities are owned by various individual and institutional investors for which Price Associates serves as an investment advisor with power to direct investments and/or sole power to vote the securities. For the purposes of the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, Price Associates is deemed to be a beneficial owner of such securities; however, Price Associates expressly disclaims that it is, in fact, the beneficial owner of such securities. (3) On February 14, 2014, FMR LLC, on behalf of itself and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Fidelity”) filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC indicating that Fidelity had sole voting power with respect to 6,760,242 common shares, and sole investment power with respect to 30,721,160 common shares, of Invesco. (4) On February 3, 2014, BlackRock, Inc., on behalf of itself and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “BlackRock”) filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC indicating that BlackRock had sole voting power with respect to 19,880,850 common shares and sole investment power with respect to 24,056,131 common shares, of Invesco. (5) On February 11, 2014, The Vanguard Group, on behalf of itself and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Vanguard”) filed a Schedule 13G with the SEC indicating that Vanguard had sole voting power with respect to 722,894 common shares, sole investment power with respect to 22,520,831 common shares and shared investment power with respect to 677,092 shares, of Invesco. (6) On January 28, 2014, JPMorgan Chase & Co. on behalf of itself and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, “JPMorgan Chase & Co.”) filed a Schedule 13G/A with the SEC indicating that they had sole voting power with respect to 21,237,478 common shares, sole investment power with respect to 22,978, 248 common shares, shared voting power with respect to 142,028 common shares, and shared investment power with respect to 179,869 common shares, of Invesco. Security Ownership of Management The following table lists the common shares beneficially owned as of February 15, 2014 by (i) each director and director nominee, (ii) each executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table below, and (iii) all current directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group. The percentage of ownership indicated in the following table is based on 431,527,336 of the company’s common shares outstanding on February 15, 2014. Beneficial ownership reported in the below table has been determined according to SEC regulations and includes common shares that may be acquired within 60 days after February 15, 2014, but excludes deferred shares which are disclosed in a separate column. Unless otherwise indicated, all directors, director nominees and executive officers have sole voting and investment power with respect to the 2000 Share Option Plan,shares shown. No shares are pledged as security. As of February 15, 2014, no individual director, director nominee or named executive officer owned beneficially 1% or more of our common shares, and our directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group owned approximately 1.7% of our outstanding stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 2.90 years. With respect to the No. 3 Executive Share Option Scheme, outstanding stock options have a weighted average remaining contractual life of 0.6 years. common shares.   (4) Excludes unvested restricted stock awards, unvested Name    Common Shares Beneficially Owned    Deferred Share Awards(1)      Total Rex D. Adams        66,534          -            66,534   Sir John Banham        19,104          -            19,104   Joseph R. Canion        31,182          5,925            37,107   Martin L. Flanagan (2)        3,822,150          -            3,822,150   C. Robert Henrikson        7,063          -            7,063   Ben F. Johnson III        19,085          -            19,085   Denis Kessler        31,329          -            31,329   Edward P. Lawrence        29,582          -            29,582   J. Thomas Presby(3)        18,805                 18,805   G. Richard Wagoner, Jr.(4)        5,714          -            5,714   Phoebe A. Wood(5)        16,147          -            16,147   G. Mark Armour        255,539          162,453            417,992   Andrew T. S. Lo        187,685          178,758            366,443   Loren M. Starr        397,826          -            397,826   Philip A. Taylor        240,753          294,894            535,647   All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (18 persons)        6,811,775          681,225            7,493,000   (1) For Mr. Canion, represents deferred shares awarded under our legacy Deferred Fees Share Plan. For the named executive officers, represents Restricted Stock Units under the 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan and 2011 Global Equity Incentive Plan, as applicable. None of the shares subject to such awards may be voted or transferred by the participant. (2) For Mr. Flanagan, includes an aggregate of 3,020,498 shares held in trust and 400 shares held by Mr. Flanagan’s spouse. Mr. Flanagan has shared voting and investment power with respect to these shares. (3) For Mr. Presby, includes 17,944 shares held in trust via a defined benefit account. Mr. Presby has sole voting and investment power with respect to these shares. (4) For Mr. Wagoner, includes 5,000 shares held in trust via a defined benefit account. Mr. Wagoner has sole voting and investment power with respect to these shares. (5) Ms. Wood has shared voting and investment power with respect to 64 shares. General Information Regarding the Annual General Meeting Questions and unvested restricted stock units.Answers About Voting Your Common Shares Why did I receive this Proxy Statement? You have received these proxy materials because Invesco’s Board of Directors is soliciting your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual General Meeting on May 15, 2014. This proxy statement includes information that is designed to assist you in voting your shares and information that we are required to provide to you under SEC rules. What is a proxy? A “proxy” is a written authorization from you to another person that allows such person (the “proxy holder”) to vote your shares on your behalf. The Board of Directors is asking you to allow any of the following persons to vote your shares at the Annual General Meeting: Rex D. Adams, Chairman of the Board of Directors; Martin L. Flanagan, President and Chief Executive Officer; Loren M. Starr, Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer; Colin D. Meadows, Senior Managing Director and Chief Administrative Officer and Kevin M. Carome, Senior Managing Director and General Counsel. Why did I not receive my proxy materials in the mail? As permitted by rules of the SEC, Invesco is making this Proxy Statement and its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (“Annual Report”) available to its shareholders electronically via the Internet. The “e-proxy” process expedites shareholders’ receipt of proxy materials and lowers the costs and reduces the environmental impact of our Annual General Meeting. On March 31, 2014, we mailed to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 17, 2014 (“Record Date”) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (“Notice”) containing instructions on how to access this Proxy Statement, our Annual Report and other soliciting materials via the Internet. If you received a Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. Instead, the Notice instructs you on how to access and review all of the important information contained in the Proxy Statement and Annual Report. The Notice also instructs you on how you may submit your proxy. If you received a Notice by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions included in the Notice for requesting such materials. If you are delivering proxy materials via the Internet, why did I receive my proxy materials in the mail? Certain regulations that apply to the Invesco 401(k) Plan and the Invesco Money Purchase Plan require us to send copies of the proxy materials to persons who have interests in Invesco common shares through participation in those plans. These individuals are not eligible to vote directly at the Annual General Meeting. They may, however, instruct the trustees or plan administrators of these plans how to vote the common shares represented by their interests. Who is entitled to vote? Each holder of record of Invesco common shares on the Record Date for the Annual General Meeting is entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting. Description of the ESPP The following summary describes the most significant features of the ESPP. This summary is not intended to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the ESPP, a copy of which is attached as Appendix A to this Proxy Statement and which is incorporated herein by reference thereto. What is the difference between holding shares as a “shareholder of record” and as a “beneficial owner”? • Shareholders of Record.    You are a shareholder of record if at the close of business on the Record Date your shares were registered directly in your name with Computershare, our transfer agent. • Beneficial Owner.    You are a beneficial owner if at the close of business on the Record Date your shares were held by a brokerage firm or other nominee and not in your name. Being a beneficial owner means that, like most of our shareholders, your shares are held in “street name.” As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions your broker or other nominee provides. If you do not provide your broker or nominee with instructions on how to vote your shares, your broker or nominee will be able to vote your shares with respect to some of the proposals, but not all. Please see “What if I return a signed proxy or voting instruction card,but do not specify how my shares are to be voted?” below for additional information. • Invesco has requested banks, brokerage firms and other nominees who hold Invesco common shares on behalf of beneficial owners of the common shares as of the close of business on the Record Date to forward the Notice to those beneficial owners. Invesco has agreed to pay the reasonable expenses of the banks, brokerage firms and other nominees for forwarding these materials. How many votes do I have? Every holder of a common share on the Record Date will be entitled to one vote per share for each Director to be elected at the Annual General Meeting and to one vote per share on each other matter presented at the Annual General Meeting. On the Record Date there were 432,756,834 common shares outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual General Meeting. What proposals are being presented at the Annual General Meeting? Invesco intends to present proposals numbered one through four for shareholder consideration and voting at the Annual General Meeting. These proposals are for: 1. Amendment to the Bye-Laws to declassify our Board of Directors; 2. Election of two (2) members of the Board of Directors; 3. Advisory vote to approve executive compensation; and 4. Appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Other than the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement and matters incident to the conduct of the Annual General Meeting, Invesco does not know of any business or proposals to be considered at the Annual General Meeting. If any other business is proposed and properly presented at the Annual General Meeting, the proxies received from our shareholders give the proxy holders the authority to vote on such matter in their discretion. Administration.    The ESPP will be administered by a committee that will be the Compensation Committee of the company’s Board of Directors or a subcommittee of the Board that is appointed by the Board to be the committee for the ESPP. The committee is authorized to determine the subsidiaries and affiliates of the company that will participate in the ESPP, the eligibility of employees to participate in the ESPP, the number of shares that participants may purchase under the ESPP and the terms and conditions under which such shares may be purchased. In addition, the committee is authorized to take all other actions that are necessary or appropriate to administer the ESPP. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the committee may delegate its administrative authority to any person or group of persons that it selects, and that person or group will be deemed to be the committee to the extent of its authority. How does the Board of Directors recommend that I vote? The Board of Directors recommends that you vote: • FOR the amendment to the Bye-Laws to declassify our Board of Directors; • FOR the election of the two (2) directors nominated by our Board and named in this proxy statement; • FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers; and • FOR appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm. How do I attend the Annual General Meeting? All shareholders are invited to attend the Annual General Meeting. An admission ticket (or other proof of share ownership) and some form of government-issued photo identification (such as a valid driver’s license or passport) will be required for admission to the Annual General Meeting. Only shareholders who own Invesco common shares as of the close of business on the Record Date and invited guests will be entitled to attend the meeting. An admission ticket will serve as verification of your ownership. Registration will begin at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time and the Annual General Meeting will begin at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. • If your Invesco shares are registered in your name and you received or accessed your proxy materials electronically via the Internet, click the appropriate box on the electronic proxy card or follow the telephone instructions when prompted and an admission ticket will be held for you at the check-in area at the Annual General Meeting. • If you received your proxy materials by mail and voted by completing your proxy card and checked the box indicating that you plan to attend the meeting, an admission ticket will be held for you at the check-in area at the Annual General Meeting. • If your Invesco shares are held in a bank or brokerage account, contact your bank or broker to obtain a written legal proxy in order to vote your shares at the meeting. If you do not obtain a legal proxy from your bank or broker, you will not be entitled to vote your shares, but you can still attend the Annual General Meeting if you bring a recent bank or brokerage statement showing that you owned Invesco common shares on March 17, 2014. You should report to the check-in area for admission to the Annual General Meeting. How do I vote and what are the voting deadlines? You may vote your shares in person at the Annual General Meeting or by proxy. There are three ways to vote by proxy: • Via the Internet:You can submit a proxy via the Internet until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 14, 2014, by accessing the web site athttp://www.envisionreports.com/IVZand following the instructions you will find on the web site. Internet proxy submission is available 24 hours a day. You will be given the opportunity to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. Eligibility and Participation.    All individuals who are employees of the company (or any subsidiary or affiliate of the company that participates in the ESPP) on the last day of the period designated by the committee for enrollment in the ESPP and who meet the other eligibility criteria established by the committee will be eligible to participate in the ESPP. Approximately 5,100 employees are currently estimated to be eligible to participate in the ESPP. • By Telephone: You can submit a proxy by telephone until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 14, 2014, by calling toll-free1-800-652-VOTE (8683) (from the U.S. and Canada) and following the instructions. • By Mail:If you have received your proxy materials by mail, you can vote by marking, dating and signing your proxy card and returning it by mail in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you hold your common shares in an account with a bank or broker (i.e., in “street name”), you can vote by following the instructions on the voting instruction card provided to you by your bank or broker. Proxy cards returned by mail must be received no later than the close of business on May 14, 2014. Even if you plan to be present at the Annual General Meeting, we encourage you to vote your common shares by proxy using one of the methods described above. Invesco shareholders of record who attend the meeting may vote their common shares in person, even though they have sent in proxies. What if my common shares are held in an Invesco retirement plan? For participants in the Invesco 401(k) Plan and the Invesco Money Purchase Plan (collectively, the “Retirement Plans”), your shares will be voted as you instruct the trustees or plan administrators of the Retirement Plans. There are three ways to vote: via the Internet, by telephone or by returning your voting instruction card. Please follow the instructions included on your voting instruction card on how to vote using one of the three methods. Your vote will serve as voting instructions to the trustees or plan administrators of the Retirement Plans for shares allocated to your account, as well as a proportionate share of any unallocated shares and unvoted shares. If you do not vote shares allocated to your account held in the Retirement Plans, the trustee or plan administrator will vote your shares in the same proportion as the shares for which instructions were received from all other holders of common shares in the Retirement Plan. You cannot vote your Retirement Plan shares in person at the meeting.To allow sufficient time for voting by the trustees and plan administrators of the Retirement Plans, the trustees and plan administrators must receive your vote by no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 12, 2014. What if I hold restricted shares? For participants in the Invesco Global Stock Plan, the 2008 Global Equity Incentive Plan, 2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST) and 2011 Global Equity Incentive Plan who hold restricted share awards through the company’s stock plan administrator, your restricted shares will be voted as you instruct the custodian for such shares, Invesco Ltd. (the “Custodian”). There are three ways to vote: via the Internet, by telephone or by returning your voting instruction card. Please follow the instructions included on your voting instruction card on how to vote using one of the three methods. Your vote will serve as voting instructions to the Custodian for your restricted shares. If you do not provide instructions regarding your restricted shares, the Custodian will not vote them. You cannot vote your restricted shares in person at the meeting.To allow sufficient time for voting by the Custodian, the Custodian must receive your vote by no later than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 12, 2014. Offerings.    The ESPP will be implemented through annual offerings to purchase shares. Each offering will begin and end on dates that are specified by the committee before the commencement of the offering period. It is anticipated that each offering will generally last for twelve months and that an offering will be made each year until the ESPP terminates, although the committee may decline to make a future offering at any time. May I change or revoke my vote? Yes. You may change your vote in one of several ways at any time before it is cast: • Grant a subsequent proxy via the Internet or telephone; • Submit another proxy card (or voting instruction card) with a date later than your previously delivered proxy; • Notify our Secretary in writing before the Annual General Meeting that you are revoking your proxy or, if you hold your shares in “street name,” follow the instructions on the voting instruction card; or • If you are a shareholder of record, or a beneficial owner with a proxy from the shareholder of record, vote in person at the Annual General Meeting. What will happen if I do not vote my shares? • Shareholders of Record. If you are the shareholder of record of your shares and you do not vote in person at the Annual General Meeting, or by proxy via the Internet, by telephone, or by mail, your shares will not be voted at the Annual General Meeting. • Beneficial Owners. If you are the beneficial owner of your shares, your broker or nominee may vote your shares only on those proposals on which it has discretion to vote. Under NYSE rules, your broker or nominee has discretion to vote your shares on routine matters, such as Proposal No. 4, but doesnot have discretion to vote your shares on non-routine matters, such as Proposals No. 1, 2 and 3. Therefore, if you do not instruct your broker as to how to vote your shares on Proposals No. 1, 2 or 3, this would be a “broker non-vote,” and your shares would not be counted as having been voted on the applicable proposal.We therefore strongly encourage you to instruct your broker or nominee on how you wish to vote your shares. What is the effect of a broker non-vote or abstention? Under NYSE rules, brokers or other nominees who hold shares for a beneficial owner have the discretion to vote on a limited number of routine proposals when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner at least ten days prior to the Annual General Meeting. A “broker non-vote” occurs when a broker or other nominee does not receive such voting instructions and does not have the discretion to vote the shares. Pursuant to Bermuda law, broker non-votes and abstentions are not included in the determination of the common shares voting on such matter, but are counted for quorum purposes. What if I return a signed proxy or voting instruction card, but do not specify how my shares are to be voted? • Shareholders of Record. If you are a shareholder of record and you submit a proxy, but you do not provide voting instructions, all of your shares will be voted FOR Proposals No. 1, 2, 3 and 4. • Beneficial Owners. If you are a beneficial owner and you do not provide the broker or other nominee that holds your shares with voting instructions, the broker or other nominee will determine if it has the discretionary authority to vote on the particular matter. Under NYSE rules, brokers and other nominees have the discretion to vote on routine matters, such as Proposal No. 4, but do not have discretion to vote on non-routine matters, such as Each participant will make an election before the offering commencement date to have the participant’s employer deduct a specified amount from the participant’s base salary or regular earnings on an after-tax basis during each payroll period during the offering, and these deductions will be credited to an account established for each participant. If payroll deductions are prohibited under applicable local law, the committee may authorize participants to make regular contributions in a specified amount to their accounts. The maximum amount that may be credited to a participant’s account during any single offering period may not exceed US $6,000 (or an equivalent amount in the local currency in which the participant is normally paid) or a lesser amount established by the committee. A participant’s election generally cannot be changed during an offering unless the participant withdraws completely from the ESPP, as explained below. On each offering commencement date, the company will grant to each participant an option to purchase the number of shares that can be purchased with the amounts credited to the participant’s account on the offering termination date at the applicable purchase price. The applicable purchase price per share will be 85% of the fair market value of a common share of the company on the offering termination date. Under no circumstances, however, may a participant purchase more than 1,000 shares during any one offering. On the offering termination date, the option held by a participant will be exercised automatically to purchase the number of full shares that can be purchased at the applicable purchase price on that date. After the satisfaction of tax withholding requirements, the shares acquired upon the exercise of an option will be delivered as soon as practicable. Any amounts remaining in the participant’s account after exercise will be returned to the participant. Voluntary Withdrawal.    A participant may withdraw from the ESPP by giving a notice of withdrawal. Upon receipt of a notice of withdrawal, the participant’s option will be canceled immediately, and all amounts credited to the participant’s account will be returned to the participant. A participant who withdraws from the ESPP during an offering will be prohibited from participating again in that offering and from making any further contributions to the participant’s account during the offering. The participant may participate in future offerings by complying with the procedures otherwise applicable to eligible employees who wish to participate in the ESPP for the first time. Termination of Employment and Leaves of Absence.    If a participant terminates employment with the company and all subsidiaries and affiliates due to death, disability or a reduction in force or after attaining age 55 and performing 10 years of service, the participant (or the participant’s beneficiary, if applicable) may choose either to (i) withdraw from the ESPP, as described above or (ii) permit the exercise of the participant’s option on the offering termination date. If a participant terminates employment for any other reason, the participant’s option will be canceled, and the amounts in the participant’s account will be returned to the participant. If a participant takes an approved leave of absence, the participant may choose to (i) withdraw voluntarily from the ESPP, as described above, (ii) continue payroll deductions (or contributions, if applicable) with respect to the offering and exercise the participant’s option on the offering termination date or (iii) discontinue payroll deductions (or contributions) but exercise the participant’s option on the offering termination date with the amounts then credited to the participant’s account. Change in Control.    If the company experiences a change in control or one of its subsidiaries, affiliates or business segments ceases to be a subsidiary, affiliate or business segment, the option of each employee (in the case of a change in control) or each employee who is employed by the subsidiary, affiliate or business segment that ceases to be a subsidiary, affiliate or business segment (in all other instances), will be exercised immediately unless the committee determines that the exercise would result in unfavorable tax treatment. Amendment and Termination.    The company’s Board of Directors or the committee may amend, terminate or cancel the ESPP or any option at any time, provided, however, that any amendment implementing a change for which shareholder approval is required will not be effective unless shareholder approval is obtained. Upon the termination or cancellation of the ESPP or any option, the Board of Directors or the committee will have the discretion to determine whether to return amounts held in participants’ accounts or to accelerate the offering termination date and permit the exercise of the outstanding options to the extent that the acceleration would not result in unfavorable tax treatment. International Offerings.    It is expected that the committee will permit employees who are located outside of the U.S. to participate in the ESPP. The terms and conditions applicable to non-U.S. participants may differ from those described above, as determined by the committee. Term of the ESPP.    If approved by shareholders, the ESPP will become effective as of the date that the shareholders give their approval, and no options will be granted under the ESPP after the ten-year anniversary of that date. U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences The following discussion is intended only as a general summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of options issued under the ESPP for the purposes of shareholders considering how to vote on this proposal. It is not intended as tax guidance to participants in the ESPP. This summary does not take into account certain circumstances that may change the income tax treatment of options for individual participants, and it does not describe the state income tax consequences of any option or the taxation of options in jurisdictions outside of the U.S. Income to Participants.    The grant of an option under the ESPP generally has no tax consequences for a participant or the company. Upon the exercise of an option, a participant will generally recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the shares acquired on the date of exercise, less the amount paid for the shares. The ESPP is not intended to be an employee stock purchase plan within the meaning of section 423 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (“Code”), and it is not intended to provide participants with favorable tax treatment under the tax laws of any other country. Deductions by the Company.    The company will generally be entitled to a deduction equal to the amount included in the ordinary income of participants. Section 162(m) of the Code, however, limits the company’s deduction for compensation paid to a covered employee to $1 million per year. Therefore, to the extent that the compensation of a covered employee exceeds $1 million, the company may not be able to deduct the amount includible in the covered employee’s income due to the exercise of an option under the ESPP. Anticipated Grants We currently expect that if the ESPP is approved by our shareholders, the first offering will commence, and options will be granted under the ESPP, as soon as administratively practicable after this approval. Because the number of shares that participants in the ESPP will be permitted to purchase pursuant to options granted during this offering will depend on the amounts that the participants elect to contribute under the ESPP (not to exceed US $6,000 per participant) and the fair market value of our shares on the last day of the offering, we cannot now anticipate the aggregate number of shares that may be purchased during this offering, nor can we anticipate the number of shares, if any, that our named executive officers or other senior officers may purchase during this offering. Similarly, the number of shares that would have been issued under the ESPP with respect to our last completed fiscal year, assuming that the ESPP had been in effect during such time, is not determinable. The closing price of our shares on the New York Stock Exchange on March 19 was $26.30 per share. Required Vote This proposal must receive an affirmative majority of the votes cast at this meeting to approve the 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The voting requirements for this proposal also are described in the “Questions and Answers About Voting Your Common Shares” section of this Proxy Statement. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR PROPOSAL NO. 3, APPROVING THE 2012 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN. PROPOSAL NO. Proposals No. 1, 2 and 3. Therefore, if you do not provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your broker or other nominee may only vote your shares on Proposal No. 4 and any other routine matters properly presented for a vote at the Annual General Meeting. What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials? It means you own Invesco common shares in more than one account, such as individually and jointly with your spouse.Please vote all of your common shares. Please see “Householding of Proxy Materials” below for information on how you may elect to receive only one Notice. What is a quorum? A quorum is necessary to hold a valid meeting. The presence, in person, of two or more persons representing, in person or by proxy, more than fifty percent (50%) of the issued and outstanding common shares entitled to vote at the meeting as of the Record Date constitutes a quorum for the conduct of business. What vote is required in order to approve each proposal? The affirmative vote of at least 75% of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company is required to approve Proposal No. 1. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on Proposals No. 2, 3 and 4 at the Annual General Meeting is required to approve such Proposals. Under our Bye-Laws, a majority of the votes cast means the number of shares voted “for” a proposal must exceed 50% of the votes cast with respect to such proposal. Votes “cast” include only votes cast with respect to shares present in person or represented by proxy and excludes broker non-votes and abstentions. How will voting on any other business be conducted? Other than the matters set forth in this Proxy Statement and matters incident to the conduct of the Annual General Meeting, we do not know of any business or proposals to be considered at the Annual General Meeting. If any other business is proposed and properly presented at the Annual General Meeting, the persons named as proxies will vote on the matter in their discretion. What happens if the Annual General Meeting is adjourned or postponed? Your proxy will still be effective and will be voted at the rescheduled Annual General Meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted. Who will count the votes? A representative of Computershare, our transfer agent, will act as the inspector of election and will tabulate the votes. How can I find the results of the Annual General Meeting? Preliminary results will be announced at the Annual General Meeting. Final results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four (4) business days after the Annual General Meeting. Important Additional Information APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM GENERAL The Audit Committee of the Board has proposed the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 and to audit the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. During and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, Ernst & Young LLP audited and rendered opinions on the financial statements of the company and certain of its subsidiaries. Ernst & Young LLP also rendered an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. In addition, Ernst & Young LLP provides the company with tax consulting and compliance services, accounting and financial reporting advice on transactions and regulatory filings and certain other services not prohibited by applicable auditor independence requirements. See “Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” above. Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual General Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. It is also expected that they will be available to respond to appropriate questions. RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2012. The voting requirements for this proposal are described in the “Questions and Answers About Voting Your Common Shares” section of this Proxy Statement. If the appointment is not approved, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Costs of Solicitation The cost of solicitation of proxies will be paid by Invesco. We have retained MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to solicit proxies for a fee of approximately $20,000 plus a reasonable amount to cover expenses. Proxies may also be solicited in person, by telephone or electronically by Invesco personnel who will not receive additional compensation for such solicitation. Copies of proxy materials and our Annual Report on Form 10-K will be supplied to brokers and other nominees for the purpose of soliciting proxies from beneficial owners, and we will reimburse such brokers or other nominees for their reasonable expenses. Presentation of Financial Statements In accordance with Section 84 of the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda, Invesco’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20112013 will be presented at the Annual General Meeting. These statements have been approved by the Board. There is no requirement under Bermuda law that these statements be approved by shareholders, and no such approval will be sought at the Annual General Meeting. Registered and Principal Executive Offices The registered office of Invesco is located at Canon’s Court, 22 Victoria Street, Hamilton HM12, Bermuda. The principal executive offices of Invesco are located at Two Peachtree Pointe, 1555 Peachtree Street N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309, and the telephone number there is +1-404-892-0896.1-404-892-0896. Shareholder Proposals for the 20132015 Annual General Meeting In accordance with the rules established by the SEC, any shareholder proposal submitted pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act intended for inclusion in the proxy statement for next year’s annual general meeting of shareholders must be received by Invesco no later than 120 days before the anniversary of the date of this proxy statement (e.g., not later than November 30, 2012)December 1, 2014). Such proposals should be sent to our Secretary in writing to Invesco Ltd., Attn: Office of the Secretary, 1555 Peachtree Street N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309.30309, or by facsimile to 404-962-8214. To be included in the Proxy Statement, the proposal must comply with the requirements as to form and substance established by the SEC and our Bye-Laws, and must be a proper subject for shareholder action under Bermuda law. A shareholder may otherwise propose business for consideration or nominate persons for election to the Board in compliance with SEC proxy rules, Bermuda law, our Bye-Laws and other legal requirements, without seeking to have the proposal included in Invesco’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act. Under our Bye-Laws, notice of such a proposal must generally be provided to our Secretary not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual general meeting. The period under our Bye-Laws for receipt of such proposals for next year’s meeting is thus from January 17, 201315, 2015 to February 16, 2013.14, 2015. (However, if the date of the annual general meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, any notice by a shareholder of business or the nomination of directors for election or reelection to be brought before the annual general meeting to be timely must be so delivered (i) not earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to such annual general meeting and (ii) not later than the close of business on thelater of (A) the 90th day prior to such annual general meeting and (B) the 10th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made.) In addition, §§79-80 of the Bermuda Companies Act allows shareholders holding at least 5% of the total voting rights or totaling 100 record holders (provided that they advance to the Company all expenses involved and comply with certain deadlines) to require Invesco (i) to give notice of any resolution that such shareholders can properly propose at the next annual general meeting and/or (ii) to circulate a statement regarding any proposed resolution or business to be conducted at a general meeting. Under Rule 14a-4 under the Exchange Act, proxies may be voted on matters properly brought before a meeting under these procedures in the discretion of the proxy holders, without additional proxy statement disclosure about the matter, unless Invesco is notified about the matter not less than 90 nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual general meeting and the proponents otherwise satisfy the requirements of Rule 14a-4. The period under our Bye-Laws for receipt of such proposals for next year’s meeting is from January 17, 201315, 2015 to February 16, 2013.14, 2015. United States Securities and Exchange Commission Reports A copy of the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, including financial statements, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Annual Report”),2013, is being furnished concurrently herewith to all shareholders holding common shares as of the Record Date. Please read it carefully. Shareholders may obtain a copy of the Annual Report, without charge, by visiting the company’s Web site atwww.invesco.comor by submitting a request to our Secretary at:company.secretary@invesco.comor by writing Invesco Ltd., Attn: Office of the Secretary, Two Peachtree Pointe, 1555 Peachtree Street N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Upon request to our Secretary, the exhibits set forth on the exhibit index of the Annual Report may be made available at a reasonable charge (which will be limited to our reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibits). Communications with the Chairman and Non-ManagementNon-Executive Directors Any interested party may communicate with the Chairman of our Board or to our non-executive directors as a group at the following addresses: E-mail:company.secretary@invesco.com Fax: 404-962-8214 Mail: Invesco Ltd. Two Peachtree Pointe 1555 Peachtree Street Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Attn: Office of the Secretary Communications will be distributed to the Board, or to any of the Board’s committees or individual directors as appropriate, depending on the facts and circumstances of the communication. In that regard, the Invesco Board does not receive certain items which are unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board. In addition, the company maintains the Invesco Compliance Reporting Line for its employees or individuals outside the company to report complaints or concerns on an anonymous and confidential basis regarding questionable accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and possible violations of the company’s Code of Conduct or law. Further information about the Invesco Compliance Reporting Line is available on the company’s Web site. Non-employees may submit any complaint regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters directly to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors by sending a written communication appropriately addressed to:to the address given below, by facsimile to 404-962-8214, or by e-mail tocompany.secretary@invesco.com: Audit Committee Invesco Ltd. Two Peachtree Pointe 1555 Peachtree Street N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 Attn: Office of the General Counsel Householding of Proxy Materials The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries (such as banks and brokers) to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement and annual report addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for shareholders and cost savings for companies. A number of banks and brokers with account holders who are beneficial holders of the company’s common shares will be householding the company’s proxy materials or the Notice. Accordingly, a single copy of the proxy materials or Notice will be delivered to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once you have received notice from your bank or broker that it will be householding communications to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive separate proxy materials or copies of the Notice, please notify your bank or broker, or contact our Secretary at:company.secretary@invesco.com, or by mail to Invesco Ltd., Attn: Office of the Secretary, Two Peachtree Pointe, 1555 Peachtree Street N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309, or by facsimile to 404-962-8214, or by telephone to 404-892-0896. The company undertakes, upon oral or written request to the address or telephone number above, to deliver promptly a separate copy of the company’s proxy materials or the Notice to a shareholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the applicable document was delivered. Shareholders who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy materials or the Notice at their address and would like to request householding of their communications should contact their bank or broker or the company’s Investor Relations Department at the contact address and telephone number provided above. Appendix A Proposed Amendments to the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws The text below is a clean and marked version of the proposed changes to Bye-Laws 8, 11 and 12. In the marked version, deletions are indicated by strikeouts and additions are indicated by underlining. Clean Version of Proposed Amendments to Bye-Laws 8.Board Size; Term of Directors (1) Subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of preference shares, the Board shall consist of such number of Directors (not less than 3) as the Board may determine from time to time by resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the Board then in office. Any increase in the number of Directors on the Board pursuant to thisBye-Law 8 shall be deemed to be a vacancy and may be filled in accordance withBye-Law 12 hereof. A decrease in the number of Directors shall not shorten the term of any Director then in office. (3) Commencing at the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2015 and each succeeding annual general meeting of Shareholders, Directors shall be elected annually for a one-year term expiring at the next annual general meeting of Shareholders; provided however, each Director elected at the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2013 shall hold office until the annual general meeting of shareholders in 2016, and each Director elected at the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2014 shall hold office until the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2017. A Director shall hold office until such Director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified or until such Director is removed from office pursuant toBye-Law 11 or such Director’s office is otherwise earlier vacated. 11.Removal of Directors (2) Subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of preference shares, a vacancy on the Board created by the removal of a Director under the provisions of paragraph (1) of thisBye-Law 11 may be filled by the Shareholders at the meeting at which such Director is removed, acting by the affirmative vote of Shareholders holding at least a majority of the total combined voting power of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company entitled to vote on the election of Directors, and, in the absence of such election or appointment, the Board may fill the vacancy. A Director so elected or appointed shall hold office until the next annual general meeting of Shareholders. 12.Vacancies on the Board (1) Subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of preference shares, the Board shall have the power from time to time and at any time to appoint any person as a Director to fill a vacancy on the Board occurring as the result of any of the events listed in paragraph (3) of thisBye-Law 12 or from an increase in the size of the Board pursuant toBye-Law 8. The Board shall also have the power from time to time to fill any vacancy left unfilled at a general meeting. A Director appointed by the Board to fill a vacancy shall hold office until the next annual general meeting of shareholders. Marked Version of Proposed Amendments to Bye-Laws 8.Board Size;TermClassesof Directors (1) Subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of preference shares, the Board shall consist of such number of Directors (not less than 3) as the Board may determine from time to time by resolution adopted by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the Board then in office. Any increase in the number of Directors on the Board pursuant to thisBye-Law 8 shall be deemed to be a vacancy and may be filled in accordance withBye-Law 12 hereof.A decrease in the number of Directors shall not shorten the term of any Director then in office. (3) At the time when these Bye-Laws come into effect (as indicated in the resolution of the Shareholders adopting these Bye-Laws), subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of preference shares, the Directors shall be divided into three classes, designated “Class I,” “Class II” and “Class III.” Each class shall consist, as nearly as may be possible, of one-third of the total number of Directors constituting the entire Board. The Class I Directors shall initially serve a one year term of office (expiring at the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2008), the Class II Directors shall initially serve a two year term of office (expiring at the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2009) and the Class III Directors shall initially serve a three year term of office (expiring at the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2010). Commencing Aat the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 201508 and each succeeding annual general meeting of Shareholders,successors to the class of Directorswhose term expires at such annual general meeting of Shareholdersshall be electedannuallyfor aonethree-year term expiring at the next annual general meeting of Shareholders; provided however, each Director elected at the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2013 shall hold office until the annual general meeting of shareholders in 2016, and each Director elected at the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2014 shall hold office until the annual general meeting of Shareholders in 2017.If the number of Directors is changed, the Board shall apportion any increase or decrease among the classes so as to maintain the number of Directors in each class as nearly equal as possible, and any Director of any class elected to fill a vacancy shall hold office for a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of the other Directors of that class, but in no case shall a decrease in the number of Directors shorten the term of any Director then in office.A Director shall hold office until the annual general meeting of Shareholders for the year in which such Director’s term expires; provided that, notwithstanding the foregoing, each Director shall hold office until such Director’s successor shall have been duly elected and qualified or until such Director is removed from office pursuant toBye-Law 11 or such Director’s office is otherwise earlier vacated. 11.Removal of Directors (2) Subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of preference shares, a vacancy on the Board created by the removal of a Director under the provisions of paragraph (1) of thisBye-Law 11 may be filled by the Shareholders at the meeting at which such Director is removed, acting by the affirmative vote of Shareholders holding at least a majority of the total combined voting power of all of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company entitled to vote on the election of Directors, and, in the absence of such election or appointment, the Board may fill the vacancy. A Director so elected or appointed shall hold officeuntil the next annual general meeting of Shareholdersfor a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of the removed Director. 12.Vacancies on the Board (1) Subject to the rights of the holders of any class or series of preference shares, the Board shall have the power from time to time and at any time to appoint any person as a Director to fill a vacancy on the Board occurring as the result of any of the events listed in paragraph (3) of thisBye-Law 12 or from an increase in the size of the Board pursuant toBye-Law 8. The Board shall also have the power from time to time to fill any vacancy left unfilled at a general meeting. A Director appointed by the Board to fill a vacancy shall hold officeuntil the next annual general meeting of shareholdersfor a term that shall coincide with the remaining term of the other Directors of the class in which such vacancy arose and as otherwise provided inBye-Law 8(3). INVESCO LTD. Invesco Ltd. TWO PEACHTREE POINTE, 1555 PEACHTREE STREET N.E., ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30309 Vote by Internet •  Go towww.envisionreports.com/IVZ •  Or scan the QR code with your smartphone •  Follow the steps outlined on the secure website Shareholder Meeting Notice XXXX XXXX XXXX XXX Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Invesco Ltd. Shareholder Meeting to be Held on May 15, 2014 Thursday, May 17, 2012Under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, you are receiving this notice that the proxy materials for the annual shareholders’ meeting are available on the Internet. Follow the instructions below to view the materials and vote online or request a copy. The items to be voted on and location of the annual meeting are on the reverse side. Your vote is important! This communication presents only an overview of the more complete proxy materials that are available to you on the Internet. We encourage you to access and review all of the important information contained in the proxy materials before voting. The proxy statement and annual report to shareholders are available at: www.envisionreports.com/IVZ     ToEasy Online Access — A Convenient Way to View Proxy Materials and Vote When you go online to view materials, you can also vote your shares. Step 1:Go towww.envisionreports.com/IVZto view the Proxy Statementmaterials. Step 2:Click onCast Your Vote or Request Materials. Step 3:Follow the instructions on the screen to log in. Step 4:Make your selection as instructed on each screen to select delivery preferences and Annual Report on Form 10-K on the Internet, have your 11-digit Control #(s) and visit: http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/ivzvote. When you go online, you can also help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery of future materials.   Obtaining a Copy of the Proxy Materials – If you want to receive a copy of these documents, you must request one. There is no charge to you for requesting a copy. Please make your request for a copy as instructed on the reverse side on or before May 5, 2014 to facilitate timely delivery. Shareholder Meeting Notice Dear Invesco Ltd. Shareholder: The 20122014 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of Invesco Ltd. (the “Company”) will be held at the Company’s headquarters in the Appalachians Room, 18th Floor, at Invesco’s Global Headquarters, located at Two Peachtree Pointe, 1555 Peachtree Street N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309, on Thursday, May 17, 2012,15, 2014, at 1:00 p.m. (local time). The following proposals will be voted upon at the Annual General Meeting:     (1) to elect four (4) directorsamend the Invesco Ltd. Amended and Restated Bye-Laws to serve until the 2015 Annual General Meeting;declassify our Board of Directors;     (2) to elect two (2) directors to serve until the 2017 Annual Meeting; (3) to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation; and     (3)(4) to approve the Invesco Ltd. 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; (4) to appoint Ernst & YoungPricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; andfirm. (5) to consider and act upon such other business that may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment(s) thereof. The Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR”“FOR” Items 1, 2, 3 and 4. The record date for the Annual General Meeting is March 19, 2012. Only shareholdersBoard of record atDirectors has fixed the close of business on thatMarch 17, 2014 as the record date may(the “Record Date”) for the determination of shareholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meetingAnnual General Meeting or any adjournmentadjournment(s) thereof. Shareholders of record as of the Record Date are cordially invited to attend the Annual General Meeting. Directions on how to attend the Annual General Meeting andwhere you may vote in person can be found on our company Web site at:website,www.invesco.com/invest.www.invesco.com PLEASE NOTE – YOU CANNOT VOTE BY RETURNING THIS NOTICE. To vote your shares you must vote online or request a paper copy of the proxy materials to receive a proxy card. If you wish to attend and vote at the meeting, please bring this notice with you.     You may vote your proxy when you view the materials on the Internet. You will be asked to enter your 11 digit control number. ACCESSING YOUR PROXY MATERIALS ONLINE The Proxy Materials for Invesco Ltd. are available to review at: http://bnymellon.mobular.net/bnymellon/ivz The following Proxy Materials are available for you to review online: the Company’s 2012 Proxy Statement; the Proxy Card; the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 (which is not deemed to be part of the official proxy soliciting materials); and any amendments to the foregoing materials that are required to be furnished to shareholders. Have this Notice available WHEN YOU WANT TO VIEW your Proxy Materials online or WHEN YOU WANT TO VOTE YOUR SHARES ELECTRONICALLY or WHEN YOU WANT TO REQUEST A PAPER COPY of the Proxy Materials. APPENDIX A INVESCO LTD. 2012 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 1. Purpose The purpose of the Plan is to provide Eligible Employees with (i) a convenient means to acquire common shares of the Company at a discount to market value, (ii) an incentive for continued employment and (iii) an incentive to increase Shareholder value. The Plan is intended to provide Options that either comply with or are exempt from the requirements of section 409A of the U.S. Code, and the terms of the Plan and the Options granted thereunder will be interpreted and administered in a manner that is consistent with that intention. The Plan is not intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” within the meaning of section 423 of the U.S. Code, and the Options granted under the Plan are not intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under the laws of any country. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company may establish one or more sub-plans of the Plan for Employees of designated Employers located in countries outside of the United States in order to achieve tax, employment, securities law or other purposes and objectives, and to conform the terms of the Plan with the laws and requirements of such countries in order to allow such Employers to purchase Shares in a manner similar to the Plan. 2. Effective Date and Term of Plan The Plan was adopted by the Board on February 16, 2012 and is effective as of [May 17, 2012], which is the date on which it was approved by the Shareholders of the Company (the “Effective Date”). No Options will be granted under the Plan after the tenth (10th) anniversary of the Effective Date. 3. Definitions Each capitalized word, term or phrase used in the Plan shall have the meaning set forth in this Section 3 or, if not defined in this Section, the first place that it appears in the Plan. “Account” means the account established for each Participant under the Plan, which will be maintained in the currency used by the Employer to pay the Participant’s base salary or regular earnings and will be converted to U.S. Dollars as provided in Section 6(a), if applicable. Amounts credited to a Participant’s Account may be held by an Employer in its general corporate accounts or in one or more trusts, as determined by the Committee in its discretion in accordance with applicable law, and will not be credited with interest or earnings of any kind, unless required by applicable law. “Affiliate” means a corporation or other entity controlled by, controlling or under common control with, the Company. “Applicable Exchange” means the New York Stock Exchange or such other securities exchange as may be the principal market for the Shares at the applicable time. “Beneficiary” means the person(s) or trust(s) designated by a Participant in the Participant’s most recent written (including electronic) beneficiary designation filed with the Committee or its agent to receive any amounts or Shares payable or deliverable to, or exercise any applicable rights of, the Participant under the Plan after the Participant’s death (or such other person as determined under applicable law who is entitled to receive any benefits under the Plan in the event of the Participant’s death). If there is no surviving designated beneficiary at the time of the Participant’s death, the Beneficiary shall be the person(s) or trust(s) entitled by will or the laws of decent and distribution to receive such amounts or exercise such rights, as determined by the Committee. “Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company. “Change in Control” means any of the following events: (A) the acquisition by any individual, entity or group (within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time (the “Exchange Act”)) (a “Person”) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) of twenty-five percent (25%) or more of either (A) the then outstanding shares of the Company (the “Outstanding Company Shares”) or (B) the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors (the “Outstanding Company Voting Securities”);provided,however, that for purposes of this subsection (A), the following acquisitions shall not constitute a Change in Control: (1) any acquisition directly from the Company; (2) any acquisition by the Company; (3) any acquisition by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any corporation controlled by the Company; or (4) any acquisition pursuant to a transaction which complies with clauses (1), (2) and (3) of subsection (C) below; or (B) individuals who, as of January 1, 2012, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board;provided,however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to January 1, 2012 whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s Shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds (2/3) of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board, but excluding, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board; or (C) consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company or the acquisition of assets of another entity (each, a “Corporate Transaction”), in each case, unless, following such Corporate Transaction, (1) all or substantially all of the individuals and entities who were the beneficial owners, respectively, of the Outstanding Company Shares and Outstanding Company Voting Securities immediately prior to such Corporate Transaction beneficially own, directly or indirectly, more than fifty percent (50%) of, respectively, the then outstanding shares and the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, as the case may be, of the corporation or other entity resulting from such Corporate Transaction (including, without limitation, a corporation which as a result of such transaction owns the Company or all or substantially all of the Company’s assets either directly or through one or more subsidiaries) in substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such Corporate Transaction of the Outstanding Company Shares and Outstanding Company Voting Securities, as the case may be, (2) no Person (excluding any employee benefit plan or related trust of the Company or such corporation resulting from such Corporate Transaction) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, twenty-five percent (25%) or more of, respectively, the then outstanding shares of the corporation resulting from such Corporate Transaction or the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities of such corporation except to the extent that such ownership existed prior to the Corporate Transaction and (3) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation (or other governing board of a non-corporate entity) resulting from such Corporate Transaction were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the execution of the initial agreement, or of the action of the Board, providing for such Corporate Transaction; or (D) approval by the Shareholders of the Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an event described above will be a Change in Control with respect to an Option that is subject to taxation as a “nonqualified deferred compensation plan” under section 409A of the U.S. Code only if such event is also a change in the ownership or effective control of the Company or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company within the meaning of section 409A of the U.S. Code. “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board or such other committee or subcommittee of the Board as may be appointed by the Board to act as the Committee under the Plan. If at any time there is no such Compensation Committee or other committee or subcommittee appointed by the Board, the Board shall be the Committee. “Company” means Invesco Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company. “Disability” means, with respect to a Participant, (i) a “disability” (or words of similar meaning) as defined in any written employment, consulting or similar agreement between the Participant and the Employer, or (ii) if there is no such agreement or it does not define “disability” (or words of similar meaning), (A) a permanent and total disability as determined under the Company’s long-term disability plan applicable to the Participant or (B) if there is no such plan applicable to the Participant, “Disability” as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. The Committee may require such medical or other evidence as it deems necessary to judge the nature and permanency of the Participant’s condition. For purposes of Participants employed by an Employer outside of the United States, “Disability” shall be determined in accordance with the foregoing provisions except as may be otherwise required under applicable local law. “Disaffiliation” means a Subsidiary’s, Affiliate’s or business segment’s ceasing to be a Subsidiary, Affiliate or business segment for any reason (including, without limitation, as a result of a public offering, or a spinoff or sale by the Company, of the stock of the Subsidiary or Affiliate or a sale of a business segment by the Company or its Subsidiaries or Affiliates);provided, however, that an event described above will be a Disaffiliation for purposes of Section 8(e) of the Plan with respect to an Option that is subject to taxation as a “nonqualified deferred compensation plan” under section 409A of the U.S. Code only if such event is also a change in the ownership or effective control of a relevant corporation or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of a relevant corporation within the meaning of section 409A of the U.S. Code. “Effective Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 2. “Eligible Employee” means an Employee who (i) is an Employee on the last date designated by the Committee for enrollment in an Offering and (ii) meets such other eligibility criteria as may be determined by the Committee. “Employee” means any individual who is classified as an employee by an Employer on such Employer’s payroll records. An individual who is classified by an Employer as an independent contractor, leased employee, consultant, advisor or member of the Board is not an Employee for purposes of the Plan, even if such individual is determined to be a common law employee of an Employer. For purposes of individuals performing services for an Employer outside of the United States, “Employee” shall be determined in accordance with the foregoing provisions except as may be otherwise required under applicable local law. “Employer” means the Company and any Subsidiary or Affiliate that has been designated for participation in the Plan by the Committee. “Offering” has the meaning set forth in Section 5(a). “Offering Commencement Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 5(a). “Offering Termination Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 5(a). “Option” has the meaning set forth in Section 5(c). “Participant” means an Eligible Employee who has commenced participation in the Plan pursuant to Section 4(a) and who has not ceased participation in the Plan pursuant to Section 4(b). “Plan” means this Invesco Ltd. 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as set forth herein and as hereafter amended from time to time, and shall include any Appendices and sub-plans established hereunder to comply with the laws of jurisdictions outside of the United States of America. “Purchase Price” means the price per Share at which Shares may be acquired under an Option, which shall be eighty-five percent (85%) of the fair market value of a Share on the Offering Termination Date. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the fair market value of a Share as of any date shall be the closing price of a Share on the Applicable Exchange on such date or, if Shares are not readily tradable on the Applicable Exchange on such date, then on the next preceding date on which Shares are readily tradable, all as reported by such source as the Committee may select. If the Shares are not listed on a national securities exchange, fair market value for purposes of determining the Purchase Price shall be determined by the Committee in its good faith discretion. “Share” or“Shares” mean common shares, par value $0.20 each, of the Company. “Shareholder” has the same meaning as the term “Member” in the Companies Act 1981 of Bermuda. “Subsidiary” means any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company or other entity during any period in which at least fifty percent (50%) of the voting or profits interest is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company or any successor to the Company. “U.S. Code” means the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any successor thereto, the Treasury Regulations thereunder and any relevant interpretive guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service or the Treasury Department. Reference to any specific section of the U.S. Code shall be deemed to include such regulations and guidance, as well as any successor section, regulations and guidance. “U.S. Dollar” and“US $” mean and refer to the lawful currency of the United States of America. 4. Eligibility and Participation (a)Commencement of Participation.    An Eligible Employee shall become a Participant in the Plan and shall participate in an Offering by enrolling in the Plan before the applicable Offering Commencement Date and making an election authorizing the payroll deductions or contributions set forth in Section 5(b) in accordance with the procedures established by the Committee. An Eligible Employee who becomes a Participant pursuant to this Section shall remain a Participant and shall participate in all future Offerings until the individual ceases to be a Participant pursuant to Section 4(b). (b)Termination of Participation.    An individual shall cease to be a Participant in the Plan upon the first occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the Participant ceases to be an Eligible Employee, except as provided in Section 5(f); (ii) the Participant withdraws from the Plan pursuant to Sections 5(e), 5(f) or 5(g); or (iii) the Plan is terminated. 5. Offerings (a)General.    The Plan will be implemented through annual offerings to purchase Shares (each an “Offering”) as set forth in this Section 5. Each Offering will begin on a date specified by the Committee (the “Offering Commencement Date”) and will terminate on a subsequent date specified by the Committee, or if the Applicable Exchange is not open on such date, the next following date on which the Applicable Exchange is open (the “Offering Termination Date”). Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, (i) each Offering will last for a period of twelve consecutive months, and (ii) an Offering will be made each year until the Plan terminates. (b)Contributions to Accounts.    Unless payroll deductions are prohibited by applicable law, each Participant shall make an election before the Offering Commencement Date of an Offering to have the Employer deduct a specified amount on an after-tax basis from the base salary or regular earnings payable to the Participant each payroll period during the Offering (after all other required withholdings), and such amounts shall be credited to the Participant’s Account. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the maximum amount that may be credited to a Participant’s Account during any Offering shall not exceed US $6,000, or an equivalent amount in the currency in which the Participant’s base salary or regular earnings are paid, as determined by the Committee. A Participant’s election shall remain in effect for all Offerings commencing after the Participant makes such election, unless the Participant changes the election pursuant to Section 5(d), withdraws from the Plan pursuant to Sections 5(e), 5(f) or 5(g) or ceases to be an Eligible Employee. If applicable law prohibits payroll deductions, the Committee, in its discretion, may permit a Participant to make contributions to the Participant’s Account in a form acceptable to the Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion, suspend or reduce a Participant’s payroll deductions or contributions under the Plan as it deems advisable. Except where otherwise required under applicable local law, all Participant contributions may be held in a general account established in the name of the Company or the Employer that employs the applicable Participant. (c)Grant of Option.    On the Offering Commencement Date, the Company shall grant to each Participant an option (“Option”) to purchase on the Offering Termination Date the number of Shares that may be purchased at the Purchase Price with the amounts credited to the Participant’s Account on such date, up to a maximum of 1,000 Shares or such other number of Shares as the Committee shall determine in its discretion before the Offering Commencement Date. (d)Changes to Contributions.    Before the Offering Commencement Date of an Offering, a Participant may elect to change the amount that will be deducted from the Participant’s base salary or regular earnings each payroll period during such Offering, subject to the limits set forth in Section 5(b). A Participant will be permitted to withdraw from the Plan during an Offering as provided in Section 5(e), but a Participant will not otherwise be permitted to increase or decrease such payroll deductions during an Offering, except as provided by the Committee in its discretion. (e)Withdrawal.    A Participant may withdraw from the Plan before an Offering Termination Date by giving notice of withdrawal in such form and at such time as the Committee shall determine. Upon receipt of a notice of withdrawal, the Participant’s Option shall be cancelled immediately, and all amounts credited to a Participant’s Account shall be returned to the Participant as soon as administratively practicable without interest, unless the payment of interest is required by applicable law. A Participant who withdraws from the Plan pursuant to this Section shall be prohibited from (i) participating again in the Offering during which the withdrawal occurred and (ii) making any further contributions to the Participant’s Account during such Offering. The Committee may, in its discretion, treat any attempt by the Participant to transfer, pledge or otherwise encumber the Participant’s Account or Option as a notice of withdrawal. After withdrawing from the Plan pursuant to this Section, an Eligible Employee may become a Participant in the Plan with respect to a future Offering pursuant to the procedures in Section 4(a). (f)Termination of Employment Due to Death, Disability, Reduction in Force or Retirement.    Upon the termination of a Participant’s employment due to death, Disability, reduction in force or attainment of age 55 and 10 years of service with an Employer, the Participant (or the Participant’s Beneficiary, in the event of death) may elect, by written notice given to the Committee before the earlier of the Offering Termination Date or the expiration of the 60-day period commencing on the date of the Participant’s termination of employment to (i) withdraw from the Plan in accordance with Section 5(e) or (ii) permit the exercise of the Participant’s Option pursuant to Section 6(a). In the event that no such written election is timely received by the Committee, the Participant shall be deemed to have elected to withdraw from the Plan in accordance with Section 5(e), and all amounts credited to the Participant’s Account will be returned to the Participant as soon as administratively practicable without interest, unless the payment of interest is required by applicable law. (g)Termination of Employment.    Upon termination of the Participant’s employment for any reason other than a reason set forth in Section 5(f), the Participant’s Option will be cancelled immediately, and all amounts credited to the Participant’s Account will be returned to the Participant as soon as administratively practicable without interest, unless the payment of interest is required by applicable law. (h)Leave of Absence.    If a Participant is on an approved leave of absence, such Participant may elect, by written notice received by the Committee before the earlier of the Offering Termination Date or the expiration of the 60-day period commencing on the date of the Participant’s leave of absence, to (i) withdraw from the Plan pursuant to Section 5(e), (ii) discontinue payroll deductions and other contributions to the Plan, as applicable, but permit the exercise of the Participant’s Option on the Offering Termination Date pursuant to Section 6(a), or (iii) continue payroll deductions or contributions to the Plan during the leave of absence pursuant to such procedures as may be established by the Committee and permit the exercise of the Participant’s Option on the Offering Termination Date pursuant to Section 6(a). A Participant on a leave of absence who terminates employment shall be subject to the provisions of Sections 5(f) or 5(g), as applicable. In the event that no such written election is timely received by the Committee, the Participant shall be deemed to have elected to continue payroll deductions or contributions during any period that the Participant remains on the payroll of the Employer and shall be deemed to have elected to withdraw from the Plan in accordance with Section 5(e) when the Participant ceases to be on the payroll of the Employer, at which time all amounts credited to the Participant’s Account will be returned to the Participant as soon as administratively practicable without interest, unless required by applicable law. For purposes of Participants employed by an Employer outside of the United States, whether a Participant is on an approved leave of absence shall be determined in accordance with applicable local law. (i)Transferability.    Neither any Options granted under the Plan nor any amounts credited to a Participant’s Account may be assigned, transferred, pledged or otherwise encumbered other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. Any such attempted assignment, transfer, pledge or other disposition of an Option or amounts credited to a Participant’s Account shall be without effect, except that the Committee may treat such act as an election to withdraw from the Plan in accordance with Section 5(e). (j)Participants’ Interests.    Participants will have no interest in, or any rights as a Shareholder with respect to, Shares subject to an Option until the Participant’s Option is exercised pursuant to Section 6(a). 6. Option Exercise (a)Automatic Exercise.    On each Offering Termination Date, the Account balance of each Participant that is denominated in a currency other than U.S. Dollars shall be converted to U.S. Dollars at a rate of exchange determined by the Committee in its sole discretion. Unless previously canceled, each Option then held by a Participant shall be exercised automatically to purchase the number of full Shares that can be purchased at the Purchase Price with the amounts then credited to the Participant’s Account to the extent that such amounts do not exceed US $6,000, or such lesser amount as determined by the Committee. Fractional Shares cannot be purchased under any Option. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the number of Shares that could be purchased under all Options outstanding on any Offering Termination Date exceeds the maximum number of Shares then available for issuance under the Plan, the outstanding Options shall be exercised pro rata in as nearly a uniform manner as practicable to purchase the number of Shares then available under the Plan, unless the Committee determines otherwise. Any amounts remaining in a Participant’s Account after the exercise of an Option will be returned to the Participant without interest, unless the payment of interest is required under applicable law. (b)Required Taxes.    No later than the date as of which an amount first becomes includible in the gross income of a Participant for federal, state, local or foreign income or employment or other tax purposes with respect to any Option, such Participant shall pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Company regarding the payment of, any federal, state, local or foreign taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to such amount. The obligations of an Employer under the Plan shall be conditional on such payment or arrangements, and an Employer shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payments otherwise due to the Participant. The Committee may establish such procedures as it deems appropriate for the settlement of withholding obligations. (c)Delivery of Stock.    As promptly as practicable after each Offering Termination Date, the Shares acquired upon the exercise of a Participant’s Option shall be delivered to the Participant or to a custodial or trust account maintained for the benefit of the Participant, as determined by the Committee. (d)Conditions for Issuance.    Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or agreements made pursuant thereto, the Company shall not be required to issue or deliver Shares under the Plan unless such issuance or delivery complies with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, including the requirements of any Applicable Exchange or similar entity, and the Company has obtained any consent, approval or permit from any federal, state or foreign governmental authority that the Committee determines to be necessary or advisable. 7. Shares (a)Maximum Shares.    The maximum number of Shares that can be issued under the Plan, subject to any adjustment upon changes in capitalization as provided in Section 7(b), shall be 3,000,000. Such Shares may be authorized but unissued Shares or Shares held by the Company as treasury shares. (b)Adjustment Upon Changes in Capitalization.    In the event of a merger, consolidation, stock rights offering, liquidation, spinoff, separation, Disaffiliation, reorganization or similar event affecting the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates, or a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, extraordinary dividend of cash or other property, share combination or recapitalization or similar event affecting the capital structure of the Company, the Committee or the Board shall make such equitable and appropriate substitutions or adjustments to (i) the aggregate number and kind of Shares reserved for issuance and delivery under the Plan, (ii) the number and kind of Shares subject to Options under the Plan and (iii) the Purchase Price with respect to Options under the Plan. 8. Administration (a)Authority of Committee.    The Plan will be administered by the Committee. The Committee shall have the authority to take the following actions, among others, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan: (i) to determine the Subsidiaries and Affiliates that participate in the Plan; (ii) to determine the eligibility of any individual to participate in the Plan; (iii) to determine whether and when an Offering will be made; (iv) to determine the number of Shares subject to an Offering and the number of Shares subject to an Option to be granted to any Participant; (v) to establish procedures for making payroll deductions or contributions under the Plan; (vi) to determine the maximum amount permitted to be credited to a Participant’s Account and to suspend or reduce a Participant’s payroll deductions or contributions for any reason that the Committee deems advisable; (vii) to determine the terms and conditions of each Offering made hereunder, based on such factors as the Committee shall determine; (viii) to adopt sub-plans and special provisions applicable to Offerings regulated by the laws of jurisdictions outside of the United States, which sub-plans and special provisions may take precedence over other provisions of the Plan; (ix) to modify, amend, adjust or cancel any Offering or Option or the terms and conditions of any Offering or Option; (x) to treat any Participant’s attempt to transfer, pledge or otherwise encumber the Participant’s Account or Option as a notice of withdrawal under the Plan; (xi) to adopt, alter and repeal such administrative rules, guidelines and practices governing the Plan as it shall deem advisable from time to time; (xii) to interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan; (xiii) to decide all other matters to be determined in connection with an Offering; and (xiv) to otherwise administer the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action taken by the Committee or its delegates that requires Shareholder approval under applicable law or Applicable Exchange rule shall be valid and effective only if the Shareholder approval is obtained as required. (b)Delegation of Authority.    To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may delegate any of its authority to administer the Plan to any person or persons selected by the Committee, including one or more members of the Committee, and such person or persons shall be deemed to be the Committee with respect to, and to the extent of, its or their authority. Any authority granted to the Committee may also be exercised by the full Board. To the extent that any permitted action taken by the Board conflicts with action taken by the Committee, the Board action shall control. (c)Procedures.    The Committee may act by a majority of its members then in office and, except to the extent prohibited by applicable law or the listing standards of the Applicable Exchange, through any person or persons to whom it has delegated its authority pursuant to Section 8(b). (d)Discretion of Committee and Binding Effect.    Any determination made by the Committee or an appropriately delegated person or persons with respect to the Plan shall be made in the sole discretion of the Committee or such delegate, unless in contravention of any express term of the Plan, including, without limitation, any determination involving the appropriateness or equitableness of any action. All decisions made by the Committee or any appropriately delegated person or persons shall be final and binding on all persons, including the Employers, Employees, Eligible Employees, Participants and Beneficiaries. (e)Change in Control and Disaffiliation.    In the event of a Change in Control or a Disaffiliation, the Option of each Participant (in the case of a Change in Control) or the Option of each Participant employed by the Subsidiary, Affiliate or business segment that ceases to be a Subsidiary, Affiliate or business segment pursuant to the Disaffiliation, as determined by the Committee in its discretion (in the case of a Disaffiliation), will be exercised immediately upon such Change in Control or Disaffiliation with respect to the Offering then in effect, unless the Committee determines that such exercise would result in the imposition of any tax or interest or the inclusion of any amounts in income pursuant to section 409A of the U.S. Code or unfavorable tax or accounting treatment under any other applicable law, rule or regulation. 9. Amendment and Termination The Board or the Committee, in its sole discretion, may amend, alter, cancel or terminate the Plan or any Option granted thereunder at any time, except that no amendment or alteration may increase the number of Shares that can be issued under the Plan, other than an adjustment under Section 7(b), or make other changes for which Shareholder approval is required under applicable law or Applicable Exchange rule unless such Shareholder approval is obtained as required. Upon a cancellation or termination of the Plan or any Option, the Board or the Committee will in its sole discretion (i) return to affected Participants all amounts credited to their Accounts without interest, unless the payment of interest is required under applicable law, or (ii) set an earlier Offering Termination Date to the extent permitted by section 409A of the U.S. Code. 10. Miscellaneous (a)Limitation of Liability.    No liability whatever shall attach to or be incurred by any past, present or future Shareholders, officers or directors of any Employer or any members of the Committee or their delegates under or by reason of any of the terms, conditions or agreements contained in this Plan or implied therefrom, and any and all liabilities of, and any and all rights and claims against, any Employer or any Shareholder, officer, director or Committee member whether arising at common law or in equity or created by statute or constitution or otherwise, pertaining to the Plan, are hereby expressly waived and released by every Participant as a part of the consideration for the benefits provided under the Plan. (b)International Offerings.    Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, establish sub-plans of the Plan for purposes of effectuating the participation of Employees employed by an Employer located in countries outside of the United States. For purposes of the foregoing, the Committee may establish one or more sub-plans to: (i) amend or vary the terms of the Plan in order to conform such terms with the laws, rules and regulations of each country outside of the United States where an Employer is located; (ii) amend or vary the terms of the Plan in each country where an Employer is located as it considers necessary or desirable to take into account or to mitigate or reduce the burden of taxation and social insurance contributions for Participants or the Employer; or (iii) amend or vary the terms of the Plan in each country outside of the United States where an Employer is located as it considers necessary or desirable to meet the goals and objectives of the Plan. Each sub-plan established pursuant to this Section 10(b) shall be reflected in a written appendix to the Plan for each Employer in such country, and shall be treated as being separate and independent from the Plan; provided, the total number of Shares authorized to be issued under the Plan shall include any Shares issued under any sub-plan of the Plan. To the extent permitted under applicable law, the Committee may delegate its authority and responsibilities under this Section 10(b) to an appropriate sub-committee consisting of one or more officers of the Company. (c)No Employment Rights.    Neither the Plan nor any Option granted hereunder shall, directly or indirectly, create any right with respect to continuation of employment by any Employer and shall not be deemed to interfere in any way with the right of any Employer to terminate or otherwise modify a Participant’s employment at any time. (d)Notices and Actions.    If any notice or action is required to be given, received or taken on or before a date or event specified in the Plan, the Committee may establish an earlier or later time by which such notice or action must be given, received or taken as it deems advisable for the efficient administration of the Plan. (e)U.S. Code Section 409A.    The Options granted under the Plan are intended either to comply with the requirements of section 409A of the U.S. Code to avoid the imposition of any tax or interest thereunder or to be exempt from the requirements of section 409A of the U.S. Code, and the Plan will be interpreted, administered and deemed amended, as necessary, in a manner consistent with this intention. Notwithstanding the foregoing, neither the Employers nor any members of the Committee shall be liable for any taxes, penalties or interest imposed with respect to any Options or amounts credited to any Account, including taxes, penalties or interest imposed under section 409A of the U.S. Code. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, if a Participant is entitled to the payment of interest on any amounts credited to the Participant’s Account with respect to an Offering and such interest is subject to federal income taxation under the U.S. Code, any amounts credited to the Participant’s Account that are required to be returned to the Participant under the terms of the Plan shall be returned within 60 days after the Offering Termination Date. (f)Governing Law.    The laws of the State of Georgia will govern all matters relating to this Plan, except to the extent it is superseded or preempted by the laws of the United States. YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY. We encourage you to take advantage of Internet or telephone voting. Both are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Internet and telephone are available for the return of proxies through 11:59 PM Eastern Time on May 16, 2012. Return of your proxy by internet or telephone authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card by mail.     Here’s how to order a copy of the proxy materials and select a future delivery preference:   ORPaper copies:Current and future paper delivery requests can be submitted via the telephone, Internet or email options below.   Email copies:Current and future email delivery requests must be submitted via the Internet following the instructions below. If you request an email copy of current materials you will receive an email with a link to the materials.   If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card. To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return itPLEASE NOTE:You must use the number in the enclosed postage-paid envelope WO#     Fulfillment#         19469     19485         q    FOLD AND DETACH HERE    q Please mark your votes as indicated in this example xshaded bar on the reverse side when requesting a set of proxy materials.   THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, OR IF NO DIRECTION IS INDICATED, WILL BE VOTED “FOR” EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR AND “FOR” ITEMS 2, 3 AND 4. ITEM 1– Election of Directorsg   Nominees: FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 1.1 Martin L. Flanagan ¨ ¨ ¨ ITEM 2Internet – ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE 2011    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ¨ ¨ ¨ 1.2 C. Robert Henrikson ¨ ¨ ¨ FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 1.3 Ben F. Johnson, II ¨ ¨ ¨ ITEM 3 – APPROVAL OF THE INVESCO LTD. 2012    EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN ¨ ¨ ¨ 1.4 J. Thomas Presby ¨ ¨ ¨ FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN ITEM 4– APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP    AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT    REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ¨ ¨ ¨ Go towww.envisionreports.com/IVZ. Click Cast Your Vote or Request Materials. Follow the instructions to log in and order a copy of the current meeting materials and submit your preference for email or paper delivery of future meeting materials.   g   I PLAN TO ATTEND THE MEETING    ¨ Mark HereTelephone– Call us free of charge at 1-866-641-4276 and follow the instructions to log in and order a paper copy of the materials by mail for Address Change or Comments SEE REVERSE ¨      NOTE: Please sign as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. Signature Signature Date the current meeting. You can now access your Invesco Ltd. account online. Access your Invesco Ltd. account online via Investor ServiceDirect® (ISD). The transfer agentalso submit a preference to receive a paper copy for Invesco Ltd., now makes it easy and convenient to get current information on your stockholder account. future meetings.   • View account status g   • View payment historyEmail– Send email to investorvote@computershare.com with “Proxy Materials Invesco Ltd.” in the subject line. Include in the message your full name and address, plus the number located in the shaded bar on the reverse, and state in the email that you want a paper copy of current meeting materials. You can also state your preference to receive a paper copy for dividends • View certificate history • Make address changes • View book-entry information • Obtain a duplicate 1099 tax formfuture meetings. Visit us onTo facilitate timely delivery, all requests for a paper copy of the web at www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equityaccessproxy materials must be received by May 5, 2014. For Technical Assistance Call 1-877-978-7778 between 9am-7pm Monday-Friday Eastern Time Investor ServiceDirect® Available 24 hours per day, 7 days per week TOLL FREE NUMBER: 1-800-370-1163   ChooseMLinkSMfor fast, easy and secure 24/7 online access to your future proxy materials, investment plan statements, tax documents and more. Simply log on toInvestor ServiceDirect® atwww.bnymellon.com/shareowner/equityaccess where step-by-step instructions will prompt you through enrollment.   Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders.The Proxy Statement and the 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at:http://www.proxyvoting.com/ivz FOLD AND DETACH HERE PROXY INVESCO LTD. Annual General Meeting of Shareholders – May 17, 2012 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF INVESCO LTD. The undersigned hereby appoints Rex D. Adams, Martin L. Flanagan, Loren M. Starr, Colin D. Meadows and Kevin M. Carome, and each of them, with power to act without the others and with power of substitution, as proxies and attorneys-in-fact, and hereby authorizes them to represent and vote, as provided on the other side, all the common shares of Invesco Ltd. which the undersigned is entitled to vote, and, in their discretion, to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders, or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, of Invesco Ltd., to be held in the Appalachians Room, 18th Floor, at Invesco’s Global Headquarters located at Two Peachtree Pointe, 1555 Peachtree Street N.E., Atlanta, GA 30309, with all powers which the undersigned would possess if present at the meeting.   Address Change/Comments            (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)                   SHAREOWNER SERVICES              P.O. BOX 3550              SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ 07606-9250               WO#    Fulfillment# (Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)    19469    19485